Connect with us

News

Flashback: Biden Wants Female Vice President, But Can’t Name One Woman In Explanation

Just Joe being Joe…

John Salvatore

Published

on

Joe Biden continues to show the nation that he isn’t playing with a full deck. He is quite literally, at this point, playing checkers, while Republicans play chess.

Here’s just another classic Joe moment, via New York Post:

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has at least four women in mind as potential running mates — but had a hard time remembering their names when an Iowa voter asked him Friday who he would choose.

Trending: NBA Reporter Tells Rioters to ‘Burn It All Down,’ Changes Tone When ‘Animals’ Come Near His Home

[…]

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Biden then ran through a list of four prominent Democrats — without using any of their names.

Joe noted, “The former assistant attorney general who got fired who was just in Delaware.”

He was talking about disgraced former acting Attorney General Sally Yates.

Biden went on, “The leader of the, uh, the woman who should’ve been the governor of Georgia, the African American woman.

He was talking about Stacey Abrams, the failed candidate who still believes she lost because she’s black.

Joe added, “The two senators from the state of New Hampshire.

That time he was talking about Democrats Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan.

The guy thrives on making mistakes.

Friday in Iowa was no exception when the former VP did his best to explain the Second Amendment to his incredibly uninformed fanbase.

He blabbered, “I believe in the second amendment but nobody says you can have a rounds — a magazine with a hundred clips in it — a hundred bullets in it. We protect geese more that we protect, no joke, you can only have three shotgun shells when you go shoot for geese. But, guess what, we protect geese better than we do our kids.

WATCH:

Reactions:

https://twitter.com/LAWV66/status/1192896089852174341

Save conservative media!

News

Violent Rioters Burned Home With Kids Inside, Then Blocked Fire Fighters From Getting In

Pure terror!

John Salvatore

Published

on

On Monday morning, just hours removed from a weekend of violent protests all across the nation, Richmond, Virginia Police Chief William Smith described a particularly disturbing event. Smith said, “One incident that is particularly poignant, that truly illustrates the seriousness of the issues we’re facing. Last night protesters intentionally set fire to an occupied building on Broad Street. This is not the only occupied building that has been set fire to in the last two days. But they prohibited us from getting on the scene. We had to force our way to make a clear path for the fire department. The protesters intercepted the fire apparatus several blocks away with vehicles and blocked that fire department’s access to the structure fire. Inside that home was a child.” From NBC12: Chief Smith says last night protesters set fire to a few buildings, including a multi-family residence that was occupied by a child in the 300 block of West Broad Street. As fire crews were arriving, Smith says protesters blocked the engine from reaching the fire. WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEncQKV8k_0&feature=emb_title These people are not protesters. They are animals. They are anarchists. Here’s more riot madness, via Twitter… https://twitter.com/YousefNH2/status/1267637687554650112 https://twitter.com/GeorgiaGuard/status/1267639512219484160 https://twitter.com/FOX10Phoenix/status/1267637055955197952 https://twitter.com/FOXBaltimore/status/1267640847354531840 https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1267635645356351488

Continue Reading

News

Confirmed: Officials Saying Evidence Shows Violent ‘Organized’ Riots Were Planned (Details)

Did anybody think otherwise?

John Salvatore

Published

on

There should be little doubt in the minds of law-abiding Americans that the violent George Floyd “protests” were planned. No question about it. Even some liberal politicians are seeing the light, at least on this issue. From TDW: At least one big-city mayor is now calling on the federal government to investigate what appears to be an “organized” effort to foment unrest and engage in rioting, as security experts in other cities discover evidence that many of the weekend’s violent incidents may have been pre-planned and coordinated. In Chicago, mayor Lori Lightfoot told media Sunday that she believes there is “strong evidence” of an organized effort to use the weekend’s anti-police brutality protests as a cover for violence, Crain’s Chicago Business reports, and said the city is speaking with at least three Federal agencies about a possible joint investigation. Lightfoot noted, “There is no doubt. This was an organized effort last night. There were clearly efforts to subvert the peaceful process and make it into something violent.” Here’s more riot randomness, via Twitter… https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1267611851283525632 https://twitter.com/GAFollowers/status/1267610642170687488 https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1267611343282003969 https://twitter.com/taylorcaniff/status/1267611665509437440 https://twitter.com/Matt_Tinney/status/1267613148690837505 https://twitter.com/SBSNews/status/1267613995382390785 https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1267612227093188608

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend