Connect with us

Opinion

Democrats Ruin the Economy With Reckless Abandon

Progressivism stifles the economy, divides a nation, and ruins lives.

Jeff Davidson

Published

on

          “The Federal Government must and shall quit this business of relief.”

          “The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. It is inimical to the dictates of a sound policy. It is in violation of the traditions of America. Work must be found for able-bodied but destitute workers.”  

          “I am not willing that the vitality of our people be further sapped by the giving of cash, of market baskets, of a few hours of weekly work cutting grass, raking leaves, or picking up papers in the public parks. We must preserve not only the bodies of the unemployed from destitution but also their self-respect, their self-reliance, and courage and determination.” 

On many levels, the quotes above by U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt, in his 1935 State of the Union Address, are astounding. Less than three years into his presidency, Roosevelt realized that having legions of citizens dependent on the federal government, long-term, would not benefit anyone. Yet, he could not put the brakes on the train he had sent running down the track. 

And Enormous Debt to Boot

Another four years passed when Roosevelt’s close friend, lunch companion, confidant, and U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., stated:

          “We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work. And I have just one interest, and if I am wrong, somebody else can have my job. I want to see this country prosperous. I want to see people get a job. I want to see people get enough to eat. We have never made good on our promises, I say after eight years of this administration — we have just as much unemployment as when we started. And, an enormous debt to boot!”

Coming nearly a decade following the stock market crash of 1929, which reverberates to this day, the above quote represents a stunning admission, no less than by the top U.S. financial official. Morgenthau discovered that deficit spending does not work, does not effectively stimulate the economy, and does not create long-term, meaningful jobs.

Results? Who Cares?

Progressivism stifles the economy, divides a nation, and ruins lives. The Biden Administration, the most ‘progressive’ since our nation’s founding, is steeped in the same economic theory and ideology that has uniformly led to ruin all over the globe. The worthy, if misguided, attempts of Franklin Roosevelt, were introduced one score following the ill-founded and corrupt progressivism of Woodrow Wilson. 

The results which Roosevelt witnessed should have been sufficient for any government leader, who has studied U.S. history, to avoid heading down the same path. Biden, if he never awakes from his stupor, might prove to be even worse than Obama in stifling the economy. 

Progressives, liberals, Green New Dealers, and the Left in general, however, do not care at all about the historical record. They are steeped in their own rhetoric. If a policy sounds good, then by golly, it must be good! Never mind about the results. Never mind about decades of research on human motivation, incentive, and drive. 

Dr. Thomas Sowell, in a three-article series, documented the failings of progressives when it comes to results. Now 57 years following Lyndon Johnson’s initiation of “The Great Society,” in 1965, with $22 trillion spent – and gone – on massive progressive programs, the U.S. poverty rate by 2016 was higher than it had ever been. This monetary outlay is equivalent to far more than $13,000 per year, for every minority person in America, for all the years from 1965 to 2016. That’s more than one quarter million dollars, per person, in two score. Yet, Great Society target group members are banging on the doors of Congress, demanding reparations.

Devastation on Multiple Fronts

The black family has been devastated, rising from 25% out- of-wedlock births or one parent households in 1964, to above 70% one-parent households today. “The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it,” observed author Flannery O’Connor. Progressives do not want to take responsibility for what they have done and so they have resurrected racism as the all-purpose excuse as to why large percentages of minorities have not effectively entered the economic mainstream.

We thus have the perfect “Catch 22.” Over many decades, create and enforce policies that lead to miserable lives, rioting in the streets, more crime, and cultural depression. Then, blame everything on the opposition party and the majority group that had little or nothing to do with enacting such policies, call them racists, make them feel guilty, and induce Congress to throw more money at the problem. 

In sum, progressivism is a crippling, cultural cancer that erodes a nation. It is delivered in a sugar cube by committees of “benevolent” leaders.

 

Opinion

Pence v. Trump 2024? Former Veep Leaves the Door Open

WHOA!

Published

on

There has been an incredible amount of speculation as to whether or not Donald Trump will be again running for President in 2024, and there are a number of factors still at play that could create seismic shifts in the race to come.

For instance, if Trump’s former Vice President Mike Pence were to decide to run against him in 2024’s primary…

Mike Pence is not ruling out the possibility of going head-to-head with his old boss Donald Trump in a 2024 Republican presidential primary, a new report suggested on Monday.

‘We’ll go where we’re called,’ Pence told the New York Times when asked about the possible head-to-head.

‘That’s the way Karen and I have always approached these things.’

Trump was not thrilled with the idea.

Meanwhile Trump, despite not formally declaring a 2024 bid yet, has eyes on the competition – including Pence.

In a statement to DailyMail.com, his spokesman slammed his old deputy as ‘desperate’ and mocked him for trying to ‘chase’ his ‘lost relevance’ amid the former running mates’ latest divide over backing separate candidates in the Peach State’s gubernatorial election.

Former President Trump is said to be waiting until after the 2022 midterms to make an official announcement regarding 2024, but there have been plenty of hints regarding his potential campaign – the latest of which came from former First Lady Melania Trump.

 

There has been an incredible amount of speculation as to whether or not Donald Trump will be again running for President in 2024, and there are a number of factors still at play that could create seismic shifts in the race to come. For instance, if Trump’s former Vice President Mike Pence were to decide to run against him in 2024’s primary… Mike Pence is not ruling out the possibility of going head-to-head with his old boss Donald Trump in a 2024 Republican presidential primary, a new report suggested on Monday. ‘We’ll go where we’re called,’ Pence told the New York Times when asked about the possible head-to-head. ‘That’s the way Karen and I have always approached these things.’ Trump was not thrilled with the idea. Meanwhile Trump, despite not formally declaring a 2024 bid yet, has eyes on the competition – including Pence. In a statement to DailyMail.com, his spokesman slammed his old deputy as ‘desperate’ and mocked him for trying to ‘chase’ his ‘lost relevance’ amid the former running mates’ latest divide over backing separate candidates in the Peach State’s gubernatorial election. Former President Trump is said to be waiting until after the 2022 midterms to make an official announcement regarding 2024, but there have been plenty of hints regarding his potential campaign – the latest of which came from former First Lady Melania Trump.  

Continue Reading

Opinion

Verdict Reached in First Russian War Crimes Trial

This is just the first of many, certainly.

Published

on

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has been a brutal one, and increasingly so as the Kremlin’s soldiers find themselves in more and more trouble of their own making.

As the war grows ever more impossible for Russia to win, the troops sent into Ukraine have been committing a series of worsening atrocities.  It’s terrorism at the least, (and very likely a full-fledge genocide), and it belies just how poorly things are going for Russia.

Now, in the first war crimes trial of the conflict, a verdict has been reached.

In the first of what could be a multitude of war crimes trials held by Ukraine, Russian Sgt. Vadim Shishimarin, 21, was sentenced for the killing of a 62-year-old man who was shot in the head in a village in the northeastern Sumy region in the opening days of the war.

Shishimarin, a member of a tank unit, had claimed he was following orders, and he apologized to the man’s widow in court.

His Ukraine-appointed defense attorney, Victor Ovsyanikov, argued his client had been unprepared for the “violent military confrontation” and mass casualties that Russian troops encountered when they invaded. He said he would appeal.

There was no doubt about the court’s legitimacy, either.

Ukrainian civil liberties advocate Volodymyr Yavorskyy said it was “an extremely harsh sentence for one murder during the war.” But Aarif Abraham, a British-based human rights lawyer, said the trial was conducted “with what appears to be full and fair due process,” including access to an attorney.

Given the sheer amount of heinous deeds the world has witnessed in Ukraine, there is no doubt that more war crimes trials will be coming.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has been a brutal one, and increasingly so as the Kremlin’s soldiers find themselves in more and more trouble of their own making. As the war grows ever more impossible for Russia to win, the troops sent into Ukraine have been committing a series of worsening atrocities.  It’s terrorism at the least, (and very likely a full-fledge genocide), and it belies just how poorly things are going for Russia. Now, in the first war crimes trial of the conflict, a verdict has been reached. In the first of what could be a multitude of war crimes trials held by Ukraine, Russian Sgt. Vadim Shishimarin, 21, was sentenced for the killing of a 62-year-old man who was shot in the head in a village in the northeastern Sumy region in the opening days of the war. Shishimarin, a member of a tank unit, had claimed he was following orders, and he apologized to the man’s widow in court. His Ukraine-appointed defense attorney, Victor Ovsyanikov, argued his client had been unprepared for the “violent military confrontation” and mass casualties that Russian troops encountered when they invaded. He said he would appeal. There was no doubt about the court’s legitimacy, either. Ukrainian civil liberties advocate Volodymyr Yavorskyy said it was “an extremely harsh sentence for one murder during the war.” But Aarif Abraham, a British-based human rights lawyer, said the trial was conducted “with what appears to be full and fair due process,” including access to an attorney. Given the sheer amount of heinous deeds the world has witnessed in Ukraine, there is no doubt that more war crimes trials will be coming.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week