Connect with us

News

Chelsea Clinton Wants Tucker Carlson Banned From Facebook (and She’s Making Up What He Said)

Continuing her tradition of saying stupid things, Chelsea wants Tucker Carlson banned from Facebook because of something he didn’t say.

Published

on

Perhaps Chelsea Clinton does it just to get attention, and I feel bad for her in a way. After all, her mother never cared about anything more than becoming president, and her ex-President father wants to sleep with almost every woman within arm’s reach. It’s no surprise that he appointed Andrew Cuomo to his cabinet during his administration. On the other hand, one would think by now, a supposedly bright woman like Chelsea Clinton should realize that every time she says something stupid, she will be attacked by the part of America that doesn’t worship the Clinton name. Perhaps she isn’t really bright. Maybe her intelligence is just another fake story by the mainstream media. Her latest unAmerican act of stupidity is calling for Facebook to ban Tucker Carlson because of what she thinks he said about COVID Vaccines. Chelsea wants Tucker Carlson banned

Chelsea Clinton regularly publicly supports the Facebook page of her father, Bubba Clinton, even though he has been accused of sexual harassment and rape by at least 15 women. But she wants the social media giant to ban the wildly popular Fox News host, Tucker Carlson, because she’s a vaccine advocate or something, and she falsely thinks Tucker was spreading disinformation about the vaccine.

Hey Chelsea, based on Bubba’s history, I shudder to think what he may be spreading (STD?).

Here’s what happened…

take our poll - story continues below

Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?

  • Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

During a Tuesday evening segment, Tucker Carlson spoke about the confusion “medical experts” have spread mixed messages about COVID from the very onset of the pandemic continuing through today.

Unfortunately, the only video that I could find of Tucker’s Tuesday monologue does not have the remarks that Chelsea Clinton found objectionable, but you’ll get the context.

Watch:

It was just after this that Carlson said The Thing That Must Not Be Said, “If the vaccine is effective, there is no reason for people who have received the vaccine to wear masks or avoid physical contact. So maybe it doesn’t work, and they’re simply not telling you that.”

Well, all hell broke loose.

The media’s medical saint, who leads the charge in providing conflicting information about COVID, claimed on Wednesday morning calling Carlson’s statement a “crazy conspiracy theory.”

He still didn’t answer the question that Carlson and many other Americans ask if the vaccine works why do we have to wear the masks. Tucker wasn’t saying the vaccines don’t work. He was saying that based on what Fauci and others like him are saying, they don’t believe it works. If they believed in the vaccine worked, they would tell vaccinated people not to wear their masks anymore (except for people like Nancy Pelosi. Her frightening face is better off covered).

In typical CNN fashion, CNN took the statement out of any sort of context, ran with it, and Chelsea took it from them.

Tucker Carlson asked why fully vaccinated people need to continue to follow all of the same COVID public health measures as those who have not been vaccinated.

Is it not a reasonable question? Vaccines are given to prevent you from contracting an illness. We are told that at least two of the vaccines in use in the United States are over 90% effective, so why can’t vaccinated people return to normal life and take off the damned masks? Even if you wait two weeks or so for full efficacy, medical “experts” like Fauci are still advocating for masking, distancing, and hand-washing. Heck, Dr. Fauci still wears a mask! Why? He’s fully vaccinated.

But asking questions from our health officials who are driving vaccine skepticism is not permitted-–it’s deplorable.

Chelsea Clinton is calling on Facebook to ban Fox News host Tucker Carlson from the platform following a surge in online engagement with a post that included the conservative television personality’s speculation on the effectiveness of coronavirus vaccines…

…According to data from the social media tool CrowdTangle, Carlson’s segment had become the most popular post on Facebook by Wednesday.

In response, Clinton tweeted, “In December, @facebook banned claims about #covid19 vaccines ‘that have been debunked by public health experts.’”

Clinton added that the attention to Carlson’s segment was “especially troubling given Republican men are currently most likely to say they’re not interested in being vaccinated.”
Source: The Hill

Here’s Bubba Clinton’s daughter’s tweet calling for Carlson’s censorship for saying that the “medical experts” are the ones undermining their own credibility.

On Wednesday night, Tucker explained that he wasn’t pushing “disinformation.” He was asking questions rooted in science. He says that the only reason that he’s asking the questions is that “the people in charge are acting like it doesn’t work.”

All Tucker Carlson wants are honest answers, but leftists who want you vaccinated but refuse to give you freedom afterward want him taken down, but not the authoritarian “medical expert” narcissists who are enjoying the limelight a little too much and are sending mixed messages to the American public.

But people like Fauci keep changing their position without explanation. The media’s favorite doctor seemed to have been wrong or changed his mind about every major recommendation he’s made. Remember it was Fauci who recommended we close down the country for 15 days to stop the spread–13 months ago. Fauci urged us not to wear masks, then begged us to wear masks (then two masks). He said it would be years before a vaccine for COVID was developed, then took credit for President Trump’s warp speed which delivered three vaccines in less than a year. Fauci slammed Florida Governor Ron DeSantis last April when he announced he wanted to get schools open as soon as possible. Still, in December, he changed his answer, saying the default position should be to keep the children in school or to get them back to school.” He even called Trump’s response to the pandemic impressive before he beat up Trump’s response.

The TV stars in the medical community lost the respect of much of America months ago. As for Chelsea, she never had their respect.

Parts of this post were first seen at Clash Daily.

