Connect with us

Wire

5 Things Conservatives Should Know About SCOTUS Draft to Overturn Roe v. Wade

Western Journal

Published

on

Late on Monday night, left-wing news site Politico perpetrated an unprecedented leak of a major U.S. Supreme Court decision when it published the working draft of a decision that would overturn the landmark 1973 abortion ruling, Roe v. Wade.

In its May 2 article, Politico revealed the text of the draft decision written for the majority by Justice Samuel Alito, who in no uncertain terms exclaimed that “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled.”

Justice Alito went on to say that it is the “opinion of the court” that “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

Alito blasted the twin decisions of Roe and Casey saying, “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division.”

Reports say that Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett joined Alito in the majority, while Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan were in the minority, opposing the ruling. It is likely Chief Justice John Roberts will join the minority, but it is not exactly clear which way he is leaning.

But this leak is a momentous and sad moment in Supreme Court history. Even Politico notes that the leak of this decision is unprecedented.

“No draft decision in the modern history of the court has been disclosed publicly while a case was still pending. The unprecedented revelation is bound to intensify the debate over what was already the most controversial case on the docket this term,” the site wrote on Monday.

That point gives us our first of five things you must know about this draft decision.

The Leak is Meant to Intimidate the Court

As Politico noted, this is a disastrous breach of the high court’s security. But it is likely that it was leaked this far ahead of time for one big reason: to intimidate the five justices in the hopes that one or more of them will change their minds and scuttle this overturning of Roe.

Since this is a draft, not the officially filed ruling, any of the nine justices can change their minds on this case. A court ruling is only set in stone once the official ruling is published.

Some reporters are following the assumption that one of Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s clerks leaked the draft, and yet, some have even claimed it was leaked out of the office of one of the conservative justices and meant to force them to solidify their position and not waiver ahead of the filing. Whatever the reason, the Politico story has unleashed a firestorm ahead of a decision that always was going to become just that.

In fact, Alito addressed the concern about the impact the decision will have on public discourse, but he added that such fears should not stop justice.

“We cannot allow our decisions to be affected by any extraneous influences such as concern about the public’s reaction to our work,” Alito wrote in the draft. “We do not pretend to know how our political system or society will respond to today’s decision overruling Roe and Casey. And even if we could foresee what will happen, we would have no authority to let that knowledge influence our decision.”

Trump-Hating Christians Now Must Thank Trump

Christians have prayed for and worked to overturn Roe v. Wade since the day the Warren Burger Court pushed the flawed decision onto America. But it took Donald Trump having the opportunity to place three justices on the bench to get this result. All three Trump appointees — Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — helped buttress the majority decision in this draft.

Many Christians turned up their nose at Donald Trump. They felt he was too flawed as a man to support. But now these same anti-Trump Christians have Donald Trump to thank for torpedoing this abortion ruling that Christians have wanted to be ended for 50 years.

‘Roe’ Has Always Been Bad Law Based on Flawed Historical Analysis

Alito blasted Roe, saying that assessments of it as law have “ranged from the constitutionally irrelevant to the plainly incorrect.” He also wrote in the draft that Roe has had “damaging consequences.”

“The inescapable conclusion is that a right to abortion is not deeply rooted in the Nation’s history and traditions,” Alito wrote, adding that even the positions of liberals such as the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe had been critical of Roe.

Indeed, the draft also adds two pages of decisions that limited abortion made previous to the 1973 Roe ruling — decisions that liberals at the time even praised.

Alito Blasts ‘Roe’ as a Way to Keep the Black Population Down

As Politico noted, the draft ruling is a “full-throated, unflinching repudiation” of Roe. Alito even points out that many supporters of abortion previous to 1973 saw abortion as a way to keep the black population as low as possible.

Pointing to abortion’s roots in eugenics, Alito writes, “Some such supporters have been motivated by a desire to suppress the size of the African American population,” he wrote. “It is beyond dispute that Roe has had that demographic effect. A highly disproportionate percentage of aborted fetuses are black.”

Alito, though, took pains to say that the court does not intend to cast aspersions on supporters of abortion today, and wrote, “For our part, we do not question the motives of either those who have supported and those who have opposed laws restricting abortion.”

Regardless, Alito is right. Decades ago, abortion was pushed as a way to keep the black population from growing. And it has succeeded mightily in that goal.

Protecting Unlimited Abortion May Not be the Will of the People Anyway

One of the main purposes of this draft decision is to return control over abortion to the states, where the people can have the opportunity to vote on just how much or how little of it they want.

