Connect with us

Politics

CNN Marks Father’s Day By Celebrating a Father Who’s Really a Mother…Because Of Course

But to the folks over at CNN and the gender theory apologists who influence them, their power lies in the way they use language.

Published

on

So Father’s Day is around the corner, and what better way to celebrate than to insist that fathers can be mothers too.

This is the far reaches to which gender theory has stretched, but the crazy thing about this is, that in the left’s undying effort to virtue signal and worship at the feet of political correctness, they are normalizing and affirming not only incredibly radical, far-left philosophy, but they’re establishing an Orwellian standard for the deceptive language they use to legitimize this philosophy.

It truly is a brave new world, to mix my 20th Century dystopian novel references.

Trending: What Does Bill Gates Plan to Do After He Vaccinates the World Population?

The piece on CNN’s website is called “He gave birth. He breastfed. Now, he wants his son to see him as a man,” and yes, the whole thing is about as insufferable as the title would suggest.

take our poll - story continues below

Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?

  • Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

It is about a…let’s just go with “woman” for the sake of the reader being able to follow what on earth I’m about to explain to you, named Sabastion Sparks, 24, “a transgender man who lives with his wife Angel in suburban Atlanta.”

Angel, you see, is a man, and their 20-month-old son was conceived naturally by the couple as they took a break from their respective hormone treatments to have a child. Once the son was born, they continued to “transition” and are now raising the son together.

Only mommy is daddy and daddy is mommy.

Not according to CNN, of course. No, you see, according to CNN, Sparks is a man who gave birth to a child and is now a father.

“Like many new dads, Sabastion Sparks knew parenting would come with serious challenges. But most new dads didn’t give birth to their child. They didn’t breastfeed them,” they write.

This is, and you’ll forgive me for stating the painfully obvious, factually incorrect. Literally no dads have ever given birth and breastfed their child. Because that’s what women do. And it’s sort of the whole being-able-to-carry-and-nurse-a-child thing that makes a woman a woman.

Also, with the kindest, most compassionate thoughts extended to Sparks for the struggles she has no doubt experienced and continues to experience in her life…she is not a dad. 

She’s a mother.

But to the folks over at CNN and the gender theory apologists who influence them, their power lies in the way they use language. By calling Sparks a “dad” and also noting that her “wife,” Angel, was “was designated male at birth” they’re using a well-established style of Newspeak to positively insist that these things are true when they are not.

If someone wants to live their life appearing as, with the aid of hormone treatment and surgery, the opposite sex, that’s one thing, but we cross over into dangerous territory by using blatant falsehoods just to validate their lifestyle, which is why this trend is so very troubling.

This is to say nothing of the little boy who will be raised by adults who, we are guessing, are also using this deliberately false information. Not to mention have turned the conventional family and the most fundamental aspects of what makes us human on its head.

But hey. At least these two parents are married and raising their kid together, right?

H/T The Daily Wire 

 

News

Apple Backs Down, Will Allow Parler Back on App Store

The news is seen as a major boost for the First Amendment.

Published

on

Free speech is a fickle thing, and precious too.  If we’re not careful, it can be stripped away but those who hide behind the claim that a “private” company can limit your personal freedoms. Twitter, Facebook, and other social media platforms are almost always the culprits here, bending the algorithmic reach of those with whom they disagree. Enter Parler:  A free speech app where only the bare legal minimum of content would be moderated. The platform became incredibly popular with an astonishing swiftness, but soon faced trouble from companies who had previously aligned themselves with Facebook and Twitter’s more controlling stance. Apple, who had previously booted Parler from its App Store, has now relented to the Constitution. Apple has approved Parler’s return to the iOS app store following improvements the social media company made to better detect and moderate hate speech and incitement, according to a letter the iPhone maker sent to Congress on Monday. The decision clears the way for Parler, an app popular with conservatives including some members of the far right, to be downloaded once again on Apple devices. The letter — addressed to Sen. Mike Lee and Rep. Ken Buck and obtained by CNN — explained that since the app was removed from Apple’s platform in January for violations of its policies, Parler “has proposed updates to its app and the app’s content moderation practices.” On April 14, Apple’s app review team told Parler that its proposed changes were sufficient, the letter continued. Now, all Parler needs to do is to flip the switch. The news is seen as a major boost for the First Amendment.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Oath Keeper Leader Claims Police are Training Militias for ‘Civil War’

And the FBI seems to agree with him!

Published

on

At the very end of the first term of Donald Trump’s presidency, we were as close to a civil war as this nation has come in over a dozen decades, and we may not fully appreciate that yet.  We are, perhaps, too close to the events themselves to fully understand just how narrowly we escaped a broader calamity, but we must try to remain vigilant still. Especially if what one of the leaders of the Oath Keepers says is true. The far-right paramilitary the Oath Keepers is home to active-duty law-enforcement officers who are training up other members to prepare for civil war, according to one of the group’s top figures. CBS News’ 60 Minutesprofiled the the increasingly notorious militia on Sunday night, and one of its leaders from Arizona, Jim Arroyo, spoke openly about the close involvement of police officers. “Our guys are very experienced,” said Arroyo. “We have active-duty law enforcement in our organization that are helping to train us. We can blend in with our law enforcement and in fact, in a lot of cases, our training is much more advanced because of our military backgrounds.” And the government seems to already be away of this. Arroyo’s statement was backed up by Javed Ali, an ex-National Security Council senior director and FBI counterterrorism official, who said the Oath Keepers are a “unique and challenging” threat to the U.S. because a “large percentage have tactical training and operational experience in either the military or law enforcement. That at least gives them a capability that a lot of other people in this far-right space don’t have.” Several members of the Oath Keepers were arrested during the January 6th Capitol riot, as they attempted to prevent the certification of the results of the 2020 election by Congress.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week