Connect with us


Crenshaw On Warren Wanting to Cancel Student Debt: It Is ‘The Definition of Buying Votes’

Sounds pretty accurate…

John Salvatore



College students are in a lot of debt. On average, it’s about $29,000 per person. I would know. I’m right there with them, as I am one class short of obtaining a master’s degree. But cancelling student debt and making college free is absolutely ridiculous. It is about personal responsibility.

Students know when they sign up for classes that they are making a commitment to pay back the borrowed cash if they can’t pay out of pocket. That’s how life works. No free lunch. No handouts.

For radically far-left presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren to say she wants student debt eliminated, it proves she knows nothing about economics. After all, someone will have to pay back the money. And if the students don’t, the taxpayers will. Why is that so hard to understand?

Trending: Maxine Waters Escapes Censure, Goes on MSNBC to Gloat

From Daily Wire:

take our poll - story continues below

Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?

  • Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

On Friday, Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) appeared on “Fox & Friends” on Fox News to discuss the ongoing Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.

During his time on the show, Crenshaw was asked about a recent exchange between 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and a voter who confronted the candidate over her student debt cancellation policy proposal.

Crenshaw said, “He’s asking the question that a lot of Americans would like to ask Elizabeth Warren, and Bernie Sanders, and everybody who’s offering to cancel student debt. It’s a false sense of compassion that they’re offering. They always cloak their policies in compassion, but it’s a lie. This isn’t fair. It’s not fair to take from other people and give to someone else just because you want their votes. That’s the definition of buying votes.

The Texas Rep. added, “Oh, it absolutely is. If you look to the pandering that these Democratic candidates do, it’s always about getting votes. We’re going to give you something, in return, we want your votes, we want your support – and that’s exactly what they’re doing.

Warren’s tweet:

Ted Cruz’s response:


Thus Far in 2021, Big Tech Has Cracked Down on Free Speech More than Ever Before

Only four months into this year, an analysis finds that Big Tech has worked to eliminate free speech more than ever before.



Only four months into this year, an analysis finds that Big Tech has worked to eliminate free speech more than ever before. An analysis of these fascist efforts to end free speech on the Internet awarded Big Tech a bit fat “F” for its un-American efforts to aid and abet the far-left. Per the Media Research Center: At least 10 separate tech platforms silenced then-sitting President of the United States Donald Trump over the speech he gave in Washington, D.C. the day of the Capitol riot. Both Google and Apple pulled Parler from their app stores. Amazon Web Services also cancelled its contract with Parler, shutting the burgeoning social media site down for more than five weeks. Google removed LifeSiteNews from its advertising programs, and YouTube shut down its channel. YouTube demonetized Steven Crowder’s channels. Amazon removed Ryan T. Anderson’s book examining transgender ideology, and it also removed a Clarence Thomas documentary while continuing to sell at least 270 hate items. That consistent assault on free speech makes 2021 an ideal time to track the biases and failures of Big Tech. Starting with this quarter and going forward every three months, the Media Research Center’s Free Speech America operation will grade the top Big Tech companies, including social media, search media and others that form the backbone of our online lives. This quarter, Big Tech earned a collective “F.” Every one of the Big Tech companies reviewed got an “F” in free speech. That’s simply appalling. The quarter began with unparalleled restriction of the president of the United States. It was unquestionably the low point for online freedom since the creation of the internet. The MRC added its report card: The MRC went on in its report to detail all the reasons why each company in the graph above have…

Continue Reading


The ‘New York Times’ and Its Latest Two Giant Lies

There is no doubt that the ‘New York Times’ is an agent for America’s enemies, but its two recent lies are some of its biggest in years.



New york Times

There is no doubt that the New York Times is an agent for America’s enemies, but its two recent lies are some of its biggest in years. One is the straight up lies about the death of Capitol Hill police officer Brian Sicknick. The Times and the left have been straight out lying about this man’s demise since the instant it occurred. Time and again the left has said as if it is a fact that officer Sicknick died as a direct result of the so-called “capitol insurrection.” We now know for a fact that he did not die as a result of anything that occurred during the riot. But more specifically, we have known since day one that the direct statements of fact uttered by the media has been a lie. They never had any truth or fact to back up their bald-faced lies about Sicknick’s death, and they knew it. As Issues & Insights noted: What did the Times base its story on? Unnamed sources, of course. There were no pictures. No videos. No on-the-record accounts. No medical examiner’s report. The story fell apart, as news emerged — no thanks to the mainstream press — that Sicknick had texted his family about being in good spirits that night. Then we learned that he’d returned to his office after the events at the Capitol, and only later went to the hospital. Why the medical examiner’s report didn’t come out until more than three months had passed is a mystery, but when it was finally released this week, it turned out that Sicknick had died of natural causes — from strokes — not from any injuries during the Capitol Hill melee. The Times could have — and should have — known that its story was false from the beginning, or…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week