News

Flashback: Biden Goes On Record, Says ‘No One Needs An AR-15. Period.’

He knows better than you.

Published

5 months ago

January 14, 2021

John Salvatore

Parler Facebook Twitter

*Originally published February 2020* Like a good Democrat, 2020 presidential hopeful Joe Biden knows what’s best for you. Never mind the absolute fact that guns save lives. That always goes overlooked by the left.

But Joe is probably up most nights wondering why he’s trailing behind Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg in the polls, huh? Could it be reasons like this quote? Could it be that people just don’t like the guy?

There’s no wrong answer, really. The walking gaffe-machine just doesn’t connect with people as well as some in the mainstream media want Americans to believe.

LOOK:

No one needs an AR-15. Period. We have to get these weapons of war out of our communities.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration? (1)

Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration?
Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration?*

Yes.

Yes, but only parts.

Not a chance.
Email*

Email
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) February 15, 2020

Reactions:

Don't need you telling me what I need or don't need.

— Kerry 🇺🇸 (Gab: kerry2017) (Parler: k1erry) (@K1erry) February 16, 2020

No one needs a presidential candidate who doesn’t know what state he’s in at any given time. Period. We have to get these clueless career politicians out of our communities.

— SETH WEATHERS (@sethweathers) February 16, 2020

How many ignorant Democrats are there? Too freaking many

An AR15 is NOT a weapon of war.

AR stands for ArmaLite Rifle — the maker.

AND, it’s one pull of the trigger per shot.

It’s not automatic rifle. Those are illegal. #WalkAwayFromDemocrats

— A Nation Reborn 🇺🇸 (@CalFreedomMom) February 15, 2020

Go ask the Venezuelians eating their dogs if they would prefer a 5 round or 30 round mag when trying to get their freedom.

— Res Nullius (@Cor1613) February 15, 2020

Since you think our military uses the typical AR15 that I even own, it’s more proof of WHY you should never be President.
PS: “AR” does not stand for “assault rifle.” 🤦‍♀️

— SeldenGADawgs (@SeldenGADawgs) February 16, 2020

https://twitter.com/naked_an/status/1229025881693310978?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1229025881693310978&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fsamj-3930%2F2020%2F02%2F16%2Fso-much-ouch-joe-biden-learns-the-hard-way-why-you-never-tell-conservatives-what-they-do-and-dont-need%2F

If a politician says you don't need a gun, it's time to buy a gun.

— Samuel Culper 722, also on GAB @politiwars (@politiwars) February 16, 2020

Good thing you don't get to decide what I need. Only I get to decide that. pic.twitter.com/jTSl167cjj

— Tactical-reviews.com®️ (@Tactical_review) February 16, 2020

Oh look. Government telling me what I don’t need to defend myself. That’s always worked out well for society. 🙄

— Freedom Recon (@FreedomRecon) February 15, 2020

https://twitter.com/Woodys360/status/1229015970913624066?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1229015970913624066&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fsamj-3930%2F2020%2F02%2F16%2Fso-much-ouch-joe-biden-learns-the-hard-way-why-you-never-tell-conservatives-what-they-do-and-dont-need%2F

How many people were killed by rifles (of any kind) in 2018? 297

How many people were killed by knives? 1,515

Blunt objects? 443

Being punched/kicked? 672

No more knives or hammers. We should also ban hands and feet. Get them out of our communities!https://t.co/TIO0Z811fZ

— Leonydus Johnson (@LeonydusJohnson) February 16, 2020

https://twitter.com/Jamisen/status/1228837866110955521?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1228837866110955521&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fsamj-3930%2F2020%2F02%2F16%2Fso-much-ouch-joe-biden-learns-the-hard-way-why-you-never-tell-conservatives-what-they-do-and-dont-need%2F

Joe, sweetie, I have actually been to war. Not once did I ever carry and AR into the theatre of Combt. I am pretty sure no one else has ever.

This right here is why you will never be president

Cornpop couldn’t be reached for comment

— Space Woman Spiff 👩🏻‍🚀 (@BellaPelosi) February 16, 2020

No one “needs” $83,000 a month for a no-show job in a foreign country either, but your son took the gig anyway. https://t.co/ChNigd68UR

— Dan Bongino (@dbongino) February 16, 2020

AR-15 is not a weapon of war. And even if it was, weapons of war were the original intent of the second amendment.
The second amendment ensures that the government cannot abridge the other enumerated rights. The only limited rights the government has are the ones we give it. pic.twitter.com/wSLuMACcsn

— The Doctor (@TennantRob) February 16, 2020

Forget the presidency. This man needs his own reality show.

Biden claims that he’s a liberal but his actions over the years tell a different story. He’s not really anything other than ignorant.

This report about the 2020 Democrat frontrunner paying women less than men for three and a half decades while a senator from Delaware should have the left in a tizzy.

But it won’t.

From Free Beacon:

Women working for former vice president Joe Biden were paid less than their male counterparts during the entirety of Biden’s 35 years in the U.S. Senate, according to a Washington Free Beacon analysis.

When Biden joined the Senate in 1973, the average pay for a full-time female staffer in his office was $5,029, about 68 percent of the $7,383 average paid to men during that span, according to the secretary of the Senate’s first spending report for the 93rd Congress. A Free Beacon analysis of spending reports covering Biden’s full Senate tenure found that he never achieved gender pay equity. Over the course of Biden’s time in the Senate, women on average earned just 67 cents for each dollar earned by men.

H/T: Twitchy

Parler Facebook Twitter

Related Topics:AR-15 biden Congress Featured flashback gun control Trump

Up Next

Schaftlein Report | The House Has Impeached. Now What?

Don't Miss

ICYMI: Trump Teases ‘Big Announcement’ — Also May Start Own Social Media Platform

News

Enormous Confederate Carving Subject of Renewed Debate

Will Stone Mountain be vanquished by an army of virtue signalers?

Published

5 hours ago

June 22, 2021

Andrew West

Parler Facebook Twitter

Over the course of the last several years, and with a vast acceleration in 2020, municipalities around the nation have been removing, renaming, and re-dedicating a number of Confederate monuments now deemed offensive in the wake of the Black Lives Matter Movement. Not everyone is a fan of the move, however, with opponents often suggesting that this is a revision of history, and that these men were also American soldiers, in a way. Now, one of the largest Confederate monuments in the world, the carving on the side of Stone Mountain in Georgia, is facing renewed calls for removal. Crowds are growing larger at the monthly meetings of the Georgia board considering what to do about the giant carving of Confederacy leaders in Stone Mountain. But officials seem no closer to an answer. The Stone Mountain Memorial Association decided to make a few changes last month, but they weren’t enough to placate people who want the monument removed. A museum exhibit will tell the story of the carving, as well as the site’s ties to the Ku Klux Klan. But having to make those decisions could increase the volume and the pressure on the board, NPR reports. Critics have pointed out that the carving is a modern piece, and not a relic of a bygone era. “Where we go from there?” asked the board’s chairman, the Rev. Abraham Mosley. “I don’t know.” Putting the site in a Georgia context seems like a challenge. None of the three men—Confederate Gens. Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee, and Confederacy President Jefferson Davis—was from the area, and no battles were fought there. As a piece of history, it’s not that historic, having been completed in 1972. The monument sits within Stone Mountain Park, an amusement park of sorts, that has lost a number…

Parler Facebook Twitter

News

Russia Continues Harassment of American Military Just 35 Miles Off US Coast

That’s a little too close for comfort.

Published

5 hours ago

June 22, 2021

Andrew West

Parler Facebook Twitter

When it comes to dealing with Russia, much of the US policy is straightforward, and likely on account of the fact that the Kremlin has been pulling the same, silly stunts for decades now. In fact, it’s getting a little stale. Russia loves to use her military as a nuisance to the United States, posing danger at times, certainly, but most often just being undeniably annoying. This week was no exception. Russia’s defense ministry has announced it sunk an aircraft carrier just 35 miles off the coast of Hawaii in a huge war games exercise that has alarmed the US. At least 20 Russian warships, submarines, and support vessels, flanked by 20 fighter jets, are taking part in the exercises – the biggest since the Cold War. Russia says that they are 300 miles off the coast of Hawaii, yet unconfirmed satellite images from June 19 appear to show them much closer – within 35 miles of the U.S. state. The moves have forced the US military into action. Twice this month – on June 14 and 18 – the U.S. scrambled F-22s from Hawaii in response to Russian bomber flights. Neither time did the bombers enter the U.S. Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) perimeter, and so they were not intercepted. On June 17 the Navy admitted that the USS Carl Vinson and her strike group were operating near Hawaii, without revealing when they had arrived, or why. It has been only a few days since Russian President Vladimir Putin met with US President Joe Biden in Geneva, in a meeting that both men seemed to suggest was a success. This latest Kremlin aggression begs to differ.