News

Donald Trump Gets Bad News from SCOTUS Regarding January 6th

The Democrats just gained a whole lot of 2022 and 2024 ammunition.

Published

on

In their pursuit of political points, the January 6th committee has exuded a nonstop barrage of actions taken at the expense of former President Donald Trump, generally believed to be in the interest of stymying his plans for the 2024 presidential election.

Their attacks have fairly transparent of late, subpoenaing anyone and everyone who had contact with the former President in and around the date in question, and even some who had nothing to do with the attack on the Capitol at all.

This week, the group scored a rather major win in the Supreme Court, which will allow them access to a trove of documents from the Trump White House.

The U.S. Supreme Court has delivered a blow to former President Donald Trump, rejecting his request to block release of White House records being sought by the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

take our poll - story continues below

Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?

  • Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The court’s order paves the way for the release of records from the National Archives. The records could shed light on the events that led to the riot by Trump supporters protesting the results of the 2020 presidential election, which was won by Democrat Joe Biden.

In its decision Wednesday, the Supreme Court noted that the question of whether a former president can claim executive privilege need not be answered in this case, because a lower court had already decided.

And they didn’t beat around the bush.

“Because the Court of Appeals concluded that President Trump’s claims would have failed even if he were the incumbent, his status as a former President necessarily made no difference to the court’s decision,” the court said in its order.

There is little doubt that this access will only cause the scope of the already-controversial investigation to widen, and allow the Democrats a plethora of new angles from which to launch their politically-focused onslaught.

In their pursuit of political points, the January 6th committee has exuded a nonstop barrage of actions taken at the expense of former President Donald Trump, generally believed to be in the interest of stymying his plans for the 2024 presidential election. Their attacks have fairly transparent of late, subpoenaing anyone and everyone who had contact with the former President in and around the date in question, and even some who had nothing to do with the attack on the Capitol at all. This week, the group scored a rather major win in the Supreme Court, which will allow them access to a trove of documents from the Trump White House. The U.S. Supreme Court has delivered a blow to former President Donald Trump, rejecting his request to block release of White House records being sought by the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. The court’s order paves the way for the release of records from the National Archives. The records could shed light on the events that led to the riot by Trump supporters protesting the results of the 2020 presidential election, which was won by Democrat Joe Biden. In its decision Wednesday, the Supreme Court noted that the question of whether a former president can claim executive privilege need not be answered in this case, because a lower court had already decided. And they didn’t beat around the bush. “Because the Court of Appeals concluded that President Trump’s claims would have failed even if he were the incumbent, his status as a former President necessarily made no difference to the court’s decision,” the court said in its order. There is little doubt that this access will only cause the scope of the already-controversial investigation to widen, and allow the Democrats a plethora…

Continue Reading

News

PUTIN POKES THE BEAR: Russian Troops Move Toward Ukraine as World Warns

There may be no peaceful end to this situation.

Published

on

While it has long been understood that Vladimir Putin is a figure representing chaos on the world’s stage, (whether covertly or proudly), the sort of trouble that he’s stirring up this week won’t likely have a peaceful end.

Putin appears hellbent on finding a way and a reason to take Ukraine back under Russian control.  The tiny nation, rich in natural gas and other resources, is far too minuscule to put up a fight, and so it will be up to the rest of the world to deter the Kremlin.

And despite a number of unmistakable warnings, Putin appears unfazed.

Russia is a sending an unspecified number of troops from the country’s far east to Belarus for major war games, officials said Tuesday, a deployment that will further beef up Russian military presence near Ukraine amid Western fears of a planned invasion.

take our poll - story continues below

Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?

  • Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Amid the soaring tensions, the White House warned that Russia could attack its neighbor at “any point,” while the U.K. delivered a batch of anti-tank weapons to Ukraine.

Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister Alexander Fomin said the joint drills with Belarus would involve practicing a joint response to external threats.

Ukrainian officials have warned that Russia could launch an attack on Ukraine from several directions, including from its ally Belarus.

As for any attempts to stop the Russian invasion?  They were squashed when a well-known Putin mouthpiece announced on television that any push to keep Putin from getting what he wants could end in the opposition being turned into “radioactive dust”.

 

While it has long been understood that Vladimir Putin is a figure representing chaos on the world’s stage, (whether covertly or proudly), the sort of trouble that he’s stirring up this week won’t likely have a peaceful end. Putin appears hellbent on finding a way and a reason to take Ukraine back under Russian control.  The tiny nation, rich in natural gas and other resources, is far too minuscule to put up a fight, and so it will be up to the rest of the world to deter the Kremlin. And despite a number of unmistakable warnings, Putin appears unfazed. Russia is a sending an unspecified number of troops from the country’s far east to Belarus for major war games, officials said Tuesday, a deployment that will further beef up Russian military presence near Ukraine amid Western fears of a planned invasion. Amid the soaring tensions, the White House warned that Russia could attack its neighbor at “any point,” while the U.K. delivered a batch of anti-tank weapons to Ukraine. Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister Alexander Fomin said the joint drills with Belarus would involve practicing a joint response to external threats. Ukrainian officials have warned that Russia could launch an attack on Ukraine from several directions, including from its ally Belarus. As for any attempts to stop the Russian invasion?  They were squashed when a well-known Putin mouthpiece announced on television that any push to keep Putin from getting what he wants could end in the opposition being turned into “radioactive dust”.  

Continue Reading
The Schaftlein Report

Latest Articles

Best of the Week