Connect with us

News

Chelsea Clinton Tries to Slam Trump on Migrant Children, Blasts Obama Instead

Well that didn’t go as planned.

Published

on

Hillary Clinton’s former spokesman, Jesse Lehrich, caused quite a commotion after posting a Washington Post article on Twitter titled, “Trump administration preparing to hold immigrant children on military bases,” adding to that a spot of commentary stating the “Trump admin is preparing to put migrant children in warehouses…”

Here’s the tweet in question:

Trending: Biden Looks Straight Into Camera, Says America Is ‘Morally Deprived’ — Watch

take our poll - story continues below

Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?

  • Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

As you probably already guessed, this whole thing has been blown out of proportion by the mainstream media who are hungry for another scandal of some sort to try hanging the Trump administration out to dry.

Unfortunately for them, this isn’t it.

The HHS never mentioned warehouses on military bases. They are looking into sites, including military bases, where they can house migrant children in the future, if necessary. Big difference.

The fake outrage machine immediately started churning with blue checks all over Twitter blubbering all over themselves about this non-story.

https://twitter.com/KenPlume/status/996519847398969345

Chelsea Clinton even got in on the action.

“Cruelty beyond any decent comprehension.”

This tweet was meant to be a takedown of Trump, but in reality, it’s a punch to the proverbial jaw of former President Barack Obama because children being housed on military bases happened during his administration:

The use of military bases to hold immigrant children is not without precedent. At the peak of the 2014 child-immigration crisis, the Obama administration used bases in Oklahoma, Texas and California to house more than 7,000 children over a period of several months.

In other words, Obama does it and no one bats an eye. President Trump does it and suddenly he’s the equivalent of Marvel villain Thanos. This is a glaring inconsistency. Or maybe it would be better termed hypocrisy?

Source: Twitchy

*Headline

Dem Senator: Troops Remain In DC Because Trump May Incite Another Capitol Attack

Bush league.

John Salvatore

Published

on

On a scale of 1-10, this quote from a Democrat Senator hits 11 on the side of stupidity. People like Chris Murphy just can’t help themselves. They are literally obsessed with President Donald Trump. Hey, Connecticut – want a do-over on this guy or what? If you live in the Constitution State and said no, you may want to re-evaluate. During an appearance on CNN, Murphy said: “The threat to the country is not over. We still have 5,000 National Guard members surrounding the Capitol complex. Why? Because there are still existing threats, present threats to the security of the Capitol. And so long as Donald Trump is empowered by Senate Republicans, there’s still the chance that he is going to incite another attempt at the Capitol or stir up similar trouble at the state legislative level or in a governor’s election when things don’t go his way. The threat is still very real to American democracy.” From The Daily Wire: Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (CA) added to the already deep divide in our nation during a online meeting with constituents in San Francisco on Saturday, claiming the Trump supporters who breached the Capitol on Wednesday chose their “whiteness over democracy.” Pelosi said, “When that assault was taking place on the Capitol, 3,865 people in our country died of the coronavirus, many of them people of color because of the injustice of it all. The next day, on Thursday, 4,000 people died of the coronavirus. Why? Because decisions were made at the highest level, months before in the Oval Office, of denial, distortion, delay, calling it a ‘hoax.’” She added, “I thought it was going to be an epiphany for those who were in opposition of our democracy to see the light. Instead, it was an epiphany for the…

Continue Reading

News

Report: Biden Forming Committee With Intent of Packing the Supreme Court

Uh oh.

John Salvatore

Published

on

Biden refused to answer on the campaign trail if he would pack the court. He even said the American people don’t deserve to know his position on the matter. But since SCOTUS currently leans 5-4 conservative (though, four of the five justices sometimes side with the liberal minority), Joe is now making it clear that he’s planning to bump up the total from nine. From Politico: The Biden administration is moving forward with the creation of a bipartisan commission to study reforms to the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary. The commission will be housed under the purview of the White House Counsel’s office and filled out with the behind-the-scenes help of the Biden campaign’s lawyer Bob Bauer, who will co-chair the commission. Its specific mandate is still being decided. But, in a signal that the commission is indeed moving ahead, some members have already been selected, according to multiple people familiar with the discussions. CONTINUED: Among those who will be on the commission are Cristina Rodríguez, a professor at Yale Law School and a former deputy assistant attorney general in the Obama Department of Justice, who will join Bauer as co-chair. Caroline Fredrickson, the former president of the American Constitution Society, and Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor and a former assistant attorney general in the Bush Department of Justice, will also serve on the commission, those familiar with discussions said. Fredrickson has hinted that she is intellectually supportive of ideas like court expansion. In 2019, she said in an interview with Eric Lesh, the executive director of the LGBT Bar Association and Foundation of Greater New York: “I often point out to people who aren’t lawyers that the Supreme Court is not defined as ‘nine person body’ in the Constitution, and it has changed size many times.”…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week