Connect with us

News

Brown University Removes Article on Teen Gender Dysphoria…The Reason Why is Insane

Published

on

Our nation’s higher learning institutions are currently a battlefield for a mass battle between reason and ideology.

Ivy League schools like Brown have long been the gold standard for education, where future leaders, CEOs, groundbreaking scientists, and time-honored authors are forged.

Now, they have slowly eroded into hotbeds of far-left progressive thought, full of “safe spaces” and anti-Americanism, where single-sex organizations and any shred of patriotism are banned.

Trending: CNN Guest: We Must Censor More Conservative Outlets From Reaching ‘Huge Audiences’

Still, one Brown scholar had the good sense to research a stunning phenomenon that everyone should know about: “rapid-onset gender dysphoria.”

take our poll - story continues below

Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?

  • Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Academic researcher Lisa Littman noticed that many parents in online forums were reporting their children suddenly showing signs of gender dysphoria or identifying as transgender once a member of their peer group, particularly when every member of their peer group, themselves identified as transgender.

Here is the abstract for the paper she wrote about her findings:

In on-line forums, parents have been reporting that their children are experiencing what is described here as “rapid-onset gender dysphoria,” appearing for the first time during puberty or even after its completion. The onset of gender dysphoria seemed to occur in the context of belonging to a peer group where one, multiple, or even all of the friends have become gender dysphoric and transgender-identified during the same timeframe. Parents also report that their children exhibited an increase in social media/internet use prior to disclosure of a transgender identity. The purpose of this study was to document and explore these observations and describe the resulting presentation of gender dysphoria, which is inconsistent with existing research literature.

In reality, this is a sensible premise.

In 2018, this is cultural anathema.

The National Post reports on what happened next:

Littman’s study, years in careful gestation, is receiving plaudits from longtime experts in the field of gender dysphoria, but also blowback from transactivists. In a telephone interview, Littman said she was not surprised at this, as any research findings to do with public health can arouse passionate response and ruffle the feathers of those invested in their belief system. She found reviewing Reddit, SubReddit and Tumblr comments very troubling. Disparagement of heterosexuals and “cisgenders” is rife. Contempt for parents is encouraged. Feelings of victimhood are promoted. These echo chambers can be harmful, Littman says, “because teens are encouraged to cut themselves off from their nurturing support systems.”

Brown, who originally tweeted out a link to her article, quickly removed it from their websites at the pressure of transgender activists who clearly felt the same way as the folks Littman encountered online.

Twitter was quick to hit back on what is clearly a serious intellectual outrage: covering up the findings of a scientific study for the sake of not ruffling any feathers:

https://twitter.com/docamitay/status/1034195934576500736

Save conservative media!

*Headline

CNN Guest: We Must Censor More Conservative Outlets From Reaching ‘Huge Audiences’

How do they sleep at night??

John Salvatore

Published

on

“We have to turn down the capability of these Conservative influencers to reach these huge audiences.” This is how lefties think. Remember: the only right opinion is the left’s opinion. And that’s why America finds itself in such a dangerous place, these days. WATCH: https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1350911573347479553?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1350911573347479553%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.weaselzippers.us%2F462773-cnn-we-have-to-turn-down-the-ability-of-oan-and-fox-news-to-be-seen-by-people%2F https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1350864541333262340?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1350864541333262340%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2021%2F01%2Fformer-facebook-exec-calls-oann-newsmax-deplatformed-turn-capability-conservative-influencers-reach-huge-audiences-video%2F LOOK: https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736732364644353 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736735166451719 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736736915464193 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736738299596802 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736739813715968 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736742196084736 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736742196084736 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736742196084736 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736744767197184 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736744767197184 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736746423963650 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736747791290369 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736749691297795 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736751025123329 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736752421744642 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736753726218244 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736755097767938 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736755097767938 https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/1347736755097767938

Continue Reading

News

Adam Schiff: Under ‘No Circumstance’ Should Trump Receive Intel Briefings After January 20

But Schiff should??

John Salvatore

Published

on

Adam Schiff is no fan of Donald Trump – this much we’ve known for some time. His latest tirade against the current Commander in Chief, however, may have crossed a line. As chairman of the House Intel Committee, Schiff worked diligently in an attempt to have Trump impeached, with his secretive methods drawing major criticism from the Republican Party. Now, with President Trump less than 72 hours away from civilian life, Schiff is looking to send a parting shot across his bow. From Breitbart: House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” that there was “no circumstance” under which President Donald Trump should receive intelligence briefings once he leaves office. Schiff added, “I don’t think he can be trusted with it now, and in the future, he certainly can’t be trusted. Indeed, there were any number of intelligence partners of ours around the world who probably started withholding information from us because they didn’t trust the president would safeguard that information and protect the sources and methods. That makes us less safe. We’ve seen this president politicize intelligence, and that’s another risk to the country.” President Trump’s next moves aren’t exactly clear. Some seem to believe that Donald Trump will find his way into the media sphere, perhaps even launching his own news station. Others have suggested that he could announce his 2024 candidacy on the day of Biden’s inauguration, which would essentially “freeze out” other potential candidates.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week