;
Connect with us

Opinion

A Single Leader Can Ruin a Nation for Half a Century or Longer

We are in for an exceedingly rough ride, with few options for redress.

Jeff Davidson

Published

on

Before January, 2025, the worst president in American history will assume office. Someone more manipulative than Lyndon Johnson, more inept than Jimmy Carter, more devious than Bill Clinton, more treasonous than Barack Obama, and more demented than Joe Biden. Kamala Harris will wreak more devastation on America than any previous president.

History has shown us that a single leader can destroy a nation for decades, if not far longer. Led by Vladimir Lenin, when the Bolsheviks seized control of Russia in 1917, who among the citizenry could have known that misery would last for 62 years? 

Daily Distress, Long-term Suffering

After Lenin’s second stroke in 1923 and subsequent death in 1924, an even greater level of misery ensued, brought on by the dictatorial, maniacal, homicidal Joseph Stalin. He rubbed out his domestic enemies, with even his relatives included, purposely starved as many as 7,000,000 Ukrainians from 1932 to 1933, and promulgated Cold War tensions that reverberated to the late 1980s… and, in part, have since resumed with Vladimir Putin.

take our poll - story continues below

Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?

  • Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Obviously, Adolph Hitler wreaked havoc on his nation, starting in 1933, and then on the world. After 12 years, Germany, Europe, and much of the globe was in shambles. Leopold II in Belgium, Mao Ze Dong in China, Benito Mussolini in Italy, Ideki Tojo in Japan, Kim Il-Sung in North Korea, Pol Pot in Cambodia, Yakubu Gowon in Nigeria, Jean Kambanda in Rwanda, Idi Amin Dada in Uganda, Janos Mahleiro Savimbi in Angola, the Castros in Cuba, and Hugo Chavez followed by Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela, deceived, diminished, and devastated their respective countries. 

One truly bad leader can alter the fate of a nation for the span of a lifetime, if not longer. Enter the Biden/Harris Administration. Are they maniacal or homicidal? Not really, but the damage that they’ve inflicted and will continue to inflict can last for a generation if, indeed, only for that short of a time span.

No Let Up After Biden

Biden will be in office for perhaps another few months, maybe a year or two. He can’t last longer than that. The damage he’s done in four months is highly visible. Consider our southern border, the rising crime rates, the warping of our education system, the encroachment of China and Russia, the number of jobs lost, the return of inflation, his middle East bungles, and the businesses folding up shop here and moving elsewhere.

After Biden goes, Kamala Harris will become the least qualified person in the history of the presidency to assume office. This includes Zachary Taylor, Franklin Pierce, Chester Arthur, and, yes, Harry Truman (at that time). She is an elitist, and a socialist, from head to toe. She understands precious little about budgets, productivity, labor, the GNP, energy production, the national debt, foreign relations, or immigration.

How can the least qualified person we could have as president elevate to that role? She severely and rightly criticized Biden during the 2019-20 Democrat primary debates. Over all, she was a disaster in the primaries, mustered microscopic levels of support, and mercifully dropped out. Harris generated no enthusiasm whatsoever from any quarter of Democrat constituents. Then, chosen by his handlers to be his running mate, she praised Biden to the high-hilt as if she had never spoken a word against him.

Yes, we could have been beset with Elizabeth Warren, Maxine Waters, or God forbid, Nancy Pelosi as the first female president. However, fate has dealt us Kamala Harris, and fate, indeed, can be cruel. 

The Shirker-in-Chief

In four months of the Biden/Harris Administration, she has avoided taking her assigned lead on the border situation, completely shirking the role. Harris deflects serious questions with aplomb, certainly more adeptly than the bumbling Biden. She is the epitome of the privileged class, playing the ‘woman of color’ card as needed. Her record in California and rise in West Coast politics speaks for itself; sleeping with Willie Brown to gain career favors while incarcerating black men at unprecedented levels. 

She is not two-faced; three or four faces is more like it. Each of them are unable to control her unprovoked laughter at inappropriate moments. When asked about the dilemma of working parents who have to continue to homeschool their children, she immediately burst out in laughter. Experts say that she likely suffers from pseudobulbar affect, but that doesn’t tell the whole story.

Fasten Your Safety Belt

We are in for an exceedingly rough ride, with few options for redress. By fate, perhaps, we’ll retake the House and Senate in 2022, hold the Supreme Court, and gain governorships and state legislatures. Until then, it’s a bare knuckles ride, down a slippery slope, in hazardous waters. 

 

News

Lee Greenwood Booted from Arts Council by Biden Administration

What?!

Published

on

If there is one thing that the Biden administration is superb at, it’s putting its foot right in its mouth.

