Connect with us

News

Bill Kristol’s Poll Asks If People Respect Trump or Romney More, Learns That POTUS Is the Victor

Another one bites the dust…

John Salvatore

Published

on

Mitt Romney isn’t a bad guy. He’s just not a fighter.

That’s why he lost to Barack Obama in 2012. And that’s why he’s not coming to the end of his second term in the Oval Office.

Romney, once again, called out President Trump in another effort to prove that he’s a moderate Republican.

Trending: McAfee Dead in Prison After Repeatedly Declaring He Would Not Kill Himself

Former conservative Bill Kristol posed a question on Twitter…

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration? (1)

  • Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Let’s see how much of a hellscape Twitter is. Whom do you respect more?

Here’s the result:

Click on a name yourself, to see the latest results.

Reactions:

I eagerly supported Romney in ’12. Saw he was right about Russia, had successful business background I thought would work well as president. If any other GOP candidate had done what Trump is doing, he’d be a strong supporter. But he’s let his personal dislike of DJT kill that.

Romney is a good man but he is weak. He does not have the stamina to take what democrats constantly dish out. Romney surrenders into their madness. @POTUS takes them to task when he knows he is right, he stands up for it.

It’s 2019 and he still hasn’t figured out that @SenatorRomney has been rejected by the @GOP base.

Trump might be a crass loud mouth but at least he has a spine. Mitt on the other hand is civil but is a complete push over.

Another leftist “poll” by the fakest Republican to announce their political party affiliation. If Billy was ever a “Republican” then I’ve always been a Democrat.

Get a life, Billy. The only people against President Trump are those who can’t bear all this winning!

But I regress.

Just because liberals flock to you like flies to rotting food doesn’t mean they outnumber average working Americans.

If you’d come out of your elitist Trump-hating bubble, Bill, and look around you, maybe follow some real non-blue checked people, you’d get a clue. You have no idea what’s going on in the real world.

I see Kristol has finally found a way to get retweets: post polls in which he is abjectly humiliated.

I wouldn’t delight in your demise so much but you get crushed ONLY when you are trying to hurt someone else…so you totally deserve it.

Have you see the pic of Mitt begging Trump to be Secretary of State? He doesn’t even respect himself. 😂😂😂

Appears you have a continuous need for that overwhelming feeling of great disappointment.

How’s that twitter poll working out for you, Bill. This puts you into the same category as Rosie. You two make a great couple.

H/T: Twitchy

News

McAfee Dead in Prison After Repeatedly Declaring He Would Not Kill Himself

Social media users were quick to remind the world of McAfee’s own words.

Published

on

John McAfee is a computing legend, having pioneered the way in which systems and networks protect themselves from viruses, malware, spyware, and all the other assorted evils of this internet age. But now he lies dead, having allegedly committed suicide in a Spanish prison cell. Antivirus software tycoon John McAfee died by an apparent suicide in a Spanish jail cell Wednesday evening — hours after reports surfaced that he would be extradited to face federal charges in the US, according to local media. The eccentric tech entrepreneur was arrested in October and was awaiting extradition when he was found dead, police sources told the newspaper El Pais. The newspaper reported McAfee was pulled from his cell in Barcelona and police are investigating the circumstances around his death. Authorities aren’t shying away from calling it a suicide already. “Everything points to suicide,” the newspaper reported, citing justice department officials in the country. A second Spanish newspaper, El Mundo, also reported McAfee had died by an apparent suicide in the jail. But here is where it gets strange:  McAfee has been utterly insistent and consistent about the fact that he would never, ever take his own life, explicitly telling his followers on social media that, should he ever be found dead of suicide, he was killed. https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/1316801215083225096?s=20 https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/1200864283766251521?s=20 https://twitter.com/truthcrumbs/status/1407788935628079113?s=20 The investigation is ongoing at this time.

Continue Reading

News

Lab Finds Zero Fish DNA After Testing Subway’s Tuna Sandwich

You can “eat fresh” at Subway, but can you eat fish?

Published

on

For years we’ve told ourselves that there has to be a better way to do fast food.  Or, at the very least, a healthier way. And so new chains are constantly popping up, while the old staples adapt.  There are salads for sale as places like McDonald’s these days, which is something that kids who grew up in the 80’s might have had a hard time believing would ever occur. In the realm of healthy fast food, there is but one king:  The unbreakable Subway.  Not only did the brand survive having a pedophile as their spokesperson, but they currently operate more physical restaurants in the world than even the aforementioned burger purveyor. But an alarming new study has some wondering if, while they were “eating fresh” with a tuna sub, they were even eating fish. The New York Times published a report Sunday, which revealed that lab tests didn’t find “amplifiable tuna DNA” in Subway’s infamous tuna sandwich. NYT submitted “60 inches worth of Subway tuna sandwiches” from three separate Los Angeles locations for lab analysis in wake of the lawsuit filed earlier this year alleging the sandwich chain was serving customers “a mixture of various concoctions that do not constitute tuna.” The suit claims that independent lab tests showed the company meant to “imitate” tuna’s appearance by blending together these unknown ingredients. The study, commissioned by NYT, failed to not only identify tuna DNA, but the lab couldn’t even determine the origins of the fish in the provided sandwiches. “No amplifiable tuna DNA was present in the sample and so we obtained no amplification products from the DNA. Therefore, we cannot identify the species,” the results read. But it’s not all bad news: “There’s two conclusions. One, it’s so heavily processed that whatever we could pull out, we couldn’t make an…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week