Connect with us

News

California Governor Announces New Law Banning Fur Clothing Beginning In 2023 [Details]

They know what people want…

John Salvatore

Published

on

Most people might not have figured that California could become an even larger dumpster fire when Gavin Newsom took over as governor for Jerry Brown. But Gavin is proving them wrong. Things can get much worse in the Golden State – and have. They are banning and taxing at an extraordinary rate.

Not only has Cali cut off power to over one million residents to “prevent” wildfires (and at least person person has died because of it), but the liberal overlords of the state have decided to pay college athletes, demand colleges carry abortion drugs, and now they’re banning fur.

Is this what people were demanding? What about the illegal alien problem? Or the homeless population problem? The ridiculously high rent? The out-of-control gas prices? Shouldn’t those issues be addressed first? Let’s face it, people. California politicians honestly believe they know what you need better than you do.

Trending: McAfee Dead in Prison After Repeatedly Declaring He Would Not Kill Himself

Don’t fight it. Just move. Go to Arizona or Texas. Then and only then, will California will change.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration? (1)

  • Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

California is officially the first state in the nation to ban the sale of new fur clothing.

From San Francisco Chronicle:

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed AB44 on Saturday, outlawing the sale and manufacture of new fur clothing and accessories. The ban doesn’t take effect until Jan. 1, 2023, giving retailers time to sell off their inventories.

[…]

Supporters say the bill is necessary to end an inhumane fur trade that raises animals in filthy conditions and slaughters them solely for their coats, often using methods such as electrocution.

Reactions:

It’s also officially the first state to be okay with people using the street as a bathroom. Good job.

When do you plan to ban homelessness and ridiculously high (unaffordable) rents?

The people dying on your streets and sick in hospitals with 3rd world diseases that were thought eradicated from America thank you for you attention to… (check notes)…. fur coats

Seriously how is this helping with our homeless, high electric/fuel costs, and healthcare

While this is good it would be great if you could do something about the homeless dopefiends doing daily property crimes all over the state.

I mean cool, I guess, but are they banning the sale of meat too? Because they kinda go hand in hand

That’s great and all, but can you do something about the cost of living and housing prices?!

Why is this a priority with everything else going on?

It’s also the first state to bring back the plague in mass amounts. But way to go on the fashion policing.

Cut off the electricity and ban fur coats. Brilliant. Here 🧠you might need that.

I’m sure everyone without power was worried about f’n fur clothing

Don’t forget we also have the largest homeless population.

H/T: Twitchy

News

McAfee Dead in Prison After Repeatedly Declaring He Would Not Kill Himself

Social media users were quick to remind the world of McAfee’s own words.

Published

on

John McAfee is a computing legend, having pioneered the way in which systems and networks protect themselves from viruses, malware, spyware, and all the other assorted evils of this internet age. But now he lies dead, having allegedly committed suicide in a Spanish prison cell. Antivirus software tycoon John McAfee died by an apparent suicide in a Spanish jail cell Wednesday evening — hours after reports surfaced that he would be extradited to face federal charges in the US, according to local media. The eccentric tech entrepreneur was arrested in October and was awaiting extradition when he was found dead, police sources told the newspaper El Pais. The newspaper reported McAfee was pulled from his cell in Barcelona and police are investigating the circumstances around his death. Authorities aren’t shying away from calling it a suicide already. “Everything points to suicide,” the newspaper reported, citing justice department officials in the country. A second Spanish newspaper, El Mundo, also reported McAfee had died by an apparent suicide in the jail. But here is where it gets strange:  McAfee has been utterly insistent and consistent about the fact that he would never, ever take his own life, explicitly telling his followers on social media that, should he ever be found dead of suicide, he was killed. https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/1316801215083225096?s=20 https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/1200864283766251521?s=20 https://twitter.com/truthcrumbs/status/1407788935628079113?s=20 The investigation is ongoing at this time.

Continue Reading

News

Lab Finds Zero Fish DNA After Testing Subway’s Tuna Sandwich

You can “eat fresh” at Subway, but can you eat fish?

Published

on

For years we’ve told ourselves that there has to be a better way to do fast food.  Or, at the very least, a healthier way. And so new chains are constantly popping up, while the old staples adapt.  There are salads for sale as places like McDonald’s these days, which is something that kids who grew up in the 80’s might have had a hard time believing would ever occur. In the realm of healthy fast food, there is but one king:  The unbreakable Subway.  Not only did the brand survive having a pedophile as their spokesperson, but they currently operate more physical restaurants in the world than even the aforementioned burger purveyor. But an alarming new study has some wondering if, while they were “eating fresh” with a tuna sub, they were even eating fish. The New York Times published a report Sunday, which revealed that lab tests didn’t find “amplifiable tuna DNA” in Subway’s infamous tuna sandwich. NYT submitted “60 inches worth of Subway tuna sandwiches” from three separate Los Angeles locations for lab analysis in wake of the lawsuit filed earlier this year alleging the sandwich chain was serving customers “a mixture of various concoctions that do not constitute tuna.” The suit claims that independent lab tests showed the company meant to “imitate” tuna’s appearance by blending together these unknown ingredients. The study, commissioned by NYT, failed to not only identify tuna DNA, but the lab couldn’t even determine the origins of the fish in the provided sandwiches. “No amplifiable tuna DNA was present in the sample and so we obtained no amplification products from the DNA. Therefore, we cannot identify the species,” the results read. But it’s not all bad news: “There’s two conclusions. One, it’s so heavily processed that whatever we could pull out, we couldn’t make an…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week