Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

Another activist judge using their power to create law from the bench

Naturally, the left celebrated the decision.

Published

on

President Barack Obama tried very hard to legitimize transgenderism by using his power to force schools to cater to kids claiming to “identify” as a different sex form which they were born.

But, thanks to President Donald Trump, that dream has skidded to a halt. But that doesn’t mean the left-wing judiciary won’t keep trying to force the left’s agenda on all of us and here we have a perfect example of that.

This week, another liberal federal judge has aligned herself with the corrupt Obama agenda and sided with a teenager who claims to be transgender and who wants to force a school to allow transgenders to pick any bathroom they feel like using at any given time.

take our poll - story continues below

Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?

  • Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Actor’s Hate Hoax Planned After Previous Propaganda Effort Was Panned

U.S. District Court Judge Arenda Wright Allen, a federal judge appointed by Barak Obama in Newport News, Virginia, handed down an activist ruling, one that was not based on the merits of the case at all.

As Daily Caller reported, the ruling is a “boon to the LGBT community”:

The case was occasioned when Gavin Grimm, a 19-year-old student in the Gloucester County Public Schools, began using the men’s bathroom at his public high school. Grimm, who has since graduated, was born female but identifies as male. Gloucester Country schools require transgender students to use alternative facilities or the bathrooms is use by other members of their biological sex

Grimm claims the district’s policy violates Title IX, which bans gender discrimination in education, and the Constitution’s equal protection clause. The Obama administration issued Title IX guidance requiring public schools to allow trans students access to bathrooms corresponding to their stated gender in May 2016.

President Obama tried to make pro-transgender rules for our schools using his power to regulate our education establishment.

In 2016, Obama tried to warp federal Title IX rules to force all schools to accept trasgenderism whether local school boards and parents wanted such rules or not. In May of 2016 Obama decreed that all public schools in the country must welcome a tiny number of apparently transgender children by taking single-sex bathrooms, single-sex locker rooms and sexual privacy away from almost 55 million American kids in 100,000 K-12 public schools.

Several kids tried to use Obama’s rules to force schools to cater to their desires. Many schools buckled, but some had lawsuits filed against them based on Obama’s ruling. Some of these cases even ended up headed toward the U.S. Supreme Court.

Fortunately, as soon as Trump took office, he revoked Obama’s liberal rules. But, because Trump dumped Obama’s school rules, the U.S. Supreme Court decided not to hear the case. The SCOTUS sent the case back to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals after Trump canceled Obama’s absurd rules.

But, despite that Obama’s federal regulations were ended by Trump, that hasn’t stopped sold-out, left-wing judges from trying to force the liberal agenda on us anyway.

Hence, the latest pro-transgender judge has endorsed the left’s claim that transgenders are protected under the law:

The decision endorses a relatively new civil rights theory arguing discrimination against trans people is already illegal as a matter of federal law. Title IX and other federal statutes like the Civil Rights Act forbid discrimination on the basis of sex. Such discrimination includes gender stereotyping or discriminating against individuals for failing to conform to expectations about sex. The Supreme Court affirmed this reading of the law in a 1988 case, Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins.

Since discrimination against LGBT groups arises from gender stereotyping — which is already unlawful — proponents of the theory say anti-trans discrimination in the workplace and in public schools is already illegal.

With her ruling, Judge Allen agreed with this novel approach to the law and insisted that it gives Grimm the right to force the school to do whatever she wants it to do.

“After full consideration of the facts presented and the compelling scope of relevant legal analyses, the court concludes that Mr. Grimm has sufficiently pled a Title IX claim of sex discrimination under a gender stereotyping theory,” Judge Allen wrote.

Allen also slammed the school’s policy saying it violates the law.

The court also found Grimm is protected by the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection. Laws that treat individuals differently on the basis of sex are subject to high judicial scrutiny and are only permissible if they serve an important government interest. The school board said their policy protects its interest in student bathroom privacy, but Allen disagreed.

“The policy was not substantially related to protecting other students’ privacy rights, because there were many other ways to protect privacy interests in a non-discriminatory and more effective manner than barring Mr. Grimm from using the boys’ restrooms,” Allen wrote in his decision. “The board’s argument that the policy did not discriminate against any one class of students is resoundingly unpersuasive.”

Naturally, the student was ecstatic. “After fighting this policy since I was 15 years old, I finally have a court decision saying that what the Gloucester County School Board did to me was wrong and it was against the law,” Grimm said.

This is hardly the first time that Judge Allen has used her position in the legal system to force liberal activism on the country. In 2014 she was the judge who struck down Virginia’s ban on same-sex marriage.

In her ruling meant to cancel the state’s gay marriage ban, Allen wrote that same-sex “relationships are created through the exercise of sacred, personal choices — choices, like the choices made by every other citizen, that must be free from unwarranted government interference.”

Naturally, the left celebrated the decision.

What we have here is yet another activist judge that uses her power to create law from the bench quite despite what the rest of us want.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

News

Lawyer for Covington Kid Brings $250 Million Defamation Suit Against ‘Washington Post’

Sandmann’s lawyer, Lin Wood, added that more lawsuits would be filed against other news sources and even some entertainers in the coming weeks.

