Connect with us

News

Flashback: Google Execs Delete Social Accounts After Report Shows Anti-Conservative Bias

Welp! That’s no good…

John Salvatore

Published

on

James O’Keefe and “Project Veritas” perform a tremendous service for Americans. They uncover bias against conservatives. It is needed. It is necessary.

While it has been known for a while that Google is extremely anti-conservative, O’Keefe’s latest report has sent some executives running for the hills.

A tweet from O’Keefe:

Trending: McAfee Dead in Prison After Repeatedly Declaring He Would Not Kill Himself

NEW: Google executive Jen Gennai @gennai_jen, who said Congress “can pressure us but we’re not changing,” has deleted her Twitter account. Her Instagram is private, too; it wasn’t before. Google engineer @GauravGite3 has deleted his Facebook.

More from our friends at LibertyHub:

The consolidation of Big Tech has now made it virtually impossible for Americans to exert their right to free speech online, should that speech cast our Silicon Valley informational overlords in a poor light.

The avenues of free speech on the internet should, for all intents and purposes, mirror those avenues of free speech that we have in the real, physical world. Our right to protest in a public place is inalienable according to our Constitution, and places such as Twitter and Facebook have replaced the town square as the optimal soapbox.

It’s not Facebook, Google, or Twitter’s fault – but in choosing to go after information-domination, they were bound to grow to this unwieldy size. Now they’re trying to have their cake, (global internet dominance), and eat it too, (digital fascism). The problem is that their international influence is too large to be considered “private” any longer, yet they hide behind that very distinction in order to push whatever agenda the current big wigs ascribe to.

So when Project Veritas caught a Google executive plainly admitting to her company’s anticipated role in the 2020 election, the Silicon Valley sultans got to work scrubbing the evidence from the internet.

YouTube, the world’s most popular video sharing platform, which is owned by Google, soon took down the videos that were uploaded by Project Veritas, its head James O’Keefe reported. The footage was removed “due to a privacy claim by a third party,” a message now tells anyone trying to view it.

The third party is probably Jen Genai, Google’s head of ‘Responsible Innovation,’ who was featured in the report, discussing the company’s policies in a secretly filmed interview with Project Veritas agents. She also addressed the expose in a blog post, saying that the people she met “lied about their true identities, filmed me without my consent, selectively edited and spliced the video to distort my words and the actions of my employer, and published it widely online.”

George Orwell is rolling his eyes and muttering “I told you so” from beyond the grave.

News

White House Announces Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal

This could be a big boon for a number of American industries as well.

Published

on

Regardless of what you think of Joe Biden touting this latest infrastructure deal as a “win”, it sure is nice to see that our government isn’t completely and utterly broken in the 21st century. It took months of bickering and infighting, and more than a few moments of political pettiness, but it appears as though we may just have an infrastructure deal after all. President Biden announced on Thursday that the White House and a group of bipartisan senators had reached a deal on a $579 billion infrastructure plan. “It’s been a very long time since the last time our country was able to strike a major bipartisan deal on American infrastructure,” Biden said at the White House. Biden said he and congressional Democrats had to concede some on what’s known as “human infrastructure,” such as investments for childcare and spending on climate change. Democrats will instead look to pass additional spending in a separate bill through a Senate budgetary process called reconciliation, which requires only a simple majority to pass legislation. And, despite no one having seen the bill yet, Biden is confident that Congress will send it to his desk to sign in the coming days. The radical left will likely be the most disappointed in the bill, after having previously suggested a goal of a $10 trillion investment in climate change initiatives.

Continue Reading

News

Miami Building Collapsed After Years of Sinking into the Earth

Scientists has determined the issue years ago.

Published

on

Just north of Miami, in the nearby town of Surfside, there is a massive rescue effort underway as nearly 100 people remain unaccounted for in the wake of a residential high-rise’s collapse. That number was nearly double the early estimate, having risen dramatically on Thursday afternoon as more information became available to those leading the effort. The late-night collapse, which was captured on video by a nearby surveillance camera, appeared to be a sudden, freak accident, but new information seems to indicate that there might be more to this story. A Florida high rise that collapsed early Thursday was determined to be unstable a year ago, according to a researcher at Florida International University. The building, which was constructed in 1981, has been sinking at an alarming rate since the 1990s, according to a 2020 study conducted by Shimon Wdowinski, a professor in the Department of Earth and Environment. When Wdowinski saw the news that the Champlain Towers South condominium in Surfside had collapsed, he instantly remembered it from the study, he said. “I looked at it this morning and said, ‘Oh my god.’ We did detect that,” he said. But not everyone agreed with the assessment. Wdowinski said his research is not meant to suggest certainty about what caused the collapse. The building was sinking at a rate of about 2 millimeters a year in the 1990s, and could have slowed or accelerated in the time since, he said. In his experience, even the level of sinking observed in the 1990s typically results in impacts to buildings and their structures, Wdowinski said. He believes that very well could have been the case for the Champlain building in the 1990s, based on his findings. “It was a byproduct of analyzing the data. We saw this building had some kind of unusual…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week