As Alito wrote, “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

The left has spent 50 years trying to fool America into thinking that every woman wants abortion protected and that abolition of abortion is somehow an act of subjugation of women. Yet they have spent the same amount of time refusing to let the people vote on the issue. They have wanted the courts to force abortion on America and have wanted to avoid the voting booth at all costs.

If Roe is overturned, that will necessarily mean that the states will once again have control over abortion, and it means that the voters will be able to select leaders that support the majority’s feelings about it.

The left is deathly afraid that women are not a monolithic bloc who will vote to maintain abortion. And they have every reason to fear that, because decades of polling have shown that abortion at will does not have unlimited support among women.

Further, it is known that women often vote more than men. In 2020, Pew Research noted that in every presidential election since 1984, women voters have turned out at a higher rate than men.

But as NPR recently noted, polls have also found that, while there is wide support for abortion during the first trimester, Americans also want restrictions on it after that period.

Finally, the recent restrictions placed on abortion in Texas and other GOP-led states in recent years have terrified the left that had likely even convinced itself that everyone loves abortion except for a small minority of religious-obsessed white men.

Regardless of how abortion levels out in the U.S.A., the high court is correct in saying that the people should have their say via the voting booth and not have the issue mandated by courts. Ending Roe is a good decision based on good law.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Wire

Private Jet Owned by Climate Alarmist Elon Musk Takes Flight of Just 31 Miles

Western Journal

Published

on

Stop it! Stop the climate change!

So says offbeat entrepreneur Elon Musk. Bill Gates, too — he’s so alarmed about the climate that he says we need to get rid of cows and eat plastic meat. Or something.

But why believe these guys? Both indulge in what Gates calls a “guilty pleasure.” Despite what they preach, Musk and Gates travel in private jets.

Last week, Musk’s jet was tracked — on Twitter, no less — flying from San Jose, California, to San Francisco. That’s about 31 miles, a flight lasting nine minutes, The Byte reported.

To be fair, there’s no record Musk was on that flight — it might have been moved for maintenance or something. But Gates’ guilty pleasure is extreme — he has four “business jets,” according to Simple Flying.

So while you save the planet chewing on a vegan burger, Gates gets to pollute the skies more than you and I probably will in several lifetimes.

Then there’s John Kerry, President Joe Biden’s go-to guy to fix the climate. He jetted aloft at least 16 times last year, and not in a government plane, but in a jet belonging to his family.

What is it with these people?

Musk’s brilliance is off the charts. And while he has some oddball ideas, Gates, of course, is also smart. But when it comes to hypocrisy and the optics of what they are doing, both are clueless.

To Musk, one of the world’s greatest threats is climate change. A carbon tax will solve that, he once told podcaster Joe Rogan.

We should tax behavior that produces carbon emissions and “the market will react in a sensible way,” Musk said, according to CNBC. “But because we don’t have a price on it, it is behaving badly.”

So rich guys like Musk can freely engage in their climate sins by offsetting their guilt with taxes? If that sounds familiar, you might recall Martin Luther and his thoughts on church sales of indulgences.

Unlike the growing number of neo-feudalists, Musk at least recognizes the potential carbon tax burdens on those who are not wealthy, who inevitably impact the climate in their little ways by heating their homes and by breathing.

Low-income users of large amounts of gas would get a carbon tax rebate, he said. And, by paying the tax, Musk is free to ride his jet. And of course, he’s one of the Good Guys since he’s saving the planet with his electric cars.

Gates, when not pushing to vaccinate everything that moves, worries about climate change, as outlined in his book “How to Avoid Climate Disaster.” Despite dumping 1,600 tons of CO2 in the atmosphere during his 59 private jet flights in 2017, he takes care of his conscience by buying clean aviation fuel and funding carbon-capture technology.

Carbon capture draws carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and then stores it until needed for some kind of beneficial economic project. Apparently, no one considers carbon dioxide being converted into oxygen by plants as having economic value.

So the Musks and Gates and Kerrys continue to fly and to buy all their cool stuff. I don’t begrudge them that.

It’s just that some of us are skeptical about human-caused climate change. What we believe has been called “fraud” by Musk, according to Futurism.

But what do you call it when the rich guys get to pour filth in the skies while preaching cleanliness to us?

