Connect with us

News

Failed Democrat Gubernatorial Candidate Still Claims She WON Election Six Months Later

Talk about a sore loser!

John Salvatore

Published

on

The fact that the 2018 midterm elections were nearly six months ago is one thing.

Having to continue to talk about failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams is another.

She has still yet to accept that she lost to Brian Kemp. Likewise, she still may have not even officially conceded the race.

Trending: Nearly $17 Million Given to Hunter Biden Was ‘Stolen From Ukrainian Citizens,’ Report Says

Check it out, per Daily Wire:

take our poll - story continues below

Will Democrats win the house and senate in 2020?

  • Will Democrats win the house and senate in 2020?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Abrams, who lost by nearly 55,000 votes to Republican Brian Kemp, continued to claim without evidence that the election was somehow not fair to her as she also bragged about having “a dramatic increase in turnout.”

Abrams claimed that her refusal to accept the fact that she lost her election was different than President Donald Trump raising concern over voter fraud, despite the fact that there is proof to back up some of what Trump says about voter fraud including a report published today about 10 people charged in Oregon for alleged voter fraud in the 2016 presidential election.

Abrams noted, “Trump offers no empirical evidence to meet his claims. I make my claims based on empirical evidence, on a demonstrated pattern of behavior that began with the fact that the person I was dealing with was running the election. If you look at my immediate reaction after the election, I refused to concede. It was largely because I could not prove what had happened, but I knew from the calls that we got that something happened.

Abrams once set the Peach State’s flag on fire. She’s also apparently considering a run for president.

Can’t be Kemp, but can take down Trump? What kind of sorcery is this?

From CNN:

Stacey Abrams, a rising star in the Democratic Party, said Monday it was possible she could seek her party’s presidential nomination next year.

Abrams’ comment came after an interview at the South by Southwest conference in Texas, where Abrams reportedly said she previously thought 2028 would be the earliest she could run for president, but over Twitter, she clarified: “Now 2020 is definitely on the table.”

About that pesky ol’ flag burning, via The Hill:

Abrams stood on the steps of the Georgia Capitol in 1992 and burned the Georgia state flag which was viewed as a symbol of white supremacy due to its Confederate design, The New York Times reported.

Does Abrams not know that illegals can’t vote?

Abrams once voted to confiscate guns. She says she did it just to “start a conversation.”

Will anyone believe that reason?

And “start a conversation” about what, exactly?

Actually banning guns, of course.

WATCH:

Check out what Black Panthers, who chanted “black power,” did for Abrams…

https://twitter.com/TheShannonBurke/status/1058837697282932736?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1058837697282932736&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theamericanmirror.com%2Fphotos-armed-new-black-panthers-rally-vote-for-stacey-abrams%2F

Do these Black Panthers know Abrams wants to confiscate their guns?

Will Abrams condemn the Black Panthers for carrying?

Save conservative media!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

FBI Official Under Investigation for Altering Doc Allowing Agency to Spy On Trump Campaign

