News
Claire McCaskill is Voting Against Kavanaugh. Her Reason Why is Surprising.

Democrat Claire McCaskill, who is a Democrat, has decided she’s not going to be voting in favor of Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court. Shocker, right?
McCaskill said her decision not to support Kavanaugh wouldn’t be based on the paper thin allegations of sexual assault against him, but rather, on an entirely different issue.
Free speech. She disagrees with him because he supports free speech.
Trending: REPORT: Smollett Tells ‘Empire’ Castmates ‘I Swear to God, I Did Not Do This’
The left has lost their minds.
“He has revealed his bias against limits on campaign donations which places him completely out of the mainstream of this nation,” McCaskill wrote in a statement posted to Twitter. “He wrote, ‘And I have heard very few people say that limits on contributions to candidates are unconstitutional although I for one tend to think those limits have some constitutional problems.’”
She also suggested that Kavanaugh would “give free reign [sic] to anonymous donors and foreign governments through their citizens to spend money to interfere and influence our elections with so-called ‘issue ads.’” She later tied him to Russia, stating that a Russian company “indicted for election interference is currently using Judge Kavanaugh’s opinion to argue for their innocence.”
McCaskill further said she was “uncomfortable about his view on Presidential power as it relates to the rule of law, and his position that corporations are people” but that his support of “unlimited donations and dark anonymous money, from even foreign interests” was the “determining factor” in her decision to vote against him.
McCaskill is alluding to the Citizens United Supreme Court case, which determined that political campaign spending was protected by the First Amendment. The Left disagrees with this, and continuously rails against the decision, even while accepting so-called dark money allowed by it.
The whole idea of limitations on campaign finance is ridiculous to begin with. The government has no right to tell someone what they can and cannot do with the money they work hard to earn. It’s their personal property, which means they can do whatever they want with it.
The fact that an elected official, who is supposed to be upholding the Constitution, would support such limits placed on free speech is extremely troubling. Perhaps this is why she’s struggling in her re-election campaign?
Just a theory.
Source: Daily Wire
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.
News
Woman Rips MAGA Hat From Man’s Head, Then Claims SHE Is the Victim [Details]
How in the world does she figure?

If a person snatches the MAGA hat from your head, who is at fault? That should be rhetorical.
According to a woman who did just that, she is the victim.
It’s getting to the point where you really can’t even make this stuff up anymore.
From Yahoo:
A woman who ripped off a man’s “Make America Great Again” hat at a Mexican restaurant says she wanted retribution for years of discrimination.
On Feb. 15th, Bryton Turner was eating at Casa Vallarta Mexican Restaurant in Falmouth, Mass., when a Brazilian woman, not being named by police, snatched off his red MAGA hat.
“Went out with some friends trying to enjoy some dinner and drinks when this ignoramus randomly tried to hit my hat off and started yelling at me…” Turner wrote on Facebook, sharing two videos. “I wasn’t going to press charges but in front of four cops she did it again so now she’s going to jail.”
[…]
Yahoo Lifestyle couldn’t reach the woman for comment. “I had a little bit to drink maybe that’s the reason that I couldn’t walk away but being discriminated for so many times in my life, I just had to stand up for myself,” she told Boston 25 News. “He’s not a victim. I am the victim. I have been bullied, OK?”
Check out the video posted by Bryton Turner, showing the woman snatching his hat…
Posted by Bryton Turner on Friday, 15 February 2019
Despite taking the time to fly to the Middle East to spend Christmas with the troops, President Trump and First Lady Melania were mocked by CNN and the like.
Go figure, right?
Melania wore the wrong boots.
Donald, well, was Donald. That’s always enough to set the MSM off in and of itself.
The worst part is that CNN blasted 45 for signing MAGA hats for the troops despite there being no rule against it.
Troops bringing President Trump "Make America Great Again" hats to sign may have violated a military rule https://t.co/AfKkrYq7PV pic.twitter.com/gnRoQge82S
— CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) December 27, 2018
What’s worse is that Obama signed Obama-type stuff for the troops back in the day, and the mainstream media was dead silent.
There’s a word for that.
It’s called hypocrisy.
From Daily Wire:
As noted by Joe Concha at The Hill, “The worst kind of bias is the bias of omission. And what’s missing from this report is precedent as it pertains to President Obama who, as a candidate, signed memorabilia for U.S. service members overseas in July 2008. Not a hint of criticism followed.”
SFGate reported on the Obama trip to Afghanistan at the time, though they never highlighted the signing of memorabilia by Mr. Obama.
Did “journalists” breathlessly hunt down the names of these service members who had Barack and Michelle and Obama sign campaign memorabilia in 2008? pic.twitter.com/72qbxNsddC
— J. Kenneth Blackwell (@kenblackwell) December 27, 2018
Michelle did it, too:
CNN owes Trump a big apology.
News
Ocasio-Cortez Trolled for the Second Time After NEW Billboard Goes Up In NYC
And boom goes the dynamite!

