Connect with us

Politics

Conclusive Evidence of the Obama Administrations Election Meddling

The spin that we’ll hear from the leftist media will be predictable here.

Published

on

Susan Rice

Perhaps one of the most egregious stories in the history of American elections has been simmering for nearly two years, as the liberal left attempts to through a cultural coups against Donald Trump.

The idea that they continue to push, without evidence, is that the populist President benefitted from a known, cozy relationship with clandestine Kremlin forces that somehow affected the outcome of the election.

At first, the left pushed the idea that Donald Trump himself may have been some sort of Russian double agents – an insinuation that Hillary Clinton made several times during debates in the lead up to her embarrassment in November 2016.  Slowly, as Americans began to scoff loudly at the idea, the democrats backed off just a hair, adjusting their story to the tune of Russians infiltrating the conservative media in order to sow distrust against Hillary Clinton and influence the election.

Trending: K-Mac Drops the Hammer on Mad Max with Official Censure

This, too, fell apart, when Hillary Clinton fully sabotaged herself with her own collusion and corruption – a political reality that was exposed by the intrepid work of Wikileaks and a possible flash of patriotism by Seth Rich.

take our poll - story continues below

Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?

  • Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Now, however, evidence of Russian bots working their narrative via Twitter have emerged.  Worse yet, there is now conclusive evidence of the Obama administration having knowledge of these transgressions and ordering national security agencies to stand down, allowing this nasty subversion of sovereignty.

Michael Daniel confirmed Wednesday that former national security adviser Susan Rice ordered him and his staff to “stand down” in 2016 in regard to Russian attempts to meddle in the 2016 election.

Daniel, special assistant to former President Barack Obama and White House cybersecurity coordinator, told members of the Senate Intelligence Committee that quotes attributed to him in the book, Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump, were an “accurate rendering of the conversation” he had with Rice and his staff.

Daniel’s staff reportedly responded to the order in “disbelief.”

Over the past year, the Obama administration has been criticized for allegedly being aware of Russian attempts to influence the electionyet primarily remaining silent on the subject.

The spin that we’ll hear from the leftist media will be predictable here.  Undoubtedly, they will allege that, in order to gather information about the intrusions, they must have been allowed to continue.

Unfortunately, that excuse is flimsier than a paper towel in a monsoon.

The evidence being “gathered” by Susan Rice during this time was likely never going to be used to stop the Russian, but, rather, it would be used to accuse the Donald Trump campaign of rigging the election, thusly delegitimizing the will of We The People in 2016.

Shame is an ugly cologne, and I imagine that the D.C. swamp smells fairly ripe this week.

 

Opinion

Pelosi Gets Ripped for Tone Deaf ‘Thank You’ to George Floyd

Even the mainstream media savaged Madam Speaker.

Published

on

Some of our elected officials really cannot read the room, and Nancy Pelosi seems to be one of them. The House Speaker has been at the forefront of the racial issues that our nation is facing today, which is all fine and good.  This is America, after all, and it certainly doesn’t appear as though we’re seeing liberty and justice for all right now. But the issue is in how Pelosi portrays her feelings on the subject that has many in America cringing. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is facing intense backlash after she thanked George Floyd for “sacrificing your life for justice” Tuesday following the conviction of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin on murder and manslaughter charges. Speaking alongside the Congressional Black Caucus shortly after the verdict was handed down, the top House Democrat looked to the sky and said, “Thank you, George Floyd, for sacrificing your life for justice. “For being there to call out to your mom,” Pelosi went on. “How heartbreaking was that? [To] call out for your mom, ‘I can’t breathe.’ “But because of you and because of thousands, millions of people around the world who came out for justice, your name will always be synonymous with justice,” the speaker added. The callous nature of Pelosi’s “gratitude” was off-putting for many, even within the mainstream media sphere. “Nancy Pelosi thanks George Floyd for being murdered,” Huffington Post editor Philip Lewis summed up. “What in the actual f,” New York Post columnist Karol Markowicz reacted. “Ummm… he didn’t sacrifice his life… he was brutally, horrifically murdered. What the hell is this,” Guardian writer Hannah Parkinson tweeted. “Sacrifice implies he had a choice,” LA Times reporter Melissa Evans similarly wrote. “Oh, that is very bad. Very, very no,” GQ correspondent Julia Ioffe expressed. “real [W]hite person wearing kente…

Continue Reading

Opinion

Maxine Waters Escapes Censure, Goes on MSNBC to Gloat

It certainly doesn’t appear as though Waters has learned her lesson.

Published

on

Maxine Waters is no stranger to controversy, especially when it comes to her vision of the role of violence in the political process. Back in 2018, the California Congresswoman told a group of constituents that they should confront staffers for then-President Donald Trump. “Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up,” Waters told a crowd in California over the weekend. “If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.” Then, just days ahead of the jury’s deliberations in the Derek Chauvin trial, Waters again suggested that Americans should be “more confrontational” regarding the case. This comment drew widespread criticism from her colleagues in Congress, and Maxine was soon facing a censure by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. Now that this effort to admonish Waters has failed, the longtime Democrat seemed to take a victory lap on MSNBC. On MSNBC’s “The ReidOut” Tuesday, Waters knocked the censure efforts led by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif. The vote to table McCarthy’s censure resolution was 216-210 and split along party lines. “Of course, I’m criticized all the time, and of course, the Republicans make a target of me, but as you know, I am passionate on these issues,” Waters told host Joy Reid. “I’m so sorry that it causes pain oftentimes with my colleagues. Many times they’re in these districts where they are frightened, where they have a lot of racism, where they haven’t moved to the point that they can have a decent conversation about these issues and sometimes it’s very difficult for them. “But they stood up with me today,” she added. “They put…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week