Don’t kid yourself. This is a big deal…

John Salvatore

Published

on

This is a big deal if there ever was a big deal. And in case you weren’t clear, yes, it is a big deal. Here’s the deal, via “fake news” CNN: An FBI official is under criminal investigation for allegedly altering a document that was central to the FBI’s surveillance of a Trump campaign official in 2016, according to a new report from CNN. “The finding is expected to be part of Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s review of the FBI’s effort to obtain warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act on Carter Page, a former Trump campaign aide,” CNN reported. “Horowitz turned over evidence on the allegedly altered document to John Durham, the federal prosecutor appointed early this year by Attorney General William Barr to conduct a broad investigation of intelligence gathered for the Russia probe by the CIA and other agencies, including the FBI. The altered document is also at least one focus of Durham’s criminal probe.” WATCH: THE FIX WAS IN… FBI official allegedly altered document that was basis for FISA warrant on surveillance of the 2016 Trump campaign. https://twitter.com/CaliforniaPanda/status/1197665317675294722?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1197665317675294722&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Fbreaking-fbi-official-under-criminal-investigation-for-altering-document-used-to-start-probe-into-trump-campaign Reactions: And CNN puts it in paragraph 2 – bc this is the most important thing – that Trump will accuse the FBI of wrongdoing in this investigation. Well, yeah! https://twitter.com/AshleeLee4848/status/1197665554955419650?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1197665554955419650&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fbrettt-3136%2F2019%2F11%2F21%2Freport-fbi-official-who-allegedly-altered-document-related-to-2016-russia-probe-under-investigation%2F Well would you look at that. Suddenly people in our MSM want to do their jobs before that report comes out Dec 9th… https://twitter.com/guntotingteabag/status/1197667744344399873?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1197667744344399873&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fbrettt-3136%2F2019%2F11%2F21%2Freport-fbi-official-who-allegedly-altered-document-related-to-2016-russia-probe-under-investigation%2F The Republicans have been talking about this for 3 years. #JusticeIsComing https://twitter.com/JIMBAUR/status/1197665823562719232?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1197665823562719232&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fbrettt-3136%2F2019%2F11%2F21%2Freport-fbi-official-who-allegedly-altered-document-related-to-2016-russia-probe-under-investigation%2F The FBI also altered Flynn’s 302. William Barr is going to drop the hammer and nobody will be left to cover for each other 🇺🇸 https://twitter.com/shelby60235316/status/1197666898005020672?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1197666898005020672&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fbrettt-3136%2F2019%2F11%2F21%2Freport-fbi-official-who-allegedly-altered-document-related-to-2016-russia-probe-under-investigation%2F If the Democrats and a handful of intelligence community personnel escape accountability for this, it’s over for the country. The deep state can…

Continue Reading

News

Adam Schiff Says President Trump’s Actions Are Worse Than ‘Anything Nixon Did’ (Details)

Based on……what??

John Salvatore

Published

on

Democrat California Congresslady Adam Schiff doesn’t know much about history. Schiff, a beta male, might actually be completely ignorant. His statement on Nixon vs. Trump pretty much makes it clear. From The Hill: House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) used his closing remarks in Thursday’s hearing to lay out the case for impeaching President Trump and plead for Republicans to look beyond their party, arguing that the president’s actions toward Ukraine go “beyond anything Nixon did.” Schiff argued that Trump’s abuse of power was clear and on a more significant scale than the Watergate break-in that eventually led to the impeachment of former President Richard Nixon. For whatever reason, Schiff stated, “The difference between then and now is not the difference between Nixon and Trump, it’s the difference between that Congress and this one. And so we are asking … where are the people who are willing to go beyond their party to look to their duty?” WATCH: Rep. Adam Schiff: “What we’ve seen here is far more serious than a third rate burglary of the Democratic headquarters.” “Where is Howard Baker? Where are the people who are willing to go beyond their party to look to their duty?” https://twitter.com/ABCPolitics/status/1197629141522075648?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1197629141522075648&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fhomenews%2Fadministration%2F471565-schiff-says-trumps-actions-go-beyond-anything-nixon-did POTUS called out Schiff for being the lying [insert word here] that he is. And in typical Trump fashion, he spoke the truth and did so with confidence. See for yourself… If Shifty Adam Schiff, who is a corrupt politician who fraudulently made up what I said on the “call,” is allowed to release transcripts of the Never Trumpers & others that are & were interviewed, he will change the words that were said to suit the Dems purposes. Republicans… https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1191155312084082688?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1191155312084082688&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Ftrump-correctly-says-adam-schiff-would-alter-transcripts-of-impeachment-testimony-to-suit-the-dems-purposes%2F ….should give their own transcripts of the interviews to contrast with Schiff’s manipulated propaganda. House Republicans must have…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend