Linkedin Share
Opinion

Congress Is Committing High Crime & Misdemeanor Without Going to Court, Says Impeachment Witness

Linkedin Share

If you thought the impeachment process surrounding President Trump was a little shady, maybe even a little illegal, it looks like you were absolutely correct. How will the mainstream media move to impugn Jonathan Turley’s character now that he has exposed Congressional Democrats for good? Check this out from Wednesday’s sham hearing, via Daily Wire:

George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley slammed Democrats on Wednesday during their impeachment hearing on the House Judiciary Committee, suggesting that Congressional Democrats would be committing the high crimes and misdemeanors — not President Donald Trump — with the way that they are conducting their impeachment efforts.

Fox News’ Sandra Smith weighed in on Turley’s testimony, saying, “On multiple occasions he reiterated points from his opening statement ‘the record does not establish obstruction in this case’ and he called into question the timing of Democrats in their push for this process asking, ‘why are you trying to break the record with fastest impeachment? fast is not good for impeachment,’ said Jonathan Turley.’”

WATCH:

FNC’s Baier: Turley proved that Dems would be committing “the high crime & misdemeanor”

Trending:
Massive Migrant Caravan Marches Toward US with LGBT Flags Flying as Mexican President Snubs Biden at Summit

Here are some more clips from the hearing…

Another…

Another…

One more…

Related:
Lake Lanier Trends on Twitter After 'Haunted' Spot Claims Another Victim

Trump noted that liberal impeachment hoaxer Adam Schiff “is a nut job.”

The Democrats’ second witness in the sham impeachment trial was disgraced Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, an Obama holdover fired by Trump.

Trump sent a tweet about Yovanovitch during her testimony and liberals were quick to claim it was “witness intimidation.”

Jake Tapper was one of those people. However, the CNN host took a quick a thorough beating on social media. Because that’s what happened when libs don’t know what they’re talking about. They get crunched.

Here’s Jake’s tweet:

Amb. Yovanovitch testifies about POTUS and his team smearing her.

During her testimony, Pres. Trump goes on twitter and attacks her.

Asked for her reaction in real time, the witness says she finds the attack intimidating.

A potential article of impeachment, right there.

Here are some reactions explaining how Trump might’ve been out of line, but really didn’t do anything wrong…

1. Trump ridiculous to attack her this am.
2. Saying she was terrible and that he had constitutional authority to fire her is not witness intimidation which is “the threatening of a crucial court witnesses by pressure or extortion to compel him/her to not to testify”

Guys, we get that you feel Orange Man Bad deep in your bones, but this is almost too silly for words. Like, listen to yourselves.

Oh Jake
This is really sad

You need to relax & pace yourself
You’ve got five more years of this

Peak stupidity has been reached.

Clown show leader Adam Schiff (D-CA) also said Trump’s tweets were “witness intimidation.”

Schiff: “We saw today witness intimidation in real time by the President of the United States.”

Texas conservative Ted Cruz wasn’t about to let Schiff get away with it.

This may be the single most ridiculous claim of the Dem show trial. No, the President’s tweeting is not “witness intimidation.” You may not like the tone of some or even many of his tweets, but it’s absurd to suggest that tweeting is an impeachable “high Crime [or] Misdemeanor.”

H/T: Right Scoop

Submit a Correction →



Tags:
, , , ,
Linkedin Share
About the Author:
John Salvatore has been a Writer and Editor of multiple political blogs since early 2015. He earned his Master’s degree in Public Administration upon completion of a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science. A diehard Los Angeles Dodgers fan, John can be reached at [email protected].




Conversation