Denmark Sends Criminal Undocumented Immigrants to Remote Island — US Dems Give Them Sanctuary
In America, Democrats have no problem providing sanctuary to illegal aliens.
To them, it’s no big deal.
After all, why dedicate time to homeless Americans, right?
In Denmark, they take things a step further.
In fact, they do something the United States would never do – probably not even under President Donald Trump.
Denmark banishes criminal aliens to a remote island.
From Telegraph:
Foreign criminals sentenced to deportation are to be banished to a remote island off the coast of Denmark, the country’s government has announced.
Finance minister Kristian Jensen said the criminals will be detained at a facility on Lindholm, an uninhabited seven-hectare island in the province of Vordingborg.
The tough scheme was set up as part of an agreement between Denmark’s conservative coalition government and its anti-immigration ally, the Danish People’s Party (DF).
Udviste, kriminelle udlændinge har INTET at gøre i Danmark. Indtil vi kan komme af med dem, flytter vi dem nu ud på øen Lindholm i Stege Bugt, hvor de vil have pligt til at opholde sig på det nye udrejsecenter om natten. Og der vil være politi til stede døgnet rundt. Sådan!#dkpol pic.twitter.com/YybG4zkwQi
— Dansk Folkeparti (@DanskDf1995) November 30, 2018
In 2015, Hillary Clinton boasted about voting to build “barriers” on the southern border to keep out illegal aliens while she was a senator.
In 2009, Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said illegal immigration is “wrong.”
However, President Donald Trump chose to tweet out a 2005 clip of former President Barack Obama basically saying illegals were not welcome in America, noting that illegals “disrespect the rule of law.”
Obama: “Those who come here illegally and those who employ them disrespect the rule of law and they are showing disregard for following the law. We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked, circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently and lawfully to become immigrants in this country.”
Trump agrees with Obama.
WATCH:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1054874705491120133?%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1054874705491120133&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fbwahahaha-trump-retweets-video-of-obama-saying-we-cant-allow-illegals-to-pour-into-our-country%2F
On Hillary’s stance from 2015, per Weekly Standard:
“Well look, I voted numerous times when I was a senator to spend money to build a barrier to try to prevent illegal immigrants from coming in. And I do think you have to control your borders.”
WATCH:
On Schumer circa 2009, via Fox News Insider:
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has been an outspoken critic of President Trump’s immigration policies.
But in a speech in 2009, Schumer espoused views against illegal immigration that sound strikingly similar to what President Trump has said since 2015.
WATCH:
Republicans today will agree with then-Senator Harry Reid (D-NV).
He says “no sane country” would give birthright citizenship to illegal immigrants.
Reid declared on the Senate floor: “If making it easy to be an illegal alien isn’t enough, how about offering a reward for being an illegal immigrant? No sane country would do that, right? Guess again.”
“If you break our laws by entering this country without permission and give birth to a child, we reward that child with U.S. citizenship and guarantee a full access to all public and social services that this society provides, and that’s a lot of services.”
WATCH:
From Daily Wire:
President Donald Trump said on Monday that he would pursue an executive order to outlaw birthright citizenship just days before the November midterm elections, which, as expected, caused a meltdown from the political Left.
Women from Mexico and many, many other nations come to America by any means necessary in order to give birth.
This give’s their children American citizenship by default.
What ends up happening is the American-born kids don’t get deported and often times neither do the mothers (or fathers).
It is a system of which plenty of Americans are not fond.
Why it matters: This would be the most dramatic move yet in Trump’s hard-line immigration campaign, this time targeting “anchor babies” and “chain migration.” And it will set off another standoff with the courts, as Trump’s power to do this through executive action is debatable, to say the least.
WATCH:
The problem with the EO is that Trump may run into trouble constitutionally.
Enter South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham (R), who plans to introduce legislation to make the process easier:
Finally, a president willing to take on this absurd policy of birthright citizenship. https://t.co/kCa0ko7P76
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) October 30, 2018
I’ve always supported comprehensive immigration reform – and at the same time – the elimination of birthright citizenship.
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) October 30, 2018
The United States is one of two developed countries in the world who grant citizenship based on location of birth.
This policy is a magnet for illegal immigration, out of the mainstream of the developed world, and needs to come to an end.
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) October 30, 2018
In addition, I plan to introduce legislation along the same lines as the proposed executive order from President @realDonaldTrump.
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) October 30, 2018
Do you agree with Trump and…Harry Reid?