Connect with us

News

Crook Kicks Down Door of Mother of Three. He Instantly Regrets It.

This is the very definition of a mama grizzly.

Published

on

A mother of three heard loud banging on the front door of her North Carolina home around 6 a.m. Thursday morning, along with the loud rantings and ravings of a man claiming the house was his.

He later broke the door down, which was a move he would soon come to regret, as the mother in question judicially exercises her Second Amendment right to bear arms.

“He was like, ‘This is my house, let me in. I’m not going to hurt you’ kind of thing, and I was like, ‘What do you want?’” Jones told WSPA-TV.

Trending: Flashback: Omar Stunned Speechless When Confronted About Her Brother/Husband (Video)

‘I have a gun. I will shoot you. Do not come in my house.’

take our poll - story continues below

Will You Vote For Donald Trump in 2020?

  • Will You Vote For Donald Trump in 2020?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“After I called the police, I grabbed a gun and went to the top of the steps and was like, ‘I have a gun. I will shoot you. Do not come in my house,’” she added to WSPA.

Indeed, her three young children were asleep in the rooms behind her, the station said — and Jones wasn’t about to let anything happen to them.

The man tried to enter the backdoor, but found it was locked, so he went back to the front door and kicked it in.

This proved to be a massive error in judgment as Jones opened fire, striking the intruder in the shoulder.

Jones told WHNS-TV she didn’t hesitate — and if the man would’ve continued into her home, she would have fired again: “I would’ve killed him if I had to.”

“Any mother is going to protect her kid any way she can,” she said to WSPA. “And that’s what I did.”

Jones went on to tell local media that she was glad to be a gun owner, noting she just bought the weapon a few months ago and recently went through firearms training.

“If I didn’t have a weapon, I wouldn’t have been able to fight him off,” she said.

This is precisely why the Second Amendment exists and why it’s so critical that we take measures to preserve it. Without the right to bear arms, this woman and her children might not have survived this encounter. It’s the sort of tragedy that we need to do more to prevent.

Yes, there are evil, wicked people who use guns to carry out mass murders, and these monsters need to be prevented from having access to these weapons as much as is possible without violating the rights of the innocent. However, anything that prevents law abiding citizens from being able to have the means of self-defense, like strict gun control laws, is out of the question.

Source: TheBlaze

Save conservative media!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Watchdog Group Says Trump Broke The Law By Withholding Aid From Ukraine

Published

on

The U.S. government’s congressional watchdog has determined that President Trump and his administration are guilty of breaking the law by withholding hundreds of millions of dollars of military aid from Ukraine during the summer of 2019. The Government Accountability Office published a nine-page report on Thursday that concluded the Officer of Management and Budget violated the Impoundment Control Act when it refused to release $214 million set aside as aide to Ukraine. Here’s more from The Washington Examiner: “Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law,” the independent legislative branch agency concluded. “The Office of Management and Budget withheld funds for a policy reason, which is not permitted under the Impoundment Control Act. The withholding was not a programmatic delay. Therefore, we conclude that the Office of Management and Budget violated the Impoundment Control Act.” The determination comes the same day that the impeachment trial against President Trump related to allegations of abuse of power in Ukraine is set to kick off in the Senate. “The Constitution grants the President no unilateral authority to withhold funds from obligation,” the Government Accountability Office said. “Instead, Congress has vested the President with strictly circumscribed authority to impound, or withhold, budget authority only in limited circumstances as expressly provided in the Impoundment Control Act.” How much this information will impact the impeachment trial remains to be seen, but it’s definitely not going to make matters any easier for President Trump going forward.

Continue Reading

News

Republican Senator Attacks CNN Reporter; Calls Him A ‘Liberal Hack’

Published

on

Sen. Martha McSally proved in a recent spat with a CNN reporter that she is not the kind of individual you want to mess with. McSally was asked about recent developments that have been unfolding would make her change her mind about impeaching President Trump. To say the answer was a resounding no would be an understatement. McSally ripped into the reporter calling him a “liberal hack.” Someone’s been taking lessons on counterpunching from President Trump. Check out the details from The Washington Examiner: On Wednesday night, Rudy Giuliani’s Ukrainian associate Lev Parnas claimed that “Trump knew” about all of the shady efforts taking place in Ukraine, including the alleged stalking of U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch. Parnas said, “President Trump knew exactly what was going on. He was aware of all my movements. I wouldn’t do anything without the consent of Rudy Giuliani or the president.” On Thursday morning, CNN reporter Manu Raju tried to ask the Arizona Republican about the developments and how it could change her impeachment vote. He asked, “Senator McSally, should the Senate consider new evidence as part of the impeachment trial.” She responded, “Manu, you’re a liberal hack. I’m not talking to you.” Raju followed up, “You’re not going to comment.” McSally brushed him off and echoed her earlier retort of calling him a “liberal hack.” https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1217822020848771074 McSally went on to double down on her claim about Manu being a liberal hack in a video posted to Twitter: https://twitter.com/SenMcSallyAZ/status/1217829609808547841 Well, she’s not wrong. Perhaps Manu is still in the first step of denial about the role he is playing in the modern media? Regardless, he certainly got served by McSally, extra crispy on both sides.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend