Connect with us

News

3rd Person Identified By Christine Ford Comes Forward, and Democrats Won’t Like What He’s Saying

Published

on

This week has been a complete and total circus in Washington DC.

At least, even more than usual, and that’s saying something.

Just in case you’ve been living under a very, very big soundproof rock, Brett Kavanaugh, the man who Trump nominated to replace Justice Kennedy on the Supreme Court and was awaiting a confirmation vote from the Senate, was accused at the last minute of sexual assault.

Trending: Obama In 2008: We Can Only Trust Mail-In Ballots If Signatures Are Verified (Watch)

From 36 years ago.

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

By a woman who doesn’t remember exactly where and when it happened and has nothing more than her testimony and what she told her husband and therapists decades later.

Oh, and those accounts conflict with what she’s saying now.

This woman, Christine Ford, originally agreed to testify on Monday but has been given until Saturday to make a final decision by Sen. Chuck Grassley who is overseeing the Senate confirmation process. She had originally requested that the FBI investigate Kavanaugh before testifying…which they’ve already done six times. A sexual assault is also not within their jurisdiction, but rather, that of the police in the location the assault would have taken place.

Now, a person identified by Ford as being in attendance at the “party” the alleged assault took place has come forward…to say that he has no knowledge of such party, let alone a drunken assault.

Conservative Tribune reports:

he left’s characterization of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is falling apart after another individual identified as being present during the alleged sexual assault by Kavanaugh has come forward and rejected the accuser’s story.

In a letter sent to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California professor Christine Blasey Ford said there were four people besides herself at the party when she was allegedly assaulted by Kavanaugh.

One of those four people, Patrick J. Smyth, a high school classmate of Kavanaugh, provided the Senate Judiciary Committee with a letter rebutting Ford’s allegations against Kavanaugh, according to CNS News.

“I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Smyth said in his statement published by CNN.

Smyth went on to claim “no knowledge” of the party Ford described.

“I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”

This makes Smyth the third person to deny any knowledge of anything even closely resembling this incident, joining Kavanaugh himself as well as his friend and former classmate Ford named as being in the room when the incident took place, Mark Judge.

If this woman’s story is true, the sad reality is, there’s absolutely nothing she can do to prove it and, whether she likes it or not, she is not entitled to hold up such an important judicial appointment because it has been emotionally challenging for her to come forward.

Sometimes, women can’t prove sexual assault, and that’s a travesty. But as soon as we “believe all women”, not only will the Democrats be able to get away with every dirty trick they can possibly imagine, but the constitutional rights of every man, as well as every woman, will no longer be valid.

Due process trumps emotions, every time.

 

Save conservative media!

News

Obama In 2008: We Can Only Trust Mail-In Ballots If Signatures Are Verified (Watch)

Ain’t that something!?

John Salvatore

Published

on

It’s pretty amazing how Democrats can flip the switch. They hated the Electoral College for a long time…until their guy “won.” Many of them, like Barack Obama and Rep. Jerry Nadler (NY), once said mail-in voting is rife with fraud. But again, because their guy “won,” they refuse to speak the truth. Cowards. Here’s what the worst president in American history said in 2008 on MSNBC, “Well, I think we have to figure out whether this is fraud proof. I mean, Oregon has a terrific mail-in system but they’ve already scanned everyone’ signature whose registered to vote so that they can check to make sure that in fact the right people are voting.” WATCH: https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1331942266018082819 LOOK: https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1332354346307108869?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1332354346307108869%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2020%2F11%2Fflashback-obama-says-mail-ballots-can-trusted-signatures-verified-video%2F Even though Dems claim voter fraud isn’t real, Nadler said in 2004 that it was very real. WATCH: View this post on Instagram After admitting this, Jerry Nadler and Democrats have so little shame that they are advocating for mail-in voting?! A post shared by Dinesh D'Souza (@dineshjdsouza) on Aug 4, 2020 at 7:40am PDT WATCH: https://twitter.com/JudiciaryGOP/status/1276216650442964994?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1276216650442964994&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fdem-rep-jerry-nadler-calls-antifa-imaginary-and-gets-dragged-by-twitter-and-destroyed-by-jim-jordan%2F

Continue Reading

News

Olbermann: You’re Absolutely ‘Right’ We Want to Criminalize Policy Differences (Watch)

The TDS may never disappear!

John Salvatore

Published

on

If you don’t agree with us, you should be ostracized or even imprisoned. That’s how the left thinks. That’s how crazy they have become. The left is clearly comprised of communists and socialists and they’re not even afraid to hide it anymore. Keith Olbermann is one of the worst they have to offer. The former ESPN host blabbered, “G– d**n it! When the policy differences are between maintaining American democracy and substituting racist, one party rule. You’re G– d**n right, we want to criminalize policy differences that might exist between the outgoing administration and the administration that is about to take over.” WATCH: https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1331426604724043777?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1331426604724043777%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fyoure-g-dn-right-we-want-to-criminalize-policy-differences-olbermann-says-out-loud-what-cnn-merely-implies%2F In short, Olbermann is a goon. To him, the only opinion that matters is the left’s. Who employs this guy, these days? WATCH: https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1314718453295702016?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1314718453295702016%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fprominent-left-winger-rants-that-amy-coney-barrett-should-be-forcibly-removed-from-our-society-will-cnns-fdabg-care%2F From New York Post: Keith Olbermann is leaving ESPN again. This time, he insisted it’s on good terms. Olbermann announced on Twitter that he will be offering political commentary on a new YouTube show, “The Worst Person in the World,” that begins on Wednesday. WATCH: https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1313602428340764672 Well, he got the title of his show correct.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week