Connect with us

News

DAVIDSON: Bill Barr’s Barfable Behavior

Bill Barr usually talks a good game, but his behavior now is nonsensical.

Jeff Davidson

Published

on

If you watched the Michigan post-election hearings on Tuesday, you couldn’t help but marvel at the array of eyewitnesses. They gave detailed testimony about what they encountered on November 3rd and 4th. One witness saw a batch of military ballots, with each and every one of them marked for Joe Biden, and all of these military ballots had been photocopied. This is an odd voting result, as pre-election surveys showed that U.S. law enforcement and military personnel leaned heavily in favor of Donald Trump.

No Stone Unturned

Dozens of other witnesses in Detroit spoke in detail about a truck pulling up at 3:30 a.m., on November 4th, with multi-thousands of completed voter ballots. Another witness saw that the Dominion voting machines were each wired to the Internet – a clear violation of the law. Other witnesses spoke at length how GOP observers in the counting areas were harassed, intimidated, and often removed for the smallest of infractions.

The day before, on November 30, Rudy Giuliani and his team conducted a thorough hearing in Arizona where many eye-witnesses offered detailed testimonies. These witnesses saw large batches of ballots being filled in, doctored, or backdated. Some ballots favoring President Trump were discarded. These Maricopa county witnesses, with no hesitation, were forthright in their testimony, offering intricate details.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?

  • Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

One witness discussed 11,000+ questionable ballots processed in a rush – faster than anyone could ascertain their authenticity. Consider such a development in the face of the ‘news’ that Biden ‘won’ the state by less than 11,000 votes.

Totals Tabulated by Turkeys

The day before Thanksgiving, if you watched the Pennsylvania election fraud hearings, also conducted by Rudy Giuliani and the Trump legal team, an amazing number of articulate witnesses came forward. They offered voluminous specifics about election fraud and ballot tampering, all in the favor of Biden.

The big news was when Ret. Colonel. Phil Waldren, an ex-Army combat officer with expertise in data and electronic warfare, showed that a large batch of Pennsylvania ballots recorded 570,000 votes for Joe Biden, versus 3,204 for Donald Trump. Attendees gasped. The rate at which these ballots could be processed exceeded the capacity of the counting equipment.

Barf Bags Ready

Despite all this first-person, eyewitness, affidavit-backed testimony – all of it presentable in a court of law – added to many more revelations of massive election voter fraud occurring in Wisconsin, Nevada, Virginia, and Georgia, the Attorney General of the U.S., the dishonorable William Barr, strangely commented to the AP.

Barr said that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been following up on specific information and complaints that they’ve received. “To date,” he said, “we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election.” Later, he claimed that the AP misrepresented his meaning. Really? He was quoted verbatim, and he ought to know by now that offering such a statement will be twisted by Leftist media.

How exactly does the top law enforcer in the land offer such a conclusion, even an interim conclusion? In hearings in the three aforementioned states, eyewitness testimony, by people who’ve made sworn statements – affidavits, subject to perjury – have collectively identified far more fraudulent votes than the margins by which Joe Biden apparently won. How exactly does this happen in our Republic? Whom did the FBI question, if not these people? To Barr, we now know, it doesn’t matter how many people have already testified.

Oh, Now You Tell Us

Next, still on December 1st, Barr offers the news that the John Durham investigation into the Trump/Russia hoax was elevated on October 19 to a special counsel investigation. He held back the news in October to not interfere with the election.

What about announcing this in, say, early September? Surely Barr (and Durham) knew enough, 40 days earlier, to have made that call. If the Democrat higher-ups, and Leftist operatives knew that Durham was now heading a special counsel, perhaps we’d have encountered less interference in the November 3rd election. Who can say?

Bill Barr is a disgrace as attorney general. He usually talks a good game, but his behavior now is so nonsensical as to bar him from the position. It doesn’t matter how many top government officials Trump has already fired or what the press says about the rate at which Trump replaces such officials.

Many nine-year olds, viewing the hearings, would be more astute than Bill Barr. He needs to go and be replaced by someone who’s got the moral rectitude, public relations smarts, and bearing to handle the position.

News

TX School Administrator Suggests Teaching ‘Opposing Viewpoints’ to The Holocaust

State level authorities were quick to shut that theory down.

Published

on

There is apparently some sever confusion in the Lone Star State regarding the nature of a new law regarding public school curriculums, and it has many around the nation alarmed.

The idea of school as a place to open your mind and absurd a variety of different viewpoints is nothing new.  In fact, it isn’t hard to argue that this is perhaps exactly what the public education system should be doing.

But there are some viewpoints out there that do not meet the standard of our civilized society, and one school administrator in Texas appears to believe that the new law requires these heinous conspiracy theories to become part of the classroom.

A top administrator with the Carroll Independent School District in Southlake advised teachers last week that if they have a book about the Holocaust in their classroom, they should also offer students access to a book from an “opposing” perspective, according to an audio recording obtained by NBC News.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?

  • Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Gina Peddy, the Carroll school district’s executive director of curriculum and instruction, made the comment Friday afternoon during a training session on which books teachers can have in classroom libraries. The training came four days after the Carroll school board, responding to a parent’s complaint, voted to reprimand a fourth grade teacher who had kept an anti-racism book in her classroom.

A Carroll staff member secretly recorded the Friday training and shared the audio with NBC News.

“Just try to remember the concepts of [House Bill] 3979,” Peddy said in the recording, referring to a new Texas law that requires teachers to present multiple perspectives when discussing “widely debated and currently controversial” issues. “And make sure that if you have a book on the Holocaust,” Peddy continued, “that you have one that has an opposing, that has other perspectives.”

State officials were quick to point out that this is not what the new law suggests.

Clay Robison, a spokesman for the Texas State Teachers Association, a union representing educators, said there’s nothing in the new Texas law explicitly dealing with classroom libraries. Robison said the book guidelines at Carroll, a suburban school district near Fort Worth, are an “overreaction” and a “misinterpretation” of the law. Three other Texas education policy experts agreed.

“We find it reprehensible for an educator to require a Holocaust denier to get equal treatment with the facts of history,” Robison said. “That’s absurd. It’s worse than absurd. And this law does not require it.”

Some lawmakers responded as well.

State Sen. Bryan Hughes, an East Texas Republican who wrote Senate Bill 3, denied that the law requires teachers to provide opposing views on what he called matters of “good and evil” or to get rid of books that offer only one perspective on the Holocaust.

“That’s not what the bill says,” Hughes said in an interview Wednesday when asked about the Carroll book guidelines. “I’m glad we can have this discussion to help elucidate what the bill says, because that’s not what the bill says.”

Denial of The Holocaust, (or the severity of it), has long been seen as a hallmark of white supremacists, and is considered a form of antisemitism.

There is apparently some sever confusion in the Lone Star State regarding the nature of a new law regarding public school curriculums, and it has many around the nation alarmed. The idea of school as a place to open your mind and absurd a variety of different viewpoints is nothing new.  In fact, it isn’t hard to argue that this is perhaps exactly what the public education system should be doing. But there are some viewpoints out there that do not meet the standard of our civilized society, and one school administrator in Texas appears to believe that the new law requires these heinous conspiracy theories to become part of the classroom. A top administrator with the Carroll Independent School District in Southlake advised teachers last week that if they have a book about the Holocaust in their classroom, they should also offer students access to a book from an “opposing” perspective, according to an audio recording obtained by NBC News. Gina Peddy, the Carroll school district’s executive director of curriculum and instruction, made the comment Friday afternoon during a training session on which books teachers can have in classroom libraries. The training came four days after the Carroll school board, responding to a parent’s complaint, voted to reprimand a fourth grade teacher who had kept an anti-racism book in her classroom. A Carroll staff member secretly recorded the Friday training and shared the audio with NBC News. “Just try to remember the concepts of [House Bill] 3979,” Peddy said in the recording, referring to a new Texas law that requires teachers to present multiple perspectives when discussing “widely debated and currently controversial” issues. “And make sure that if you have a book on the Holocaust,” Peddy continued, “that you have one that has an opposing, that has other perspectives.” State…

Continue Reading

News

Laundrie Lawyer Goes on the Offensive After TV Host Implicates Parents

Someone’s getting testy…

Published

on

The story of Gabby Petito’s death has captured the attention of the nation in recent weeks, largely due to the strange circumstances surrounding her disappearance, her fiancé’s unwillingness to cooperate with police, his parents’ bizarre behavior, and then, of course the fact that he went missing just hours before Petito’s body was found.

None of these things have screamed innocence in the eyes of the Americans who’ve been following along at home, and Laundrie’s disappearance has allowed speculation to run rampant.

This is true not only for the Joe Anybody, but for television detectives as well, and this hasn’t sat well with a lawyer for the Laundrie family.

Brian Laundrie’s attorney Steve Bertolino tore into “America’s Most Wanted” creator John Walsh Thursday, the morning after the longtime TV host aired an ID channel special on the unsolved homicide of the Florida man’s former fiancée, Gabby Petito.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?

  • Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Gabby Petito: ID Special Report” delved into the details surrounding the 22-year-old Petito’s slaying and Laundrie’s status as a fugitive on a federal bank fraud warrant.

Walsh has long suggested that Brian may have made a run for the border, or be hiding out on the Appalachian Trail – a place that he was once familiar with.

This is where Bertolino got testy.

“I absolutely believe that his family is helping him stay on the run,” said Walsh, who also hosts “In Pursuit with John Walsh” on ID.

Bertolino snapped back at such speculation.

“Dusty relics like that Dog and John Walsh need a tragic situation like this so they can clear the cobwebs off their names and give their publicity-hungry egos some food,” Bertolino told Fox News Digital, also taking aim at Duane “Dog” Chapman, the reality TV star and real-life bounty hunter who entered the search for Laundrie late last month.

Police have returned to the vast wilderness of the Carlton Reserve in their search for Laundrie, this time bringing K-9 units trained to detect human decomposition.

 

 

The story of Gabby Petito’s death has captured the attention of the nation in recent weeks, largely due to the strange circumstances surrounding her disappearance, her fiancé’s unwillingness to cooperate with police, his parents’ bizarre behavior, and then, of course the fact that he went missing just hours before Petito’s body was found. None of these things have screamed innocence in the eyes of the Americans who’ve been following along at home, and Laundrie’s disappearance has allowed speculation to run rampant. This is true not only for the Joe Anybody, but for television detectives as well, and this hasn’t sat well with a lawyer for the Laundrie family. Brian Laundrie’s attorney Steve Bertolino tore into “America’s Most Wanted” creator John Walsh Thursday, the morning after the longtime TV host aired an ID channel special on the unsolved homicide of the Florida man’s former fiancée, Gabby Petito. “Gabby Petito: ID Special Report” delved into the details surrounding the 22-year-old Petito’s slaying and Laundrie’s status as a fugitive on a federal bank fraud warrant. Walsh has long suggested that Brian may have made a run for the border, or be hiding out on the Appalachian Trail – a place that he was once familiar with. This is where Bertolino got testy. “I absolutely believe that his family is helping him stay on the run,” said Walsh, who also hosts “In Pursuit with John Walsh” on ID. Bertolino snapped back at such speculation. “Dusty relics like that Dog and John Walsh need a tragic situation like this so they can clear the cobwebs off their names and give their publicity-hungry egos some food,” Bertolino told Fox News Digital, also taking aim at Duane “Dog” Chapman, the reality TV star and real-life bounty hunter who entered the search for Laundrie late last month. Police…

Continue Reading
The Schaftlein Report

Latest Articles

Best of the Week