If you watched the Michigan post-election hearings on Tuesday, you couldn’t help but marvel at the array of eyewitnesses. They gave detailed testimony about what they encountered on November 3rd and 4th. One witness saw a batch of military ballots, with each and every one of them marked for Joe Biden, and all of these military ballots had been photocopied. This is an odd voting result, as pre-election surveys showed that U.S. law enforcement and military personnel leaned heavily in favor of Donald Trump.
No Stone Unturned
Dozens of other witnesses in Detroit spoke in detail about a truck pulling up at 3:30 a.m., on November 4th, with multi-thousands of completed voter ballots. Another witness saw that the Dominion voting machines were each wired to the Internet – a clear violation of the law. Other witnesses spoke at length how GOP observers in the counting areas were harassed, intimidated, and often removed for the smallest of infractions.
The day before, on November 30, Rudy Giuliani and his team conducted a thorough hearing in Arizona where many eye-witnesses offered detailed testimonies. These witnesses saw large batches of ballots being filled in, doctored, or backdated. Some ballots favoring President Trump were discarded. These Maricopa county witnesses, with no hesitation, were forthright in their testimony, offering intricate details.
One witness discussed 11,000+ questionable ballots processed in a rush – faster than anyone could ascertain their authenticity. Consider such a development in the face of the ‘news’ that Biden ‘won’ the state by less than 11,000 votes.
Totals Tabulated by Turkeys
The day before Thanksgiving, if you watched the Pennsylvania election fraud hearings, also conducted by Rudy Giuliani and the Trump legal team, an amazing number of articulate witnesses came forward. They offered voluminous specifics about election fraud and ballot tampering, all in the favor of Biden.
The big news was when Ret. Colonel. Phil Waldren, an ex-Army combat officer with expertise in data and electronic warfare, showed that a large batch of Pennsylvania ballots recorded 570,000 votes for Joe Biden, versus 3,204 for Donald Trump. Attendees gasped. The rate at which these ballots could be processed exceeded the capacity of the counting equipment.
Barf Bags Ready
Despite all this first-person, eyewitness, affidavit-backed testimony – all of it presentable in a court of law – added to many more revelations of massive election voter fraud occurring in Wisconsin, Nevada, Virginia, and Georgia, the Attorney General of the U.S., the dishonorable William Barr, strangely commented to the AP.
Barr said that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been following up on specific information and complaints that they’ve received. “To date,” he said, “we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election.” Later, he claimed that the AP misrepresented his meaning. Really? He was quoted verbatim, and he ought to know by now that offering such a statement will be twisted by Leftist media.
How exactly does the top law enforcer in the land offer such a conclusion, even an interim conclusion? In hearings in the three aforementioned states, eyewitness testimony, by people who’ve made sworn statements – affidavits, subject to perjury – have collectively identified far more fraudulent votes than the margins by which Joe Biden apparently won. How exactly does this happen in our Republic? Whom did the FBI question, if not these people? To Barr, we now know, it doesn’t matter how many people have already testified.
Oh, Now You Tell Us
Next, still on December 1st, Barr offers the news that the John Durham investigation into the Trump/Russia hoax was elevated on October 19 to a special counsel investigation. He held back the news in October to not interfere with the election.
What about announcing this in, say, early September? Surely Barr (and Durham) knew enough, 40 days earlier, to have made that call. If the Democrat higher-ups, and Leftist operatives knew that Durham was now heading a special counsel, perhaps we’d have encountered less interference in the November 3rd election. Who can say?
Bill Barr is a disgrace as attorney general. He usually talks a good game, but his behavior now is so nonsensical as to bar him from the position. It doesn’t matter how many top government officials Trump has already fired or what the press says about the rate at which Trump replaces such officials.
Many nine-year olds, viewing the hearings, would be more astute than Bill Barr. He needs to go and be replaced by someone who’s got the moral rectitude, public relations smarts, and bearing to handle the position.