Adult film star Stormy Daniels’ attorney Michael Avenatti has revealed the identity of the third accuser against Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who is claiming she was gang raped at a party in the 1980s where the SCOTUS nominee and his friend Mike Judge were both present.
In a sworn statement that was published on Twitter, Julie Swetnick, who is a former employee of the federal government, says that both Kavanaugh and Judge were frequent guests at house parties in the Washington, D.C. area in the early 1980s, stating they were “joined at the hip.”
Although she does not accuse Kavanaugh of sexual assault specifically, Swetnick calls Kavanaugh’s claims of being a virgin throughout high school and college a “lie” and says that Kavanaugh and others would “spike the punch” at parties with “Quaaludes” so that they could “gang rape” women in a side bedroom. She claims Kavanaugh and his friends would form a “train” and sexually assault women in groups.
Below is my correspondence to Mr. Davis of moments ago, together with a sworn declaration from my client. We demand an immediate FBI investigation into the allegations. Under no circumstances should Brett Kavanaugh be confirmed absent a full and complete investigation. pic.twitter.com/QHbHBbbfbE
— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) September 26, 2018
Here's the most explosive allegation from Avenatti's client, Julie Swetnick pic.twitter.com/6xoOkvu2eq
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) September 26, 2018
Swetnick says she became the victim of one of these so-called “gang rape trains” at a party where Kavanaugh and Judge were “present,” potentially implying that Kavanaugh and Judge ran a sophisticated gang-rape ring when the pair were only 15.
During his initial interviews on this topic, Avenatti claimed to be in possession of proof that Kavanaugh participated in these “gang rape trains,” but that doesn’t appear to be true.
Or he hasn’t produced the evidence yet. One or the other.
Again, the problem here is that people are making claims but have no way of backing up said allegations with any real, tangible proof. It’s all hearsay, a complicated case of “he said, she said.”
In our legal system, which is based on biblical principles, you need several different witnesses or lines of evidence in order to be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of a person’s guilt. No such evidence against Kavanaugh seems to exist.
Again, this all seems like another ploy to keep the confirmation vote delayed.
Source: Daily Wire
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.
ICE Releases Data Showing Liberal Hysteria is Wholly Unwarranted
Facts and logic tend to fly in the face of the liberal hysteria surrounding ICE's enforcement of immigration law.
After Venezuela Kerfuffle, Russia Eyes Military Base in Caribbean
Is our long dormant Cold War with Russia about to heat up once again?
Adam Schiff Shifts from Russian ‘Collusion’ to POTUS’ Pockets
The dog whistles coming from Camp Mueller have Adam Schiff's ears perking up.
Federal Judge Rules All of Obamacare UNCONSTITUTIONAL, Will Likely Head to SCOTUS
Trump Announces Name of New Chief of Staff, & Conservatives Will Be ECSTATIC
This is exactly the right man to fill General John Kelly's shoes. Agree?