Connect with us

News

ABC Correspondent Says it Would be ‘Illegitimate’ to Overturn Roe v. Wade. The Reason Why is Ridiculous.

Published

on

On Friday, ABC News chief foreign correspondent Terry Moran sat down for a chat with George Stephanopoulous to discuss the possibility of Judge Brett Kavanaugh being placed on the Supreme Court.

During the course of the conversation the topic of Roe v. Wade came up, where Moran stated that if Kavanaugh got put on the bench and they overturned the ruling, it would be illegitimate. The reason why? Because it would be a “male majority” court.

Yes, stopping the slaughter of innocent children wouldn’t be legitimate, simply because it was men putting a stop to it. Well, perhaps if the vast majority of modern day women weren’t so enamored with the idea of being able to murder their unborn children for the sake of convenience, this particular “male majority” court decision wouldn’t be necessary.

Trending: 38 People May Face Criminals Charges Now That State Dept. Has Completed Probe Into Hillary’s Emails

STEPHANOPOULOS: Let’s say for the sake of argument, for just this minute right here, that he does get through – that it is a 51, perhaps, 49 partisan vote. What does he do in that situation as he ascends to the highest court in the land?

take our poll - story continues below

Has Adam Schiff committed fraud and treason concerning the Trump probe?

  • Has Adam Schiff committed fraud and treason concerning the Trump probe?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

MORAN: Well, he had better take into that lifetime appointment a sense of the woundedness of so many people in the country, and factor that into his decisions. Overturning Roe v. Wade by an all male majority, two of whom have had credible accusations of sexual misconduct lodged against them, would not be a legitimate action, and that is the question of the court – legitimacy. It has always had a very high place in American popular opinion and it could lose it if it loses legitimacy.

First, he suggests that “overturning Roe v. Wade” with a “male majority” on the court would be illegitimate. This is a variation of the “no uterus, no opinion” argument often made by abortion advocates in which it’s claimed that if one does not possess a female reproductive system, one is not allowed to make judgments about abortion. The irony of this argument is that Roe v. Wade was decided by an all-male Supreme Court. In other words, “no uterus, no opinion (unless that opinion aligns with abortion advocates).”

Second, Moran states that if Kavanaugh were to pass through the Senate, two SCOTUS Justices will have had “credible accusations of sexual misconduct lodged against them.” While the accusations against Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh are indeed serious, they are not necessarily “credible.”

Third, Moran suggests that Kavanaugh, if he is appointed to the Supreme Court, must take into account “the woundedness of so many people in the country, and factor that into his decisions.” This is a dangerously warped perspective regarding the role of the Supreme Court, which was designed to function as an impartial arbiter, unresponsive to the whims of lawmakers or executives whose legislation and behavior might violate the Constitution of the United States.

Moran’s name is dangerously close in spelling to a specific word in the English language that perfectly describes those who hold to the ideology he is espousing here in this little pow wow. Get it?

Abortion is the scourge of our day. It’s the Civil Rights issue of modern America. If we don’t do something soon to end it, how in the world can we, with a straight face, expect God to bless our nation?

Source: Daily Wire

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Kamala Says Giuliani Broke ‘Many Laws,’ Then Admits She Doesn’t Know Which Ones (Video)

So, which is it?

John Salvatore

Published

on

This guy is connected to Donald Hitler Trump. Of course he broke many laws. Which ones? How should I know, Anderson? I’m just out here saying whatever liberals want me to say. I don’t even really know why I’m running for office! That’s my Kamala Harris impression. Spot on, right? LOL. The California progressive has no shot at earning the Democrat nomination. Like all other Dems, Kamala talks and talks but has no real answers for any question. How can you say a man broke “many laws” and then not know which laws he broke? Is this a case of guilty before proven innocent? Sure sounds like it. From Daily Wire: Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris claimed during a Friday interview on CNN that Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani had “broken many laws,” but, when pressed on what specific laws she thinks that he has broken, Harris struggled to give any examples. Harris appeared on “Anderson Cooper 360°” where she was asked about recent reports alleging that Giuliani is under federal investigation over his business dealings in Ukraine after two men that he was allegedly connected to were arrested by federal authorities. WATCH: Kamala Harris claims that Rudy Giuliani has “broken many laws” CNN’s Anderson Cooper asks her what laws he has broken Harris responds: “Well, I, I, I don’t know” https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1185379995130175488?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1185379995130175488&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Fharris-claims-giuliani-has-broken-many-laws-cant-name-any Check out Kamala getting told off by an elderly woman… From Daily Wire: An elderly woman living in a nursing home blasted Democrat presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris (CA) over her health care plan on Monday during a campaign stop at the Bickford Senior Living Center in Muscatine, Iowa. WOMAN: “Can I ask you a question? I understand that you are advocating health care for everyone.” Harris: “Yes, ma’am.” WOMAN: “Who’s going to pay for it?” HARRIS: “Well, we’re…

Continue Reading

News

Trump Scraps G-7 Meeting At His Doral Resort, Blasts Media & Dems for ‘Irrational Hostility’

A win for the left?

John Salvatore

Published

on

President Trump wanted to host next year’s G-7 Summit at his resort in Miami. That’s not happening anymore. As with all things Trump, the left had a conniption. What POTUS did was avoid a future headache. Trump made it clear on Twitter on Saturday night how upset he was with Dems and the mainstream media for causing yet another uproar. He also noted that this arrangement would have come at “ZERO COST to the USA.” But, it’s a done deal. Game over. No G-7 at Doral. 45’s tweets: I thought I was doing something very good for our Country by using Trump National Doral, in Miami, for hosting the G-7 Leaders. It is big, grand, on hundreds of acres, next to MIAMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, has tremendous ballrooms & meeting rooms, and each delegation would have… https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1185726930764611589 …..its own 50 to 70 unit building. Would set up better than other alternatives. I announced that I would be willing to do it at NO PROFIT or, if legally permissible, at ZERO COST to the USA. But, as usual, the Hostile Media & their Democrat Partners went CRAZY! https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1185726931611852802 ….Therefore, based on both Media & Democrat Crazed and Irrational Hostility, we will no longer consider Trump National Doral, Miami, as the Host Site for the G-7 in 2020. We will begin the search for another site, including the possibility of Camp David, immediately. Thank you! https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1185735579327193093 More from Fox News: Trump first made the suggestion to have the 2020 G7 at his Doral resort in August at the 2019 summit in France, sparking controversy over the ethics of a president profiting off an official government event. One day after Mulvaney’s announcement, a trio of Democratic lawmakers introduced legislation to block the president from hosting next year’s summit. Reps. Lois Frankel from Florida, Bennie…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend