Connect with us

News

Another activist judge using their power to create law from the bench

Naturally, the left celebrated the decision.

Published

on

President Barack Obama tried very hard to legitimize transgenderism by using his power to force schools to cater to kids claiming to “identify” as a different sex form which they were born.

But, thanks to President Donald Trump, that dream has skidded to a halt. But that doesn’t mean the left-wing judiciary won’t keep trying to force the left’s agenda on all of us and here we have a perfect example of that.

This week, another liberal federal judge has aligned herself with the corrupt Obama agenda and sided with a teenager who claims to be transgender and who wants to force a school to allow transgenders to pick any bathroom they feel like using at any given time.

Trending: Protester Sucker Punches Trump Supporter, Then Winds Up Flat On His Back — WATCH

U.S. District Court Judge Arenda Wright Allen, a federal judge appointed by Barak Obama in Newport News, Virginia, handed down an activist ruling, one that was not based on the merits of the case at all.

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

As Daily Caller reported, the ruling is a “boon to the LGBT community”:

The case was occasioned when Gavin Grimm, a 19-year-old student in the Gloucester County Public Schools, began using the men’s bathroom at his public high school. Grimm, who has since graduated, was born female but identifies as male. Gloucester Country schools require transgender students to use alternative facilities or the bathrooms is use by other members of their biological sex

Grimm claims the district’s policy violates Title IX, which bans gender discrimination in education, and the Constitution’s equal protection clause. The Obama administration issued Title IX guidance requiring public schools to allow trans students access to bathrooms corresponding to their stated gender in May 2016.

President Obama tried to make pro-transgender rules for our schools using his power to regulate our education establishment.

In 2016, Obama tried to warp federal Title IX rules to force all schools to accept trasgenderism whether local school boards and parents wanted such rules or not. In May of 2016 Obama decreed that all public schools in the country must welcome a tiny number of apparently transgender children by taking single-sex bathrooms, single-sex locker rooms and sexual privacy away from almost 55 million American kids in 100,000 K-12 public schools.

Several kids tried to use Obama’s rules to force schools to cater to their desires. Many schools buckled, but some had lawsuits filed against them based on Obama’s ruling. Some of these cases even ended up headed toward the U.S. Supreme Court.

Fortunately, as soon as Trump took office, he revoked Obama’s liberal rules. But, because Trump dumped Obama’s school rules, the U.S. Supreme Court decided not to hear the case. The SCOTUS sent the case back to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals after Trump canceled Obama’s absurd rules.

But, despite that Obama’s federal regulations were ended by Trump, that hasn’t stopped sold-out, left-wing judges from trying to force the liberal agenda on us anyway.

Hence, the latest pro-transgender judge has endorsed the left’s claim that transgenders are protected under the law:

The decision endorses a relatively new civil rights theory arguing discrimination against trans people is already illegal as a matter of federal law. Title IX and other federal statutes like the Civil Rights Act forbid discrimination on the basis of sex. Such discrimination includes gender stereotyping or discriminating against individuals for failing to conform to expectations about sex. The Supreme Court affirmed this reading of the law in a 1988 case, Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins.

Since discrimination against LGBT groups arises from gender stereotyping — which is already unlawful — proponents of the theory say anti-trans discrimination in the workplace and in public schools is already illegal.

With her ruling, Judge Allen agreed with this novel approach to the law and insisted that it gives Grimm the right to force the school to do whatever she wants it to do.

“After full consideration of the facts presented and the compelling scope of relevant legal analyses, the court concludes that Mr. Grimm has sufficiently pled a Title IX claim of sex discrimination under a gender stereotyping theory,” Judge Allen wrote.

Allen also slammed the school’s policy saying it violates the law.

The court also found Grimm is protected by the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection. Laws that treat individuals differently on the basis of sex are subject to high judicial scrutiny and are only permissible if they serve an important government interest. The school board said their policy protects its interest in student bathroom privacy, but Allen disagreed.