Maybe this was to be expected.  Biden is, after all, the most gaffe-prone President that our nation has ever seen.  But the sheer ignorance the team maintains for PR issues is still astounding, and this week was no exception.

President Joe Biden on Wednesday removed country music singer/songwriter Lee Greenwood from the National Endowment for the Arts.

Greenwood was first appointed by President George W Bush in 2008. Greenwood was reappointed to six-year terms by both Presidents Barack Obama and Donald J Trump.

take our poll - story continues below

Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?

  • Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“You know, it’s a six-year appointment and I was appointed by George W. Bush 43,” Greenwood told Fox and Friends. “So I served under his term. Also, President Obama’s term. Of course, President Trump’s term.”

Greenwood was shocked by the move.

The singer’s most renowned hit was “God Bless The USA”, and was a feature of a great many of Donald Trump’s political rallies, making this move by the Biden administration appear terribly petty.

But, for a White House that appears to be completely unaware of their own image, why would we expect anything different?

If there is one thing that the Biden administration is superb at, it’s putting its foot right in its mouth. Maybe this was to be expected.  Biden is, after all, the most gaffe-prone President that our nation has ever seen.  But the sheer ignorance the team maintains for PR issues is still astounding, and this week was no exception. President Joe Biden on Wednesday removed country music singer/songwriter Lee Greenwood from the National Endowment for the Arts. Greenwood was first appointed by President George W Bush in 2008. Greenwood was reappointed to six-year terms by both Presidents Barack Obama and Donald J Trump. “You know, it’s a six-year appointment and I was appointed by George W. Bush 43,” Greenwood told Fox and Friends. “So I served under his term. Also, President Obama’s term. Of course, President Trump’s term.” Greenwood was shocked by the move. The singer’s most renowned hit was “God Bless The USA”, and was a feature of a great many of Donald Trump’s political rallies, making this move by the Biden administration appear terribly petty. But, for a White House that appears to be completely unaware of their own image, why would we expect anything different?

Continue Reading

Opinion

Taliban Will Bring Back Amputations and Executions as Punishment

This is the Biden legacy in Afghanistan at work. 

Published

on

In a lame attempt to soften the blow of bungling the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, the Biden White House began peddling a downright offensive storyline in which this new Taliban would operate in a much more benevolent way than they did during their first reign in the 1990’s.

This appeared to be some sort of consolation prize in the eyes of the administration.  Hey, we really screwed the pooch on this one…at least they said they’ll be nicer.

Of course, it only took a few weeks for this charade to go belly-up, and now the Taliban appears to be back to their old tricks.

One of the founders of the Taliban and the chief enforcer of its harsh interpretation of Islamic law when they last ruled Afghanistan said the hard-line movement will once again carry out executions and amputations of hands, though perhaps not in public.

take our poll - story continues below

Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?

  • Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

In an interview with The Associated Press, Mullah Nooruddin Turabi dismissed outrage over the Taliban’s executions in the past, which sometimes took place in front of crowds at a stadium, and he warned the world against interfering with Afghanistan’s new rulers.

There was no mistaking the intent.

“Everyone criticized us for the punishments in the stadium, but we have never said anything about their laws and their punishments,” Turabi told The Associated Press, speaking in Kabul. “No one will tell us what our laws should be. We will follow Islam and we will make our laws on the Quran.”

The Taliban had previously suggested that women refrain from leaving their homes, as their own soldiers weren’t well enough trained to keep from assaulting them.

 

In a lame attempt to soften the blow of bungling the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, the Biden White House began peddling a downright offensive storyline in which this new Taliban would operate in a much more benevolent way than they did during their first reign in the 1990’s. This appeared to be some sort of consolation prize in the eyes of the administration.  Hey, we really screwed the pooch on this one…at least they said they’ll be nicer. Of course, it only took a few weeks for this charade to go belly-up, and now the Taliban appears to be back to their old tricks. One of the founders of the Taliban and the chief enforcer of its harsh interpretation of Islamic law when they last ruled Afghanistan said the hard-line movement will once again carry out executions and amputations of hands, though perhaps not in public. In an interview with The Associated Press, Mullah Nooruddin Turabi dismissed outrage over the Taliban’s executions in the past, which sometimes took place in front of crowds at a stadium, and he warned the world against interfering with Afghanistan’s new rulers. There was no mistaking the intent. “Everyone criticized us for the punishments in the stadium, but we have never said anything about their laws and their punishments,” Turabi told The Associated Press, speaking in Kabul. “No one will tell us what our laws should be. We will follow Islam and we will make our laws on the Quran.” The Taliban had previously suggested that women refrain from leaving their homes, as their own soldiers weren’t well enough trained to keep from assaulting them.  

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week