Connect with us

News

Crook Kicks Down Door of Mother of Three. He Instantly Regrets It.

This is the very definition of a mama grizzly.

Published

on

A mother of three heard loud banging on the front door of her North Carolina home around 6 a.m. Thursday morning, along with the loud rantings and ravings of a man claiming the house was his.

He later broke the door down, which was a move he would soon come to regret, as the mother in question judicially exercises her Second Amendment right to bear arms.

“He was like, ‘This is my house, let me in. I’m not going to hurt you’ kind of thing, and I was like, ‘What do you want?’” Jones told WSPA-TV.

Trending: ‘Give Us Your Home!’ BLM Demands Homeowners ‘Give Black People Back Their Homes’

‘I have a gun. I will shoot you. Do not come in my house.’

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“After I called the police, I grabbed a gun and went to the top of the steps and was like, ‘I have a gun. I will shoot you. Do not come in my house,’” she added to WSPA.

Indeed, her three young children were asleep in the rooms behind her, the station said — and Jones wasn’t about to let anything happen to them.

The man tried to enter the backdoor, but found it was locked, so he went back to the front door and kicked it in.

This proved to be a massive error in judgment as Jones opened fire, striking the intruder in the shoulder.

Jones told WHNS-TV she didn’t hesitate — and if the man would’ve continued into her home, she would have fired again: “I would’ve killed him if I had to.”

“Any mother is going to protect her kid any way she can,” she said to WSPA. “And that’s what I did.”

Jones went on to tell local media that she was glad to be a gun owner, noting she just bought the weapon a few months ago and recently went through firearms training.

“If I didn’t have a weapon, I wouldn’t have been able to fight him off,” she said.

This is precisely why the Second Amendment exists and why it’s so critical that we take measures to preserve it. Without the right to bear arms, this woman and her children might not have survived this encounter. It’s the sort of tragedy that we need to do more to prevent.

Yes, there are evil, wicked people who use guns to carry out mass murders, and these monsters need to be prevented from having access to these weapons as much as is possible without violating the rights of the innocent. However, anything that prevents law abiding citizens from being able to have the means of self-defense, like strict gun control laws, is out of the question.

Source: TheBlaze

Save conservative media!

News

Biden & Harris Refuse to Answer Questions From the Press — For Third Day In A Row (Video)

They must not have anything to say to the American people…

John Salvatore

Published

on

Donald Trump picked Mike Pence to be his vice presidential running mate in 2016 because the man was the chief executive of a state. Pence had gubernatorial experience, as well as a past in the lower chamber of Congress. Joe Biden, on the other hand, chose Kamala Harris to be his VP running mate because of the color of her skin. That’s literally the only reason. It was a purely political move, as the Biden camp knows they can call everyone racist if they say something negative about Harris – and the media will back them up. But Joe and Commiela had better be careful. If they continue to sidestep even liberal reporters, said liberal reporters are likely to become salty. WATCH: https://twitter.com/KLF/status/1294356550761549824?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1294356550761549824%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.weaselzippers.us%2F Biden is now apparently for defunding law enforcement after many of his radical left-wing peers called for the move weeks ago. From Fox News: Joe Biden said in an interview Wednesday that some funding should “absolutely” be redirected from police, amid calls from some in his party to “defund the police” in the wake of the protests across the country. Biden’s campaign has said he does not support defunding the police. But in a Now This interview with activist Ady Barkan, the presumptive Democratic nominee said that police forces don’t need surplus military equipment, saying this is what leads them to “become the enemy” in a community. WATCH: https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1280904345408745472?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1280904345408745472%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fwatch-joe-biden-agrees-to-defund-the-police-says-he-supports-taking-away-their-responsibilities%2F Here’s a longer version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppoUCQLSXFE&feature=emb_title WATCH: https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/1280907262333087745?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1280907262333087745%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fwatch-joe-biden-agrees-to-defund-the-police-says-he-supports-taking-away-their-responsibilities%2F

Continue Reading

News

Bill Barr: There Will Be ‘Significant Developments’ In Durham Probe Before November Election

It’s about time!

John Salvatore

Published

on

The Durham probe will leave yet another stain on Barack Obama’s record, showing how inept and corrupt the 44th president’s administration truly was. And it’s about time something got done. The left won’t pay much attention to this story, because they know they don’t want to know. You feel me? WATCH: https://twitter.com/M2Madness/status/1294086122558062592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1294086122558062592%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fag-barr-says-there-will-be-significant-developments-in-durham-case-before-the-election%2F More from Fox News: Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith will plead guilty to making a false statement in the first criminal case arising from U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review of the investigation into links between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign, two sources close to the matter tell Fox News. Clinesmith was referred for potential prosecution by the Justice Department’s inspector general’s office, which conducted its own review of the Russia investigation. Specifically, the inspector general accused Clinesmith, though not by name, of altering an email about former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page to say that he was “not a source” for another government agency. Page has said he was a source for the CIA. The DOJ relied on that assertion as it submitted a third and final renewal application in 2017 to eavesdrop on Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Keep America Great!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

No articles were found at this time.

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend