;
Connect with us

News

Democrats Losing on Voter ID as Poll Finds Huge Support for ID Requirements

The Democrats are on the losing side of the voter ID issue as a new poll finds that a majority of Americans support voter ID requirements.

Published

on

The Democrats are still on the losing side of the voter ID issue as a new poll finds that a huge majority of Americans support voter ID requirements.

The new poll released by Honest Elections Project found 81 percent of the voters surveyed support requiring an ID to be able to cast a ballot.

In fact, despite the left’s drumbeat that voter ID laws are “racist,” the number that supports voter ID actually went up. The number rose 4 percentage points from March to July, and even increased by 13 among Blacks.

The survey was taken among 1,200 registered voters between July 8 to the 17th. It has a margin of error of 3 percentage points.

take our poll - story continues below

Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?

  • Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Democrats have spent more than a decade trying to fool the country into thinking that requiring Americans to show a legal ID to vote is somehow “racist.” It is a “left over” from the days of “Jim Crow,” they say.

This is all nonsense.

Democrats even claim that the voter ID laws that do exist are examples of “voter suppression.”

And that is a flat out lie because even the left-wing Brookings Institute has found that blacks have a higher turnout rate than other minorities and at times — in 2012 and 2016 — had a higher voting rate than whites. Also, black voting has risen with every election since 1990, well before voter ID laws began.

With their own arguments they have been patently racist themselves. Arguing that blacks are too stupid to know where to get an ID is a pretty racist assumption, after all.

Still, the left has pumped up lying losers such as former leftist Georgia candidate for Governor Stacey Abrams who to this day insists that she did not lose the 2018 election despite losing by more than 50,000 legal votes.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

News

New Peer Reviewed Paper Blasts COVID Vaccinations for Children

A new peer reviewed article reveals major questions suggesting that vaccinating kids for COVID is simply not useful.

Published

on

A new peer reviewed article (meaning other scientists approved it) reveals major questions suggesting that vaccinating kids for COVID is simply not useful.

The article published in Toxicology Reports and written by Ronald N. Kostoff, is titled “Why are we vaccinating children against Covid-19?” According to Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology used in the Covid vaccines, the new article is an in-depth analysis of existing data from various government sources. But it isn’t just about kids, it covers the whole response to the pandemic.

This article was peer reviewed, meaning that other scientists read it, considered the evidence, and found the paper’s conclusions to be credible. This is no half-assed “study.” It is a comprehensive look at the evidence.

Rob Jenkins of Townhall.com summarizes:

take our poll - story continues below

Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?

  • Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

First, from the introduction, here’s what Kostoff, et al. have to say about the roll-out and possible impact of the vaccines: “Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term…had samples not representative of the total population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power….Further, the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated predisposition to serious diseases….[or] long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.”

About the “vaccines” themselves: “A vaccine is legally defined as any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of one or more diseases….A January 2000 patent application that defined vaccines as ‘compositions or mixtures that when introduced into the circulatory system of an animal will evoke a protective response to a pathogen’ was rejected by the U.S. Patent Office because ‘the immune response produced by a vaccine…must be protective….[It must be] a compound which prevents infection.’ In the remainder of this article, we use the term ‘inoculated’ rather than vaccinated, because the injected material in the present COVID-19 inoculations prevents neither viral infection nor transmission. Since its main function in practice appears to be symptom suppression, it is operationally a ‘treatment.’”

On the reported 600,000-plus Covid deaths: “Most deaths attributed to COVID-19 were elderly with high comorbidities….Attribution of death to one of many possible comorbidities or especially toxic exposures in combinations is highly arbitrary and can be viewed as a political decision more than a medical decision. For over 5% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 4.0 additional conditions or causes per death. These deaths with comorbidities could equally have been ascribed to any of the comorbidities. Thus, the actual number of COVID-19-based deaths in the USA may have been on the order of 35,000 or less, characteristic of a mild flu season.”

The authors conclude that there seems to be no reason to vaccinate kids for the virus.

“There appears to be modest benefit from the inoculations to the elderly population most at risk, no benefit to the younger population not at risk, and much potential for harm from the inoculations to both populations. It is unclear why this mass inoculation for all groups is being done, being allowed, and being promoted,” the authors wrote.

Like many conservatives have been pointing out for over a year, there is just no reason to vaccinate or mask children.

None.

And it’s child abuse to do so.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

A new peer reviewed article (meaning other scientists approved it) reveals major questions suggesting that vaccinating kids for COVID is simply not useful. The article published in Toxicology Reports and written by Ronald N. Kostoff, is titled “Why are we vaccinating children against Covid-19?” According to Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology used in the Covid vaccines, the new article is an in-depth analysis of existing data from various government sources. But it isn’t just about kids, it covers the whole response to the pandemic. This article was peer reviewed, meaning that other scientists read it, considered the evidence, and found the paper’s conclusions to be credible. This is no half-assed “study.” It is a comprehensive look at the evidence. Rob Jenkins of Townhall.com summarizes: First, from the introduction, here’s what Kostoff, et al. have to say about the roll-out and possible impact of the vaccines: “Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term…had samples not representative of the total population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power….Further, the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated predisposition to serious diseases….[or] long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.” About the “vaccines” themselves: “A vaccine is legally defined as any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of one or more diseases….A January 2000 patent application that defined vaccines as ‘compositions or mixtures that when introduced into the circulatory system of an animal will evoke a protective response to a pathogen’ was rejected by the U.S. Patent Office because ‘the immune response produced by a vaccine…must be protective….[It must be] a compound which prevents infection.’ In the remainder of this article, we use the term ‘inoculated’ rather than vaccinated,…

Continue Reading

News

SEE IT: Amtrak Train Derails in Montana, Killing Several and Injuring Dozens

Investigators still don’t know what caused the derailment.

Published

on

In a cruel twist of irony, the end of Rail Safety Week was marred by tragedy in Montana on Saturday, as an Amtrak passenger train careened of the tracks in Montana, perplexing investigators.

The incident caused a vast majority of the 10-car train to derail, injuring dozens and killing at least three people.

Amtrak joined federal safety officials Sunday to investigate a Montana train derailment that left at least three people dead, seven people hospitalized and rural communities scrambling to provide food and shelter to the stunned survivors.

The westbound Empire Builder train with 141 passengers and 17 crew members derailed Saturday afternoon near Joplin, a town of less than 200 people a few miles from the Canadian border in Liberty County. The tragedy occurred as Amtrak was closing out its nationwide, annual Rail Safety Week.

take our poll - story continues below

Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?

  • Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“The NTSB is launching a go-team to investigate Saturday’s derailment of Amtrak’s Empire Builder train,” the National Transportation Safety Board said on Twitter, adding that the team would be based in Great Falls, Montana.

Images of the carnage were soon trending on social media.

Our thoughts and prayers go out to the families of those involved.

In a cruel twist of irony, the end of Rail Safety Week was marred by tragedy in Montana on Saturday, as an Amtrak passenger train careened of the tracks in Montana, perplexing investigators. The incident caused a vast majority of the 10-car train to derail, injuring dozens and killing at least three people. Amtrak joined federal safety officials Sunday to investigate a Montana train derailment that left at least three people dead, seven people hospitalized and rural communities scrambling to provide food and shelter to the stunned survivors. The westbound Empire Builder train with 141 passengers and 17 crew members derailed Saturday afternoon near Joplin, a town of less than 200 people a few miles from the Canadian border in Liberty County. The tragedy occurred as Amtrak was closing out its nationwide, annual Rail Safety Week. “The NTSB is launching a go-team to investigate Saturday’s derailment of Amtrak’s Empire Builder train,” the National Transportation Safety Board said on Twitter, adding that the team would be based in Great Falls, Montana. Images of the carnage were soon trending on social media. https://twitter.com/newsbyjessica/status/1441904036437954563?s=20 https://twitter.com/AP/status/1441942622449192961?s=20 https://twitter.com/ThisIsMarietta/status/1441946955781869569?s=20 https://twitter.com/IntelPointAlert/status/1441941735026876418?s=20 Our thoughts and prayers go out to the families of those involved.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week