Linkedin Share
Opinion

BUSTED: Republican Women's PAC That Attacks GOP Bankrolled By Liberal Billionaires

Linkedin Share

This is pretty interesting.

Two of three donors to Republican Women for Progress PAC are men, and it’s bankrolled by wealthy liberals.

The group routinely attacks the GOP, and now it makes sense why.

From Free Beacon:

A prominent ‘Republican’ women’s political action committee that regularly receives national media attention for its criticisms of President Donald Trump and the GOP is bankrolled by three liberal billionaire donors and activists, Federal Election Commission filings show.

Trending:
Massive Migrant Caravan Marches Toward US with LGBT Flags Flying as Mexican President Snubs Biden at Summit

Republican Women for Progress, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit, was founded by Jennifer Lim and Meghan Milloy, both former employees of Republican organizations. The duo also previously founded Republican Women for Hillary and spoke at the Democratic National Convention in the past.

Speaking of “Never Trump”…

Mitt Romney was recently elected to the United States Senate, replacing retiring Utah Republican Orrin Hatch.

At this moment, Romney should be halfway through his second term as president.

The 2012 race should’ve been a Romney victory, with Paul Ryan his VP.

Since 2016, neither Ryan nor Romney has been a big fan of President Trump.

Anyone who follows politics knows that.

Ryan is now saying that Romney could serve as the “standard bearer” for the Republican Party.

From Newsmax:

Related:
Lake Lanier Trends on Twitter After 'Haunted' Spot Claims Another Victim

House Speaker Paul Ryan said that newly elected senator Mitt Romney, his former running mate, can be the “standard-bearer” for Republicans in Congress like the late Sen. John McCain.

Ryan, R-Wis., said “it’s great” that Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts who was elected to the Senate in Utah, is coming to Capitol Hill.

It’s great that he’s coming. Mitt believes there’s a role for him … as a standard-bearer for our party.

After Trump said he’d look for a way to end birthright citizenship (possibly via executive order), Ryan wasn’t on board.

You obviously cannot do that. You cannot end birthright citizenship with an executive order. We didn’t like it when Obama tried changing immigration laws via executive action, and obviously as conservatives, we believe in the Constitution.

I’m a believer in following the plain text of the Constitution, and I think in this case, the 14th Amendment’s pretty clear, and that would involve a very very lengthy Constitutional process. I believe in interpreting the Constitution as its written, and that means you can’t do something like this via executive order.

Ryan is set to retire from Congress come January.

Check out Trump’s words for Paul:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1057674390446448642?%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1057674390446448642&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2018%2F10%2Ffireworks-president-trump-rips-into-speaker-paul-ryan-over-birthright-citizenship-comments%2F

Women from Mexico and many, many other nations come to America by any means necessary in order to give birth.

This give’s their children American citizenship by default.

What ends up happening is the American-born kids don’t get deported and often times neither do the mothers (or fathers).

It is a system of which plenty of Americans are not fond.

About that potential executive order to end birthright citizenship.

President Trump plans to sign an executive order that would remove the right to citizenship for babies of non-citizens and unauthorized immigrants born on U.S. soil, he said yesterday in an exclusive interview for “Axios on HBO,” a new four-part documentary news series debuting on HBO this Sunday at 6:30 p.m. ET/PT.

Why it matters: This would be the most dramatic move yet in Trump’s hard-line immigration campaign, this time targeting “anchor babies” and “chain migration.” And it will set off another standoff with the courts, as Trump’s power to do this through executive action is debatable, to say the least.

WATCH:

The problem with the EO is that Trump may run into trouble constitutionally.

Enter South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, who plans to introduce legislation to make the process easier:

Now more than ever it is absolutely vital the GOP retains both chambers of Congress in November’s midterm elections.

Submit a Correction →



Tags:
, , , , ,
Linkedin Share
About the Author:
John Salvatore has been a Writer and Editor of multiple political blogs since early 2015. He earned his Master’s degree in Public Administration upon completion of a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science. A diehard Los Angeles Dodgers fan, John can be reached at [email protected].




Conversation