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Stop it! Stop the climate change! So says offbeat entrepreneur Elon Musk. Bill Gates, too — he’s so alarmed about the climate that he says we need to get rid of cows and eat plastic meat. Or something. But why believe these guys? Both indulge in what Gates calls a “guilty pleasure.” Despite what they preach, Musk and Gates travel in private jets. Last week, Musk’s jet was tracked — on Twitter, no less — flying from San Jose, California, to San Francisco. That’s about 31 miles, a flight lasting nine minutes, The Byte reported. Landed in San Francisco, California, US. Apx. flt. time 9 Mins. pic.twitter.com/8vWvODLEOL — ElonJet (@ElonJet) May 6, 2022 To be fair, there’s no record Musk was on that flight — it might have been moved for maintenance or something. But Gates’ guilty pleasure is extreme — he has four “business jets,” according to Simple Flying. So while you save the planet chewing on a vegan burger, Gates gets to pollute the skies more than you and I probably will in several lifetimes. Then there’s John Kerry, President Joe Biden’s go-to guy to fix the climate. He jetted aloft at least 16 times last year, and not in a government plane, but in a jet belonging to his family. What is it with these people? Musk’s brilliance is off the charts. And while he has some oddball ideas, Gates, of course, is also smart. But when it comes to hypocrisy and the optics of what they are doing, both are clueless. To Musk, one of the world’s greatest threats is climate change. A carbon tax will solve that, he once told podcaster Joe Rogan. We should tax behavior that produces carbon emissions and “the market will react in a sensible way,” Musk said, according to CNBC.…

Continue Reading

Wire

Melania Trump Breaks Year-Long Public Silence to Call Out ‘Leadership’ Over ‘Heartbreaking’ Formula Shortage

Western Journal

Published

on

Former first lady Melania Trump, who spent her time in the White House calling attention to children the world forgot, said America’s infant formula shortage is “heartbreaking.”

Trump sat down with Pete Hegseth of Fox News for what is being reported as her first interview since leaving the White House, the Washington Examiner reported. The interview will air Sunday. Fox posted a clip of the interview on Friday.

“I think it’s sad to see what’s going on if you really look deeply into it,” Trump said when asked to assess the state of the country.


“I think a lot of people are struggling and suffering and what is going on around the world as well. So it’s very sad to see, and I hope it changes fast,” Trump added.

Hegseth then asked about the formula shortage.

“It’s heartbreaking to see that they are struggling and the food is not available for children in [the] 21st century in the United States of America,” Trump said.

“Why is it happening?” Hegseth asked.

“Leadership,” she said.

“Leadership or lack thereof?” he followed up.

The answer came in a heartbeat: “Yeah.”

President Joe Biden was asked Friday if his administration could have responded faster to the shortage.

“If we’d been better mind readers, I guess we could have,” he told reporters, according to CNN.

In another clip posted by Fox, Trump spoke about the media bias she faced in the White House.


Hegseth noted that Vogue magazine never featured Trump on its cover, a distinction that went to Hillary Clinton, former first lady Michelle Obama (three times), Vice President Kamala Harris and first lady Jill Biden.

“They’re biased and they have likes and dislikes, and it’s so obvious,” Trump said.

“And I think [the] American people and everyone see it. It was their decision, and I have much more important things to do — and I did in the White House — than being on the cover of Vogue.”

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Former first lady Melania Trump, who spent her time in the White House calling attention to children the world forgot, said America’s infant formula shortage is “heartbreaking.” Trump sat down with Pete Hegseth of Fox News for what is being reported as her first interview since leaving the White House, the Washington Examiner reported. The interview will air Sunday. Fox posted a clip of the interview on Friday. “I think it’s sad to see what’s going on if you really look deeply into it,” Trump said when asked to assess the state of the country. Watch the latest video at foxnews.com “I think a lot of people are struggling and suffering and what is going on around the world as well. So it’s very sad to see, and I hope it changes fast,” Trump added. Hegseth then asked about the formula shortage. “It’s heartbreaking to see that they are struggling and the food is not available for children in [the] 21st century in the United States of America,” Trump said. “Why is it happening?” Hegseth asked. “Leadership,” she said. “Leadership or lack thereof?” he followed up. The answer came in a heartbeat: “Yeah.” President Joe Biden was asked Friday if his administration could have responded faster to the shortage. “If we’d been better mind readers, I guess we could have,” he told reporters, according to CNN. In another clip posted by Fox, Trump spoke about the media bias she faced in the White House. Watch the latest video at foxnews.com Hegseth noted that Vogue magazine never featured Trump on its cover, a distinction that went to Hillary Clinton, former first lady Michelle Obama (three times), Vice President Kamala Harris and first lady Jill Biden. “They’re biased and they have likes and dislikes, and it’s so obvious,” Trump said. “And I…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week