Connect with us

News

Congress Is Committing High Crime & Misdemeanor Without Going to Court, Says Impeachment Witness

The tables are beginning to turn…

John Salvatore

Published

on

If you thought the impeachment process surrounding President Trump was a little shady, maybe even a little illegal, it looks like you were absolutely correct. How will the mainstream media move to impugn Jonathan Turley’s character now that he has exposed Congressional Democrats for good? Check this out from Wednesday’s sham hearing, via Daily Wire:

George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley slammed Democrats on Wednesday during their impeachment hearing on the House Judiciary Committee, suggesting that Congressional Democrats would be committing the high crimes and misdemeanors — not President Donald Trump — with the way that they are conducting their impeachment efforts.

Fox News’ Sandra Smith weighed in on Turley’s testimony, saying, “On multiple occasions he reiterated points from his opening statement ‘the record does not establish obstruction in this case’ and he called into question the timing of Democrats in their push for this process asking, ‘why are you trying to break the record with fastest impeachment? fast is not good for impeachment,’ said Jonathan Turley.’”

Trending: WATCH: Schiff Admits Trump’s Impeachment Is About Stopping Him From Winning Re-Election

WATCH:

take our poll - story continues below

Will you be watching the impeachment hearings?

  • Will you be watching the impeachment hearings?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

FNC’s Baier: Turley proved that Dems would be committing “the high crime & misdemeanor”

Here are some more clips from the hearing…

Another…

Another…

One more…

Trump noted that liberal impeachment hoaxer Adam Schiff “is a nut job.”

The Democrats’ second witness in the sham impeachment trial was disgraced Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, an Obama holdover fired by Trump.

Trump sent a tweet about Yovanovitch during her testimony and liberals were quick to claim it was “witness intimidation.”

Jake Tapper was one of those people. However, the CNN host took a quick a thorough beating on social media. Because that’s what happened when libs don’t know what they’re talking about. They get crunched.

Here’s Jake’s tweet:

Amb. Yovanovitch testifies about POTUS and his team smearing her.

During her testimony, Pres. Trump goes on twitter and attacks her.

Asked for her reaction in real time, the witness says she finds the attack intimidating.

A potential article of impeachment, right there.

Here are some reactions explaining how Trump might’ve been out of line, but really didn’t do anything wrong…

1. Trump ridiculous to attack her this am.
2. Saying she was terrible and that he had constitutional authority to fire her is not witness intimidation which is “the threatening of a crucial court witnesses by pressure or extortion to compel him/her to not to testify”

Guys, we get that you feel Orange Man Bad deep in your bones, but this is almost too silly for words. Like, listen to yourselves.

Oh Jake
This is really sad

You need to relax & pace yourself
You’ve got five more years of this

Peak stupidity has been reached.

Clown show leader Adam Schiff (D-CA) also said Trump’s tweets were “witness intimidation.”

Schiff: “We saw today witness intimidation in real time by the President of the United States.”

Texas conservative Ted Cruz wasn’t about to let Schiff get away with it.

This may be the single most ridiculous claim of the Dem show trial. No, the President’s tweeting is not “witness intimidation.” You may not like the tone of some or even many of his tweets, but it’s absurd to suggest that tweeting is an impeachable “high Crime [or] Misdemeanor.”

H/T: Right Scoop

Save conservative media!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Elizabeth Warren Not Interested In Getting Involved In Sanders-Clinton Feud, Says ‘I’m Not Going There’

Published

on

Sen. Elizabeth Warren has fallen behind both Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders in the polls, which is not a great sign this close to the Iowa caucuses, but at the end of the day, it’s still anyone’s game. With the primary so close, many in the Democratic Party have turned on each other and gone after one another in verbal jousting and mudslinging attacks, chief among them Warren and Sanders, with Warren accusing Sanders of saying he didn’t believe a woman could be president. While the smoke is just starting to clear on that a bit, the feud between Bernie and former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton is still alive, and Warren is refusing to get involved in the fray. Check out the details from The Washington Examiner: Elizabeth Warren tried to skirt questions about Hillary Clinton’s claim “nobody likes” her rival for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, Bernie Sanders. “I’m not going there,” the Massachusetts senator, 70, told CBS Friday morning. Clinton, 72, in an interview published this week by the Hollywood Reporter, blasted the Vermont senator, her former 2016 Democratic primary opponent, as “a career politician,” saying she felt “so bad” that “people got sucked into” him. “He was in Congress for years. He had one senator support him. Nobody likes him, nobody wants to work with him, he got nothing done,” the former secretary of state told the outlet. “Bernie and I have worked together for a very long time, and we continue to do so. I’ve said all I’m going to say about this,” Warren said before turning to the topic of impeachment. Warren has obviously realized that her attacks against Bernie backfired on her in a big way so now she’s trying to avoid getting pulled into another battle that could potentially hurt her chances…

Continue Reading

News

Brand New Poll Reveals That A Plurality Of Americans On Board With Soleimani Killing

Published

on

Liberals all across the country displayed their true colors by coming out in support of a radical Islamic terrorist, one who killed an untold number of American soldiers and horribly oppressed his own people in Iran after President Trump ordered the drone strike that killed Gen. Qassem Soleimani. These folks despise the president so much that they took the side of a terrorist, strangely seeming to believe that their opinions on this would reflect the feelings of most Americans. A new poll proves that is totally not the case at all. In fact, a plurality of Americans support the president’s decision to take out Soleimani. Here’s more on the poll from The Washington Examiner: The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll released Friday found 41% of Americans approved of Trump authorizing Soleimani’s death while 30% of Americans opposed the authorization. While more Americans supported the killing than opposed it, 59% of Americans disapproved of Trump’s handling of foreign policy overall. The poll comes three weeks after the United States killed the Iranian terrorist leader. The strike came in response to Iranian-backed militias attacking the U.S. Embassy in Iraq. Trump described the killing as a “no bullshit” mission. Iran responded by firing over a dozen missiles at bases housing U.S. troops. The Iranian strikes injured 11 Americans but resulted in no deaths. Once again, this poll demonstrates that a lot of individuals in the Democratic Party are on the wrong side of an issue, led there by their own desire to see President Trump impeached and removed from office. In short, they have become so used to hating the president and attacking him over every move he makes that it has become their default reaction, even when he does something good, to criticize him and oppose him. Will this…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend