Connect with us

Politics

Conclusive Evidence of the Obama Administrations Election Meddling

The spin that we’ll hear from the leftist media will be predictable here.

Published

on

Susan Rice

Perhaps one of the most egregious stories in the history of American elections has been simmering for nearly two years, as the liberal left attempts to through a cultural coups against Donald Trump.

The idea that they continue to push, without evidence, is that the populist President benefitted from a known, cozy relationship with clandestine Kremlin forces that somehow affected the outcome of the election.

At first, the left pushed the idea that Donald Trump himself may have been some sort of Russian double agents – an insinuation that Hillary Clinton made several times during debates in the lead up to her embarrassment in November 2016.  Slowly, as Americans began to scoff loudly at the idea, the democrats backed off just a hair, adjusting their story to the tune of Russians infiltrating the conservative media in order to sow distrust against Hillary Clinton and influence the election.

Trending: Paramedics Staying at Hotel Hear Mother's Screams, Jump Fence to Rescue Unresponsive Boy in Pool

This, too, fell apart, when Hillary Clinton fully sabotaged herself with her own collusion and corruption – a political reality that was exposed by the intrepid work of Wikileaks and a possible flash of patriotism by Seth Rich.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think Cubans are fighting for healthcare or freedom from Communism? (1)

  • Do you think Cubans are fighting for healthcare or freedom from Communism?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Now, however, evidence of Russian bots working their narrative via Twitter have emerged.  Worse yet, there is now conclusive evidence of the Obama administration having knowledge of these transgressions and ordering national security agencies to stand down, allowing this nasty subversion of sovereignty.

Michael Daniel confirmed Wednesday that former national security adviser Susan Rice ordered him and his staff to “stand down” in 2016 in regard to Russian attempts to meddle in the 2016 election.

Daniel, special assistant to former President Barack Obama and White House cybersecurity coordinator, told members of the Senate Intelligence Committee that quotes attributed to him in the book, Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump, were an “accurate rendering of the conversation” he had with Rice and his staff.

Daniel’s staff reportedly responded to the order in “disbelief.”

Over the past year, the Obama administration has been criticized for allegedly being aware of Russian attempts to influence the electionyet primarily remaining silent on the subject.

The spin that we’ll hear from the leftist media will be predictable here.  Undoubtedly, they will allege that, in order to gather information about the intrusions, they must have been allowed to continue.

Unfortunately, that excuse is flimsier than a paper towel in a monsoon.

The evidence being “gathered” by Susan Rice during this time was likely never going to be used to stop the Russian, but, rather, it would be used to accuse the Donald Trump campaign of rigging the election, thusly delegitimizing the will of We The People in 2016.

Shame is an ugly cologne, and I imagine that the D.C. swamp smells fairly ripe this week.

 

Opinion

New Pork Rules Could Outlaw Bacon in California

This would be an unforgivable overreach by the state government.

Published

on

There are plenty of times in which Americans engage in a bit of exaggeration at the expense of our federal government.  It’s a defense mechanism, really, in which we are trained to extrapolate the worst possible outcome of any interaction with our elected officials, to guard against abuse at the hands of the tyrannical among us. Very rarely do these sorts of predictions come true.  Truly, this is just part of the American DNA, and it has deep roots in the caffeinated waters of Boston Harbor back in 1773. And if you thought that a new tax on tea was a flimsy enough excuse to rail against the oppressors, what happens when a state government outlaws bacon? At the beginning of next year, California will begin enforcing an animal welfare proposition approved overwhelmingly by voters in 2018 that requires more space for breeding pigs, egg-laying chickens and veal calves. National veal and egg producers are optimistic they can meet the new standards, but only 4% of hog operations now comply with the new rules. Unless the courts intervene or the state temporarily allows non-compliant meat to be sold in the state, California will lose almost all of its pork supply, much of which comes from Iowa, and pork producers will face higher costs to regain a key market. The threat is no hogwash, either. California’s restaurants and groceries use about 255 million pounds of pork a month, but its farms produce only 45 million pounds, according to Rabobank, a global food and agriculture financial services company. The National Pork Producers Council has asked the U.S. Department of Agriculture for federal aid to help pay for retrofitting hog facilities around the nation to fill the gap. Hog farmers said they haven’t complied because of the cost and because California hasn’t yet issued…

Continue Reading

Politics

Pro-Trump PACs Rake in The Dough, Setting Former POTUS Up with Massive War Chest

The sheer value of Trump’s coffers is nigh unprecedented.

Published

on

Despite his arbitrary removal from both Twitter and Facebook, former President Donald Trump continues to exude a great deal of sway over the American political ecosystem…and he’s only going to get more influential from here. Trump and his surrogates are still months away from officially announcing anything as far as 2024 goes, but, with the 2022 midterms just around the corner, the MAGA machine is already beginning to get tuned up. And let’s just say that there is plenty of fuel in the tank, too. Former President Donald Trump’s political committees brought in $82 million during the first half of 2021 and have $102 million in the bank, according to federal filings made public Saturday evening. The figures, shared first with POLITICO, underscore the profound reach of Trump’s fundraising power. While the former president is out of office and has been deplatformed on social media sites, he maintains a massive online donor network that he could lean on should he wage a 2024 comeback bid. The numbers are extraordinary, historically speaking. The scenario is virtually unprecedented: Never in history has a former president banked nine figures’ worth of donations to power a political operation. Over the first six months of the year, Trump’s political groups whipped up supporters with baseless claims of election fraud to pull in cash on a scale similar to the GOP’s official political arms, the Republican National Committee and the party’s House and Senate campaign committees. The numbers are undoubtedly troubling for liberals listening in from the left side of the aisle, as worries continue to grow about whether or not the Democrats have any shot at holding onto a majority in the House in 15 months’ time.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week