Self-described Democrat Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez fought hard to make sure Amazon would not build a new headquarters in New York.
She celebrated after the company decided to pull out.
A couple of days ago, a billboard went up in Times Square lambasting the freshman lawmaker for her actions.
LOOK:
Check out the sign in Times Sq.! Thanks to @JobCreatorsUSA! pic.twitter.com/iIN0DTo8r2
— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) February 20, 2019
AOC saw the billboard.
She figured she had to respond.
She sent a tweet calling the sign “wack”:
Few things effectively communicate the power we’ve built in fighting dark money & anti-worker policies like billionaire-funded groups blowing tons of cash on wack billboards (this one is funded by the Mercers).
(PS fact that it’s in Times Sq tells you this isn’t for/by NYers.) https://t.co/B4QTPi1r2k
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) February 21, 2019
The people behind the billboard saw AOC’s response.
They decided to go after her one more time…
Check this out, per Daily Wire:
Job Creators Network put up a second billboard that stated: “Hey AOC, Saw your wack tweet.”
LOOK:
Conservative group claps back at AOC with new Times Square billboard https://t.co/qjOBuwOz0z pic.twitter.com/l87g6oGgIo
— New York Post (@nypost) February 22, 2019
The criticism of Ocasio-Cortez “comes after Ocasio-Cortez vigorously defended her role in sinking Amazon’s move to New York City on Tuesday in the face of bipartisan criticism,” Fox News reported. “The freshman Democratic New York congresswoman has faced days of criticism from normally friendly media voices and fellow Democrats over her role in Amazon’s decision to pull back from building a $2.5 billion campus in the Long Island City neighborhood of Queens.”
New York City Democrat Mayor Bill de Blasio had to correct Ocasio-Cortez for incorrectly thinking that “the $3 billion in tax breaks that were going to go to Amazon still existed after Amazon pulled out of NYC,” The Daily Wire reported.
And boom goes the dynamite!
Ocasio-Cortez believes she was born “privileged.”
Because she was born in the USA? Because she was born into wealth?
Nope. It’s ecause she was born straight.
WATCH:
.@AOC: I acknowledge my "privilege" in being born "cisgendered"
"I'm a cisgendered woman, I will never know the trauma of feeling like I'm not born in the right body. That is a privilege I have no matter how poor my family was when I was born." pic.twitter.com/QkviNMtLmv
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) January 30, 2019
While attacking former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, who may run as an Independent for president in 2020, AOC wound up with egg all over her face.
See her tweet:
Why don’t people ever tell billionaires who want to run for President that they need to “work their way up” or that “maybe they should start with city council first”? https://t.co/3d8Nenrvl5
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) January 30, 2019
Pretty rude, right?
The problem is that Ocasio-Cortez clearly has no clue about Howard’s background.
-Schultz was born on July 19, 1953, in Brooklyn, New York. In an interview with Bloomberg, he said growing up in the projects — “loosely described as the other side of the tracks”
-He experienced poverty at an early age. When Schultz was 7 years old, his father broke his ankle while working as a truck driver picking up and delivering diapers. At the time, his father had no health insurance or worker’s compensation, and the family was left with no income.
Reactions:
Because running a massive company that employs hundreds of thousands of people is more of a record than pouring drinks for people. https://t.co/qOOU5x4BMs
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) January 30, 2019
Schultz grew up in the projects, was the first of his family to go to college, and turned a tiny coffeeshop into a multi-billion dollar company. How much more should he “work his way up?” https://t.co/JfqAfwxgXK
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) January 30, 2019
Seems like an odd criticism from someone whose first elective office is the US Congress. https://t.co/DfaFZAMcx5
— Jeryl Bier (@JerylBier) January 30, 2019
Building a $83 billion global company from basically nothing is … something? https://t.co/s4VmeBNt86
— Steve Goldstein (@MKTWgoldstein) January 30, 2019
He lived in a housing project. https://t.co/LTsdM0fO4D
— Alyssa E. Hackbarth (@AlyssaEinDC) January 30, 2019
Schultz isn’t exactly a conservative, but he has been ripping AOC and Senator Elizabeth Warren like he’s getting paid to do it.
Ex-Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz on Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) saying billionaires are "policy failures" and America is "immoral" for allowing them: "It's so un-American to think that way. I'm self-made…I came from the projects…I'm living proof of the American dream" pic.twitter.com/vIsh5fpCLb
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) January 30, 2019
This is how some Dems reacted after learning Schultz might run in 2020:
-
News5 days ago
CONFIRMED: Nigerian Brothers Admit Smollett Paid Them to Stage ‘Hate Crime’ [Details]
-
News5 days ago
BOMBSHELL: Dem Ilhan Omar Represents ‘Terrorist Recruitment Capital’ of U.S. [Report]
-
News5 days ago
Obama’s Border Patrol Chief Says Trump Isn’t Making Up Border Emergency
-
News3 days ago
NEVER FORGET: Bernie Was Asked to Leave Hippie Commune for Refusing to Work
-
News4 days ago
Rosenstein Leaving DOJ — Allegedly Offered To Wear Wire Near Trump
-
News3 days ago
Nikki Haley Unloads Both Barrels On Smollett, Then Lights Up MSM for Getting Played
-
News2 days ago
REPORT: AOC’s Chief of Staff Was Hired After Funneling Money Through Her Boyfriend
-
News6 days ago
What Bias? CNN Political Reporter Helps Kamala Harris Try On Clothes [WATCH]
-
News5 days ago
Obama Declared 12 ‘National Emergencies,’ Yet Media Did Not Mind At All
-
News3 days ago
WATCH: Voters Send Bernie Message He Won’t Forget HOURS After Making 2020 Bid
-
News5 days ago
IT BEGINS: Hollywood Star Blames Trump, Pence for Smollett ‘Hate Crime’ Hoax [Watch]
-
News4 days ago
VIDEO: Kamala Speechless When Confronted About Smollett Hoax, Called It A ‘Lynching’