Connect with us

News

Gaffe Master Biden Boasts of Vermont’s Beauty, Problem Is That He Was In New Hampshire

Can these episodes still be called gaffes?

John Salvatore

Published

on

If a person continually errs on the simplest of things, how much longer can we keep calling it a “gaffe?”

When will the mainstream media begin to finally question Joe Biden’s mental state, because, dude, come on!

While in New Hampshire, Biden boasted of Vermont’s beauty.

Trending: Tokyo Woke No Mo’: IOC Bans BLM Apparel for Olympics

It was pretty funny. But it’s also pretty sad.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Derek Chauvin Receive Proper Due Process?

  • Did Derek Chauvin Receive Proper Due Process?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Biden, who is in New Hampshire, thinks he is in Vermont

At some point, the media is going to have to stop calling this “gaffes”

Reactions:

Damn, time to set the Biden gaffe clock back to 0 days.

How many days in a row have we reset this clock?

Again. I say this not to be cruel. He’s not right. No way he can be close to a position of power. Won’t make the finish line.

What an embarrassment

It’s awful whoever is pushing him to run

The dude is trying to throw the primary.

Three.

Minimum.

That’s how many genders Joe Biden thinks there are in 2019. Because we’re forced to accept liberal lunacy as fact in 2019. Because 2019 is kind of ridiculous.

WATCH:

Biden is attempting to become president of the United States for the third time.

Back in 2007 at a New Hampshire primary debate, handsy Joe was asked about “sanctuary cities.”

He said he wouldn’t allow them.

Biden’s exchange with New England Cable News’s Alison King went as follows:

KING: I’d like to hear from Senator Biden, would you allow these cities to ignore the federal law? [Emphasis added]

BIDEN: The reason that cities ignore the federal law is the fact that there is no funding at the federal level to provide for the kind of enforcement at the federal level you need … Part of the problem is you have to have a federal government that can enforce laws. This administration’s been fundamentally derelict in not funding any of the requirements that are needed even to enforce the existing law… [Emphasis added]

KING: So Senator Biden, yes or no, would you allow those cities to ignore the federal law? [Emphasis added]

BIDEN: No. [Emphasis added]

With everything Joe has said over the years, how in the world is this man the Democrat frontrunner?

It’s almost baffling.

Almost.

H/T: Twitchy

News

Social Media Giant Permanently Banishes Pro-Life News Outlet

So much for free speech.

Published

on

1984

Our nation appears destined to fall into the clutches of a technological oligarchy, headed by the likes of Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg, and there is very little that can be done about it. These two men, who run Twitter and Facebook, respectively, have been ruling their public forums with an iron fist, hiding behind the concept that their private status is a workaround for the First Amendment.  Their gargantuan reach and influence has made it possible for them to act with impunity, steering the narrative on any number of subjects, from Donald Trump to the wonder of maternity. The latest affront to free speech comes to us from Facebook, where a pro-life news organization has been completely banished. Facebook permanently banned LifeSiteNews, a popular pro-life news outlet, for publishing “false information about COVID-19 that could contribute to physical harm.” As justification for unpublishing LifeSiteNews, Facebook cited an article posted on April 10, 2021, titled “COVID vaccines can be deadly for some.” Facebook said they erase Facebook pages that publish “vaccine discouraging information on the platform.” The site’s staff was livid. “This all comes down to another case of Big Tech silencing free speech on their platform,” said LifeSiteNews Marketing Director Rebekah Roberts. “Facebook has been silencing any voice that goes against their beliefs and agenda,” Roberts said. “Our LifeSiteNews Facebook page has been removed simply because we have shared reports of doctors, nurses, expert researchers, and even the former Pfizer VP speaking out against the COVID shots.” This is just the latest in a long line of Orwellian moves by these social media mavens, and may in fact be just another harbinger of something far more sinister to come.

Continue Reading

News

CDC Readies Cruises, Complete with Human Guinea Pigs

Fingers crossed!

Published

on

As the world prepares for its grand reopening, there are a number of high value industries that are eagerly awaiting permission from medical authorities to resume operations. First and foremost, there are the service industries:  Places like restaurants, bars, music venues, and sports arenas whose entire livelihood depends on whether or not people are being allowed to gather in public.  While many of these venues are now beginning to ramp up their capacity, there are issues bringing some of these workers back into the fold thanks to the enhanced unemployment benefits provided by the federal government. And then there’s the tourism industry, whose regulatory structure is far more susceptible to interference by government agencies. Now, after over a year of stagnation, it appears as though at least one facet of this wide-ranging corporate amalgam will be given a chance to sail on. Cruise lines can soon begin trial voyages in U.S. waters with volunteer passengers helping test whether the ships can sail safely during a pandemic. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention gave ship operators final technical guidelines Wednesday for the trial runs. The CDC action is a step toward resuming cruises in U.S. waters, possibly by July, for the first time since March 2020. A spokeswoman for the cruise industry’s trade group said the group was reviewing the CDC instructions. So, how will this work? Each practice cruise — they’ll run two to seven days — must have enough passengers to meet at least 10% of the ship’s capacity. Volunteers must be 18 or older and either fully vaccinated or free of medical conditions that would put them at high risk for severe COVID-19. The ship operator must tell passengers that they are simulating untested safety measures “and that sailing during a pandemic is an inherently risky activity,” the…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week