Connect with us

News

Andrew Cuomo Looks Into Camera, Says We Didn’t Have Natural Disasters Before ‘Climate Change’

What planet does he live on??

John Salvatore

Published

on

Democrats aren’t going to let this “climate change” thing go anytime soon. They’re in too deep, at this point. They’ve struck a nerve with the politically uninformed involving conservatives killing the planet, and they are going to drive that point home until the end of time.

What’s great is that liberals can no longer talk about the polar bear population being in decline. The animal’s were the poster child for the ridiculous movement for a good while. But it was recently learned that their numbers are on the rise. Go figure.

Check out New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, a raging far-left Democrat if there ever was one, who may have just given us the quote of the year…

Trending: McAfee Dead in Prison After Repeatedly Declaring He Would Not Kill Himself

From Daily Caller:

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration? (1)

  • Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Democratic New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo blamed climate change for damaging floods in upstate New York, and claimed that natural disasters didn’t happen before climate change.

“Ali, anyone who questions extreme weather and climate change is just delusional at this point,” Cuomo told MSNBC anchor Ali Velshi. ” We have seen in the State of New York and we have seen — it is something we never had before.”

WATCH:

Don’t forget, Ocasio-Cortez has told us many times over that the earth won’t last much longer if it keeps getting hotter outside – LOL. If these Democrats can’t find something to whine about it’s as if they’re not happy. But they’re never happy, so…

WATCH:

[email protected], near tears: My dreams of motherhood “now tastes bittersweet” because of global warming

Yet she flew to Denmark on a jet instead of doing the eco-friendly Skype-in? That’s consistent.

I’m assuming she flew to Copenhagen on unicorn farts (no methane in those, gang. Relax.)

“I cried on the entire flight to Copenhagen just thinking about it.”

How did @AOC get to Copenhagen? Also, please don’t have kids. You’ve ruined enough of them already, you don’t need to ruin one more.

She also could have spoken to them via video instead of increasing the carbon in the environment by flying there. What a hypocrite! #crocodiletears

H/T: Twitchy

News

McAfee Dead in Prison After Repeatedly Declaring He Would Not Kill Himself

Social media users were quick to remind the world of McAfee’s own words.

Published

on

John McAfee is a computing legend, having pioneered the way in which systems and networks protect themselves from viruses, malware, spyware, and all the other assorted evils of this internet age. But now he lies dead, having allegedly committed suicide in a Spanish prison cell. Antivirus software tycoon John McAfee died by an apparent suicide in a Spanish jail cell Wednesday evening — hours after reports surfaced that he would be extradited to face federal charges in the US, according to local media. The eccentric tech entrepreneur was arrested in October and was awaiting extradition when he was found dead, police sources told the newspaper El Pais. The newspaper reported McAfee was pulled from his cell in Barcelona and police are investigating the circumstances around his death. Authorities aren’t shying away from calling it a suicide already. “Everything points to suicide,” the newspaper reported, citing justice department officials in the country. A second Spanish newspaper, El Mundo, also reported McAfee had died by an apparent suicide in the jail. But here is where it gets strange:  McAfee has been utterly insistent and consistent about the fact that he would never, ever take his own life, explicitly telling his followers on social media that, should he ever be found dead of suicide, he was killed. https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/1316801215083225096?s=20 https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/1200864283766251521?s=20 https://twitter.com/truthcrumbs/status/1407788935628079113?s=20 The investigation is ongoing at this time.

Continue Reading

News

Lab Finds Zero Fish DNA After Testing Subway’s Tuna Sandwich

You can “eat fresh” at Subway, but can you eat fish?

Published

on

For years we’ve told ourselves that there has to be a better way to do fast food.  Or, at the very least, a healthier way. And so new chains are constantly popping up, while the old staples adapt.  There are salads for sale as places like McDonald’s these days, which is something that kids who grew up in the 80’s might have had a hard time believing would ever occur. In the realm of healthy fast food, there is but one king:  The unbreakable Subway.  Not only did the brand survive having a pedophile as their spokesperson, but they currently operate more physical restaurants in the world than even the aforementioned burger purveyor. But an alarming new study has some wondering if, while they were “eating fresh” with a tuna sub, they were even eating fish. The New York Times published a report Sunday, which revealed that lab tests didn’t find “amplifiable tuna DNA” in Subway’s infamous tuna sandwich. NYT submitted “60 inches worth of Subway tuna sandwiches” from three separate Los Angeles locations for lab analysis in wake of the lawsuit filed earlier this year alleging the sandwich chain was serving customers “a mixture of various concoctions that do not constitute tuna.” The suit claims that independent lab tests showed the company meant to “imitate” tuna’s appearance by blending together these unknown ingredients. The study, commissioned by NYT, failed to not only identify tuna DNA, but the lab couldn’t even determine the origins of the fish in the provided sandwiches. “No amplifiable tuna DNA was present in the sample and so we obtained no amplification products from the DNA. Therefore, we cannot identify the species,” the results read. But it’s not all bad news: “There’s two conclusions. One, it’s so heavily processed that whatever we could pull out, we couldn’t make an…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week