“The policy was not substantially related to protecting other students’ privacy rights, because there were many other ways to protect privacy interests in a non-discriminatory and more effective manner than barring Mr. Grimm from using the boys’ restrooms,” Allen wrote in his decision. “The board’s argument that the policy did not discriminate against any one class of students is resoundingly unpersuasive.”

Naturally, the student was ecstatic. “After fighting this policy since I was 15 years old, I finally have a court decision saying that what the Gloucester County School Board did to me was wrong and it was against the law,” Grimm said.

This is hardly the first time that Judge Allen has used her position in the legal system to force liberal activism on the country. In 2014 she was the judge who struck down Virginia’s ban on same-sex marriage.

In her ruling meant to cancel the state’s gay marriage ban, Allen wrote that same-sex “relationships are created through the exercise of sacred, personal choices — choices, like the choices made by every other citizen, that must be free from unwarranted government interference.”

Naturally, the left celebrated the decision.

What we have here is yet another activist judge that uses her power to create law from the bench quite despite what the rest of us want.

Save conservative media!

News

New Video Posted By President Trump Proves He’s Denounced White Supremacy Over And Over Again

Published

on

President Trump released a video Tuesday that completely annihilates the left-wing narrative promoted in the mainstream media that he is a racist who supports and promotes white supremacy. Many folks in the MSM have made the accusation that the president has not condemned white supremacy, but this video showcases all of the times he’s done just that. Here’s more on the video from the Daily Wire: “The Trump campaign rolled out a nearly 5-minute-long video of the president, featuring video clips from as recently as this month, to his 2016 presidential campaign, and dating all the way back to an interview Trump gave to Matt Lauer in the early 2000s, where he denounced White supremacy and ‘disavowed’ White supremacist groups,” Fox News reported. “The video comes after Biden and Harris have criticized Trump, casting him as a racist and claiming he has not denounced White supremacy, and also comes as part of the Trump campaign’s final pitch to win over Black voters ahead of Election Day.” The video actually details 38 examples of when Trump denounced white supremacy. Here’s just a few of the ones covered in the clip.   From recent NBC News townhall: “I denounce white supremacy, okay?” From recent NBC News townhall: “Are you listening? I denounce white supremacy. What’s your next question?” From recent NBC News townhall: “I denounce white supremacy.” From recent NBC News townhall: “You start off with white supremacy, I denounce it.” https://youtu.be/Bd0cMmBvqWc Folks, the mainstream media is never going to ditch their anti-Trump racist narrative, regardless of how false it actually is. They believe this is one of their strongest strategies against the president and have worked hard, investing much time and energy, into covering this narrative and brainwashing their viewing audience with it. But it’s not true. Clearly, the president is…

Continue Reading

News

Tony Bobulinski Makes Explosive Claims On Tucker Carlson’s Show, Media Skips Story

Published

on

Critics are having a hard time wrapping their minds around the fact that the mainstream media is choosing to ignore the Tucker Carlson interview with Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of Hunter Biden, who stated that the Biden family casually shrugged off any worries that Joe Biden’s ties to all of his son’s business deals might have a negative impact on future presidential campaigns. This, of course, raises questions as to whether or not the MSM is worthy of public trust. Given the kind of anti-Trump coverage we’ve seen over the last few years, and the total destruction of journalistic integrity and ethics, the answer to that question should easily be “no.” via Fox News: Bobulinski’s comments to Carlson were completely ignored by CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times and Washington Post as of 8 a.m. EST on Wednesday, exactly 12 hours after the start of the damning interview. “It is pretty much a 100 percent blackout of the Bobulinski story in the traditional media. Of course, there are lots of stories that need to be covered in the busy 2020 news agenda, but the total omission of Bobulinski’s accusations is curious, to say the least,” DePauw University professor and media critic Jeffrey McCall told Fox News. “Even if this story is not front and center on the news agenda, it does need to be approached somewhere along the way. Odds are that most mainstream media outlets are devoting very few reporting resources, if any, to the Bobulinski story,” McCall added. “It would seem those outlets could at least be investigating the accusations to try to prove them invalid.” “What little coverage has surfaced has basically just been running without challenge the boilerplate denials and indignation from the Biden camp. The manner in which this story has been covered…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week