Connect with us

News

Flashback: Supreme Court Might Decide Obamacare’s Fate Before 2020 Election (Details)

Kind of a big deal…

John Salvatore

Published

on

As most conservatives are well aware, Obamacare was unconstitutional from the start considering it originated in the Senate. Now, an appeals court has ruled in the Trump administration’s favor on a major issue.

What this means is the Supreme Court may wind up ruling on the Redistribution of Wealth Act’s Affordable Care Act’s legality before the 2020 presidential election.

In other words, it’s kind of a big deal.

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Here are the details:

A federal appeals court on Wednesday granted a Trump administration request to expedite oral arguments in a case challenging the legality of the Affordable Care Act.

The new time frame — with arguments in early July — means that the fate of Obamacare could come before the Supreme Court next term, with an opinion rendered by June of 2020 in the heart of the presidential campaign.

As in 2016 and the 2018 midterms, health care has already emerged as a core issue, though there are fissures in both parties. Congressional Democrats have rallied around Obamacare, while some of the party’s presidential nominees are supporting “Medicare for All” plans that would offer universal, government-backed health coverage.

President Trump’s big promises to the American people from the start were to build a border wall, stimulate the economy, and fix health care.

Essentially two down, one to go.

Obamacare has failed and will only get worse, as premiums and deductibles continue to rise.

45 has a big announcement about health care that is sure to ruin his predecessor’s day.

From Breitbart:

President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Republicans would take care of Americans worried about their healthcare coverage.

Trump tweeted:

The Republican Party will become “The Party of Healthcare!”

Single-payer health care is government-run health care, plain and simple.

Four 2020 Democrat candidates have now backed Senator Bernie Sanders’ Medicare-for-All plan, virtually ensuring they’ll never become president of the United States.

Their names?

LOOK…

Along with Bernie, Senators Cory Booker of New Jersey, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Kamala Harris of California and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts are all in.

WATCH:

Save conservative media!

News

Joe Biden’s Deputy Campaign Manager Squashes Possibility Of Bailing Out On Debates: ‘We Are Going To Do The Debates’

Published

on

It didn’t take long after the bloodbath that was the first presidential debate Tuesday evening for the mainstream media and many liberals across the country to start panicking and calling for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden to decline to do any further debates with President Trump. The man was pummeled constantly for an hour and a half, meanwhile the president also had to debate moderator Chris Wallace, which just goes to show you what a back alley brawler Trump really is to hold his ground against two enemies coming at him at once. However, Biden’s deputy campaign manager has squashed the idea of avoiding future debates, stating the former vice president would be participating in the events. via Daily Wire: Biden’s deputy campaign manager avowed that Biden would commit to the two next presidential debates, scheduled for October 15 and October 22. According to The Hill, Kate Bedingfield quashed any ideas that Biden would skip the next two debates, saying, “I don’t know how many different ways we can say it. Yes, we are going to do the debates. I would imagine there will be some additional conversations [with the Commission on Presidential Debates]. But yeah, we are committing to attending the debates.” Senator Chris Coons (D-DL), who serves as a Biden surrogate, had informed Politico that he was unsure whether further debates should be held, iterating: It was very hard to follow what was being said, and President Trump showed not just disrespect to the moderator, but to the American people who tuned in trying to figure out what his plans are. The point of the debate is for the American people to make a decision, informed by hearing from the two candidates on what’s your record, what are your values? Joe Biden came prepared to respect the American…

Continue Reading

News

Lindsey Graham Unveils Letter From DOJ Attorney Who Responded To Issues Concerning Carter Page FISA Applications

Published

on

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham revealed a letter he received from a Justice Department attorney who signed off on the surveillance warrant applications that sought out court authority to provide a wiretap on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. In this particular letter, which Graham read out loud and officially entered into the record at a hearing held Wednesday morning with former FBI Director James Comey, the Office of Intelligence attorney stated that he or she wouldn’t have signed off on these warrant applications had they known about the issues that have now been uncovered by the Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz. Here’s more on this developing story via Washington Examiner: “The OI attorney advises that had he/she been aware of the significant errors and omissions identified by the OIG and the errors in the Woods process, he/she would not have signed the filed Page FISA applications,” the letter from Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd to Graham obtained by the Washington Examiner states. “The OI attorney further advises that he/she is not aware of any additional errors or omissions in the Page FISA applications or in the Crossfire Hurricane investigation more generally that were not identified in the OIG Report.” Graham then noted that two ex-DOJ officials who had also signed off on the Page surveillance, former Deputy Attorneys General Rod Rosenstein and Sally Yates, both testified to the panel that they would not have signed off on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants if they knew then what they know now. Four FISA applications and renewals against Page were approved by FBI and DOJ leadership and by the FISA court, including three approvals by Comey. Page has denied any wrongdoing and was never charged with a crime. The hearing Wednesday is the latest in the judiciary panel’s…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend