Connect with us

Opinion

DAVIDSON: Democrats Are Shamefully Subverting & Weaponizing Impeachment

Straight facts.

Jeff Davidson

Published

on

Impeachment was supposed to be a vital and rarely used mechanism used by Congress, for the protection of the people, in response to egregious acts committed by the U.S. president or others in government. Instead, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer, Jerry Nadler, and all the rest of the vicious Democrats in Congress, as well as six RINOs have used it as a convenient weapon of choice against Donald Trump because they hate him with a passion that exceeds all rationality.

Note to Democrats and RINOs: Hatred is insufficient grounds for drafting articles of impeachment. If so, impeachment proceedings for Obama would have been initiated ASAP.

Bogus from the Start

Trending: Another Local Reporter Stops Mid-Broadcast to Inform Station She Is Taking Them Down

The first Trump impeachment over a phone call, which was part of the public record, had numerous people on line at the same time. Donald Trump had no quid pro quo with the Ukraine government. Former Vice President Joe Biden did. He and his family pocketed millions from his pay-for-play schemes with Ukraine, Russia, Kazakhstan, Romania, and China.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration? (1)

  • Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The Democrats all knew this, but they didn’t care. Impeachment was a ready made tool, sitting there, ready for their use. Never mind that their bogus assault upset 244 years of American governance. Never mind that it contorts the effectiveness and reputation of Congress, the trust of the people, and centuries old protocols.

The venal, vindictive Nancy Pelosi chose to proceed anyway, because after all, Donald Trump must be stopped, right? He only created the greatest economy that the country had seen in decades, increased minority employment and home ownership in unprecedented ways, stopped ISIS dead cold in their tracks, helped peace break out in the Middle East, promulgated an endless supply of energy so that we became not only independent, but an energy exporter, and so on.

One could fill an encyclopedia with what Donald Trump accomplished in four years. None of that matters to Nancy Pelosi and Company; they need to permanently harm Trump politically. So, following the Capitol riot which, has repeatedly been proven that Trump did not incite, she invoked impeachment once again.

The Theatre of the Absurd

Here in February, we have Donald Trump ‘voted’ out of office as a result of massive fraud and being accused of something that he did not do. Make no mistake, Pelosi’s intent as dangerous to the country as anything that we’ve witnessed since our founding. She’s using impeachment as a weapon to punish an adversary, devoid of evidence, fairness, and any semblance of ethics.

Contemplate this: If Donald Trump or anybody else in America, for that matter, plans to give a public presentation at a rally or protest, and people infiltrate the event are we to hold responsible those sponsoring or speaking at the event? In Washington, on January 6th, President Trump’s rally was infiltrated by members of Antifa, as well as several right-wing groups. It has been proven that in advance these groups intended to disrupt the day’s proceedings, in one way or another.

Correspondence and communication between group members show that they intended to march on the Capitol, and cause whatever disturbance they could. If we blame Donald Trump for these intruders, and their criminal actions, and decide that he is liable, we are taking a path unlike any other taken before: There is no way to protect our First Amendment rights after.

All speakers, at all times, forevermore, could be subject to prosecution as a result of the behavior and activities of those who show up at an event, and, most chillingly, as a result of the behavior and activities of those otherwise seeming to have been influenced by the speaker at any time.

Raindrops Falling on Everyone’s Head

Not surprisingly, when you unleash a storm as Nancy Pelosi and company have, and overturn centuries of precedence, be prepared for what happens thereafter.

Only a single day after Biden was sworn into office, Congresswoman Marjorie Greene (R-Ga.) filed articles of impeachment. And why not? Joe has a long, slimy history of corruption while in office. As vice president of the United States, he besmirched the responsibilities and protocols of his office. The numerous times he engaged in pay-for-play schemes, with his son Hunter as a front man, has been well documented.

As President, however, Biden would have to make some kind of huge, instantaneously transgression to justifiably be impeached.

Pelosi and the Democrats, suffering from a totaling crippling case of Trump Derangement Syndrome, can’t see past their own hatred as to the long-term harm they do to America.

Opinion

All the News That’s Fit to Fud

In the U.S., the mainstream press continues to perpetrate the lie that they offer an objective, balanced view of what’s happening in the world. They continue to do this because, sadly, enough fools buy what they say lock, stock, and barrel.

Published

on

New york Times

The New York Times has ignored dozens of potential stories on Joe Biden’s bumbling and on Hunter Biden’s laptop, drug abuse, sexual escapades, virulent racism, pay-for-play schemes, and shady deals. Any Trump offspring involved in 1% of Hunter’s transgressions would yield virtually endless coverage in the Times. Terror at the Top In 90 years has anything changed at the New York Times? In 1932 and 1933, the Times deliberately buried the story known as the ‘Terror-Famine,’ that astoundingly killed at least 3.9 million Ukrainians, but by some estimates perhaps as many as 7.0 million: At least one out of every eight people, and possibly as much as one out of every four people.  Times editors were well aware that the famine was orchestrated by Joseph Stalin who forbade outside food and aid shipments, confiscated household food items, and restricted of the mobility of Ukranian citizens. Why did Stalin do this to a region known as “the world’s breadbasket”?  He sought to punish independence-minded Ukrainians, quash anyone who represented a threat to his totalitarian government, and vanquish Ukraine’s small farms in favor of Soviet state-run collectives. Stalin lost no sleep over the legions of emaciated bodies, near death, scratching for any morsel of food they could find. ‘Mainstream’ and Maniacal The New York Times chose to bury this heart-wrenching, world-shaking story. Then, as now, their leftist bent was so intense and so all-encompassing that they couldn’t help themselves. The blunt truth is that they do not care who is hurt as long as socialist/Marxist/communist ideology prevails on earth. Propping up the Biden Administration is automatic.  One hundred years from now, is it realistic to believe that the facades which the mainstream media perpetrates daily on Americans and on free people around the globe will not continue to dominate?  By some chance,…

Continue Reading

Opinion

Desparate Expansion of NYC Trump Probe Targets Ex-Bodyguard

The longer this thing goes on, the harder these prosecutors are having to work to find any dirt on The Don.

Published

on

In New York City, there are powerful people on the hunt for something, anything, that they could use to take down Donald Trump, and this desperate endeavor has turned ever wilder as it goes on. Having Trump’s tax returns and access to his former “fixer” Michael Cohen is not enough for these allegedly competent prosecutors, however, and they are now going to take a look at folks like Trump’s ex-bodyguard. New York prosecutors investigating former President Donald Trump’s business have advised Trump’s former bodyguard and current chief operating officer, Matthew Calamari, and his son that they should get their own lawyers, not use the Trump Organization’s attorneys, The Wall Street Journal reports, citing people familiar with the matter. Prosecutors are reportedly looking into whether the Calamaris have illegally avoided paying taxes on benefits provided by the Trump Organization, including housing and cars. New York City District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. has been investigating the Trump Organization for a few years, focused most recently on whether the company manipulates the value of its properties to get loans and lower its taxes. Vance’s prosecutors are similarly investigating, and widely believed to be trying to gain the cooperation of, Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg, but they don’t appear to have had much luck yet. Now it appears their interest in these benefits extends beyond Weisselberg, the Journal reports, noting that neither Calamari or Weisselberg have been accused of wrongdoing. The Calamaris have taken the prosecutors’ advice and hired Nicholas Gravante Jr., who has represented former AIG head Maurice “Hank” Greenberg and Hunter Biden, among other prominent clients, the Journal reports. The prosecutors who are targeting the Trump organization have been at it for years already, and, after having garnered the aforementioned materials, have still not pressed any charges.  One could imagine that,…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week