Connect with us

News

AG Barr Says The 2020 Election Won’t Delay Report From John Durham

Published

on

During a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, Attorney General Bill Barr would not commit to holding off on the release of a report put together by U.S. Attorney John Durham until the end of the 2020 election.

After hours of being grilled by Democrats in which Barr was repeatedly cut off and not allowed to fully answer important questions, the attorney general rejected the notion that releasing the Durham report from his criminal inquiry into the Russia probe before the end of the election would amount to election interference.

Of course, it’s okay for the left to utilize the mainstream media and social media platforms to try and suppress information and allow liberal news sources to have free reign and influence the election. Hypocrisy at its finest.

Trending: Chuck Schumer Says Dems Will Sue If Trump Issues EO to Give Americans COVID-19 ‘Relief’

Here’s more on this from The Washington Examiner:

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Under oath, do you commit to not releasing any report by Mr. Durham before the November election?” Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, a Florida Democrat, asked the attorney general.

“No,” Barr replied. When asked again, he repeated, “No. I will be very careful.”

During cross-talk between Mucarsel-Powell and Barr, the Florida Democrat claimed the attorney general was saying, “you won’t go by Justice Department policy that you won’t interfere in any political investigations before the election.” Barr reiterated, “We’re not going to interfere — in fact, I’ve made it clear that we’re not going to tolerate interference.”

Mucarsel-Powell fired back with, “But under oath, you’re saying that you do not commit to not releasing a report by Dunham.”

Barr replied by saying, “Any report will be, in my judgment, not one that is covered by the policy and would disrupt the election. I’ve already made it clear that neither candidate is under investigation.”

The left is obviously trying hard to keep Dunham’s report from seeing the light of day. Why? Why are they so terrified of this information coming out and being broadcast to the nation? There has to be something in it that makes Democrats nervous. Clearly, they are afraid whatever it is will sway voters to stand with Trump.

Could there be any more reason to release the report?

Save conservative media!

News

Man Arrested for Rape Is Let Out of Jail Over COVID-19, Then Murders the Woman He Raped

Still want to let criminals out?

John Salvatore

Published

on

Democrat policies made this unfortunate story possible. Liberal “leaders” won’t take any of the blame, though. Sure, the only person to commit a criminal act was Ibrahim Bouaichi, but he shouldn’t have been released from jail in the first place. Are Dems still cool with freeing bad people? From TDW: A Maryland man being held in a Virginia prison on rape charges was released over coronavirus concerns, then allegedly murdered his accuser, according to police. Police tracked down and found Ibrahim Bouaichi, 33, in Prince George’s County, Maryland, on Wednesday. Authorities sought Bouaichi in connection with the death of Karla Dominguez, who had accused Bouaichi of rape and testified against him in October, according to The Washington Post. CONTINUED: When police located Bouaichi, he fled in his car until he crashed. Police moving to arrest him found that he had apparently shot himself. Bouaichi remained in critical condition on Thursday. Partly on Dominguez’s testimony, Bouaichi was indicted on five felony charges of rape, sodomy, strangulation, abduction, and burglary. Bouaichi was held without bail in an Alexandria prison facility until April 9, when Circuit Court Judge Nolan Dawkins ordered his release on a $25,000 bond. VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbFRilEUmps

Continue Reading

News

Rashida Tlaib Forced to Repay Campaign Nearly $11,000 for Illegal Disbursements to Herself

Busted.

John Salvatore

Published

on

If Rashida Tlaib was a Republican and got caught illegal distributing funds from a campaign, there would be calls for her immediate resignation. But she’s a Democrat – so it’s all good! From Fox News: Rep. Rashida Tlaib has been ordered to repay $10,800 to her campaign committee to account for the salary she had paid herself from her campaign coffers after she had been elected to Congress in 2018. The bipartisan House Ethics Committee found the Michigan Democrat’s violation “was one of bad timing and not ill intent.” The committee ordered her to pay $10,800 of the $17,500 she received from her campaign in 2018. Congressional candidates are allowed to draw paychecks from their campaigns, but payments are only allowed during an active candidacy. Continued: “The committee did not find that she sought to unjustly enrich herself by receiving the campaign funds at issue,” the committee wrote Friday. “Indeed, during her campaign, Representative Tlaib received a conservative amount of campaign funds, well below the legal threshold for the maximum amount of salary she was eligible to receive; these payments allowed her to forego her salary from her full-time employment so that she could fully participate in campaign activities.” LOOK: https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1245428215751065602?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1245428215751065602&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fbrettt-3136%2F2020%2F04%2F01%2Frep-rashida-tlaib-reminds-us-the-covid-19-pandemic-is-exposing-structural-racism-in-the-us%2F REACTIONS:

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend