News
Best of the Best Lawyers Indict A Russian Company That Doesn’t Exist?
It seems that Robert Mueller’s probe into allegations of Russian collusion during the 2016 election is falling apart at the seams.
It seems that Robert Mueller’s probe into allegations of Russian collusion during the 2016 election is falling apart at the seams. According to court transcripts, one of the Russian companies Mueller accused of funding a conspiracy to meddle in the election was revealed in court to not have existed during the time period alleged by his team of prosecutors, said a lawyer representing the defendant.
According to the Daily Wire:
U.S. Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey asked Eric Dubelier, one of two lawyers representing the accused Russian company, Concord Management and Consulting LLC, if he was representing a third company listed in Mueller’s indictment.
take our poll - story continues belowCompleting this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.Trending: HERE WE GO: Judge Orders Mueller to Hand Over Documents, & Things Get Interesting
“What about Concord Catering?” Harvey asked Dubelier. “The government makes an allegation that there’s some association. I don’t mean for you to – do you represent them, or not, today? And are we arraigning them as well?”
“We’re not,” Dubelier responded. “And the reason for that, Your Honor, is I think we’re dealing with a situation of the government having indicted the proverbial ham sandwich.”
“That company didn’t exist as a legal entity during the time period alleged by the government,” Dubelier explained. “If at some later time they show me that it did exist, we would probably represent them. But for purposes of today, no, we do not.”
The Judge brings up Concord Catering, saying the gov’t alleges an association with Concord Mgmt.
Attorney for Concord Mgmt:
The gov’t has “indicted the proverbial ham sandwich.”
“That company didn’t exist as a legal entity during the time period alleged by the gov’t.” pic.twitter.com/XiRG2OMa4M
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 12, 2018
Ryan Saavedra explains: “The term ‘indict a ham sandwich’ is believed to have originated from a 1985 report in the New York Daily News when New York Chief Judge Sol Wachtler told the news publication that government prosecutors have so much influence over grand juries that they could get them to ‘indict a ham sandwich.’”
It’s long past time for this witch-hunt to be shut down.
H/T Gateway Pundit
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.
Reminder in War on Christmas: Separation of Church and State is NOT in the U.S. Constitution
With the liberal war on Christmas now in full swing for the holiday season, it is a good time to...
Taylor Swift Invades Concertgoers’ Privacy with Big Brother Technology
This is downright terrifying.
Mystery Grand Jury Case Has ENTIRE 5th Floor of DC Courthouse Blockaded
This only serves to add an air of confusion as to what Mueller has actually been up to...if this is...
Chris Christie Tells POTUS, ‘Thanks, but NO THANKS’
With friends like these...Am I right?
Robert Mueller Did WHAT with Peter Strzok’s Cell Phone?!
Robert Mueller's tactics have been questionable, at the very least, but this is positively SHADY.
