Connect with us

News

2020 Dem Makes It Perfectly Clear: If I Become President I Am Coming For Your Guns (Details)

Who needs a Second Amendment, right!?

John Salvatore

Published

on

2020 presidential hopeful Eric Swalwell represents California.

He must think all Americans share his same views on restricting the Second Amendment because the guy is pretty out there.

Check this out…

Trending: McAfee Dead in Prison After Repeatedly Declaring He Would Not Kill Himself

From Breitbart:

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration? (1)

  • Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

During a June 4, 2019, appearance on The View Democrat presidential hopeful Eric Swalwell reiterated his pledge to take AR-15s and similar rifles away from law-abiding citizens.

ABC News quoted Swalwell saying, “Ban and buy back every single assault weapon in America. I’m the only candidate calling for that.”

Not only is Eric radically far-left and anti-gun but he literally has no clue what he’s talking about on most occasions.

Here’s just the latest example…

From Daily Wire:

Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) is not known for showcasing his intelligence, and Wednesday was no exception. The high-profile Democrat and 2020 presidential contender took to Twitter to pander to women by complaining that the United States Constitution doesn’t have one use of the word “woman” in it.

His tweet:

Do you know how many times the word “Woman” is mentioned in the Constitution?

Zero.

That is unacceptable. Women must be equally represented and equally protected. #ERANow

Here’s the problem, Eric…

Yeah, except the Constitution also doesn’t include the word “man.” So instead of scoring points with women, all Swalwell managed to do was prove that he hasn’t read the Constitution and was too lazy to do a little fact-checking before firing off the tweet.

Eric got throttled:

Do you know how many times the word “Man” is mentioned in the Constitution?

Zero.

There’s dumb and then there’s “can’t read or use CTRL+F before tweeting” dumb.

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1123592201865326592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1123592201865326592&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2F46655%2Feric-swalwell-outraged-word-woman-not-constitution-amanda-prestigiacomo

This is the most @ericswalwell-y tweet I’ve seen in weeks.

Eric Swalwell is like a cartoony feminist side character in an old sitcom.

And here’s the winning tweet. This one TAKES THE CAKE…

WORDS IN CONSTITUTION

❌ woman

❌ man

❌ fair / fair share

❌ abortion

❌ health / healthcare

✅ arms

News

White House Announces Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal

This could be a big boon for a number of American industries as well.

Published

on

Regardless of what you think of Joe Biden touting this latest infrastructure deal as a “win”, it sure is nice to see that our government isn’t completely and utterly broken in the 21st century. It took months of bickering and infighting, and more than a few moments of political pettiness, but it appears as though we may just have an infrastructure deal after all. President Biden announced on Thursday that the White House and a group of bipartisan senators had reached a deal on a $579 billion infrastructure plan. “It’s been a very long time since the last time our country was able to strike a major bipartisan deal on American infrastructure,” Biden said at the White House. Biden said he and congressional Democrats had to concede some on what’s known as “human infrastructure,” such as investments for childcare and spending on climate change. Democrats will instead look to pass additional spending in a separate bill through a Senate budgetary process called reconciliation, which requires only a simple majority to pass legislation. And, despite no one having seen the bill yet, Biden is confident that Congress will send it to his desk to sign in the coming days. The radical left will likely be the most disappointed in the bill, after having previously suggested a goal of a $10 trillion investment in climate change initiatives.

Continue Reading

News

Miami Building Collapsed After Years of Sinking into the Earth

Scientists has determined the issue years ago.

Published

on

Just north of Miami, in the nearby town of Surfside, there is a massive rescue effort underway as nearly 100 people remain unaccounted for in the wake of a residential high-rise’s collapse. That number was nearly double the early estimate, having risen dramatically on Thursday afternoon as more information became available to those leading the effort. The late-night collapse, which was captured on video by a nearby surveillance camera, appeared to be a sudden, freak accident, but new information seems to indicate that there might be more to this story. A Florida high rise that collapsed early Thursday was determined to be unstable a year ago, according to a researcher at Florida International University. The building, which was constructed in 1981, has been sinking at an alarming rate since the 1990s, according to a 2020 study conducted by Shimon Wdowinski, a professor in the Department of Earth and Environment. When Wdowinski saw the news that the Champlain Towers South condominium in Surfside had collapsed, he instantly remembered it from the study, he said. “I looked at it this morning and said, ‘Oh my god.’ We did detect that,” he said. But not everyone agreed with the assessment. Wdowinski said his research is not meant to suggest certainty about what caused the collapse. The building was sinking at a rate of about 2 millimeters a year in the 1990s, and could have slowed or accelerated in the time since, he said. In his experience, even the level of sinking observed in the 1990s typically results in impacts to buildings and their structures, Wdowinski said. He believes that very well could have been the case for the Champlain building in the 1990s, based on his findings. “It was a byproduct of analyzing the data. We saw this building had some kind of unusual…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week