Published

on

MAGA

A lawyer for one of the Covington Catholic kids falsely accused of being a “racist” against a group of Native Americans in Washington D.C. is now suing the Washington Post for defamation… for a whopping 250 million bucks.

You’ll recall that the whole left-wing media establishment jumped to the conclusions that a group of Catholic school kids from Kentucky were “racists” when video broke that liberals claimed showed the teens “mocking” a group of Native Americans led by notorious liar Nathan Phillips.

“News” outlets such as the Washington Post immediately branded the kids as white privilege-infused racists. The accusation was slammed home when the media began selling the lies of the leader of the Indian group, Nathan Phillips.

take our poll - story continues below

Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?

  • Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Phillips stampeded to every camera he could find to tell the media that the boys yelled racist, Trump slogans at him, that they threateningly “blocked” his movements, and that they mocked and intimidated him and his group.

But over the ensuing days, more and longer videos of the encounter between the school boys and the Native Americans came out that proved exactly the opposite of the original claims. Indeed, it was the kids who were accosted by the activists — including a group of black radicals that had been calling the boys names for half an hour before the Indians even showed up.

Sadly, the ignoramuses at the Covington Diocese immediately joined the left-wing media in denouncing the boys as racists. But, after the other videos emerged, the Catholic authorities launched an investigation that eventually cleared the boys of all wrongdoing.

“We found no evidence of offensive or racist statements by students to Mr. Phillips or members of his group,” the Church report said. “Some students performed a ‘tomahawk chop’ to the beat of Mr. Phillips’ drumming and some joined in Mr. Phillips’ chant.”

Now the main schoolboy who was accused of racism, Nick Sandmann, is suing those who attacked him unfairly and without proof.

According to the Washington Times:

“Nick Sandmann is 16 years old & has 2½+ years to identify accusers & sue them,” Atlanta attorney L. Lin Wood said Saturday on Twitter. “No member of mainstream & social media mob who attacked him should take comfort from not being sued in initial round of lawsuits which will commence next week. Time is Nick’s friend, not his enemy.”

Also, according to Reuters:

The lawsuit claims that the newspaper “wrongfully targeted and bullied” the teen to advance its bias against President Donald Trump because Sandmann is a white Catholic who wore a Make America Great Again souvenir cap on a school field trip to the March for Life anti-abortion rally in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 18.

Sandmann’s lawyer, Lin Wood, added that more lawsuits would be filed against other news sources and even some entertainers in the coming weeks.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

Continue Reading

News

Kamala’s Did Disses His Own Daughter After She Pretends to Be “Cool”

Even Kamala’s kin can’t stand the candidate’s corny attempts at conjuring cool points.

Published

on

Kamala Harris

The democratic party has few options left to expand their voter base in 2020, after a disastrous and delinquent two years under the Trump administration.

Not only did the left lose the 2016 election after nominating one of the most flawed candidates in the history of the entire democratic party, but the still-raging tantrum that they’ve been throwing in the election’s wake has spawned a radical “resistance” that has already attempted to assassinate the entire GOP charity baseball team…among other things.

Now, in order to maintain the shreds of political relevancy that they have remaining, the democrats will be forced once again to seek out the youth vote for 2020.  The only problem is, they have yet to even find a candidate whose attempts at “being cool” won’t entirely backfire.

take our poll - story continues below

Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?

  • Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

As if Elizabeth Warren’s well-rehearsed “hey, I’m a regular person who drinks beer” stunt wasn’t transparent enough, Kamala Harris followed it up by claiming to have smoked weed while listening to Tupac and Snoop Dogg in college.  The only problem is that Harris was long gone from academia by the time either of those poetic gentlemen ever released a record.

That asinine PR stunt, aimed directly at the youth of America, has even Harris’ own father lambasting the 2020 hopeful that he calls “daughter”.

And it wasn’t just the chronological mishap that had the elder Harris fuming.

When Sen. Kamala Harris said last week that she obviously supports marijuana legalization and has smoked the plant, she cited her ethnicity — “Half my family’s from Jamaica. Are you kidding me?”

Her Jamaican father is not happy about that.

In a statement to Jamaica Global Online, Donald Harris called his daughter’s remarks a “travesty” and accused her of stereotyping.

Donald’s language was unmistakeable.

“My dear departed grandmother … as well as my deceased parents, must be turning in their grave right now to see their family’s name, reputation and proud Jamaican identity being connected, in any way, jokingly or not with the fraudulent stereotype of a pot-smoking joy seeker and in the pursuit of identity politics,” he said.

“Speaking for myself and my immediate Jamaican family, we wish to categorically dissociate ourselves from this travesty,” Mr. Harris, an economics professor at Stanford University, concluded in a statement to the news site for the Jamaican diaspora.

For the time being, the “coolest” candidate currently in the race for the 2020 democratic nomination is Bernie Sanders; a 77 year old white male from Vermont whose $700,000 vacation home lake house was purchased amid an investigation into his wife’s alleged abuse of funds from the university at which she works.

 

 

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend