Connect with us

News

Gun-Free Zones: The Socialist’s Utopian Experiment [Opinion]

Powerful.

Published

on

The Gun-Free Zone is a microcosm of the “Socialist-Utopia,” Democrats dream of.

A recent Crime Research Prevention Center study showed, violent killers seek out Gun-Free Zones 94% of the time. So, why would Politicians refuse to re-evaluate their support of these deadly areas, even after seeing the massacres that they cause? First, we need to look at their decades-long commitment to gun-control. From the lowest ranks of the Beto O’Rourkes, all the way up to Presidents, we have seen a relentless push for gun control, regardless of the deadly effects gun-restrictions show us time and time again.

Two common elements that fuel the ignorant push for Gun-Free Zones are the perceived intellectual superiority of the Gun-Grabbers and a denial or ignorance of the American spirit. The intellectuals who continue to believe that a government-controlled Utopia can be created in America could never admit that their ideas are flawed. They truly believe that in the end they will create the government controlled Socialist-Utopia they’ve always dreamed of. Many of these people have been taught from birth that they are intellectually superior; so how could they ever admit that their ideas are dangerous and delusional, and if they did, what would that say about them?

Trending: AOC Admits It On Live TV — Impeachment Is to ‘Prevent’ Trump From Winning Re-Election (Watch)

The Anti-2nd Amendment Radicals in Congress, left-wing media and anti-gun lobbying groups like Moms Demand Action and Everytown for Gun Safety, watch people die in these deadly zones while ignoring their own culpability. They stand on graves while pushing their agenda and use the death-toll numbers to gain more support for gun-control. Their belief that they know what is best, gives them false-license to ignore reality and continue to put people in danger by making them unarmed and helpless. They have studied the strategies and tactics other Governments have used on people to enforce compliance and they believe they will be able to do the same. But they fail to see one very important element, that if not unique to America, extremely strong in the hearts of most Americans due to the nature of our founding.

take our poll - story continues below

Would election by popular vote be better than the electoral college?

  • Would election by popular vote be better than the electoral college?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The Gun-Grabbers don’t understand the strength of the American spirit because it is something that they have lost (or never had to begin with.) The passion for freedom, liberty and individualism, runs through the veins of the majority of Americans, but it is completely lost on some. Patriotism and the willingness of real Americans to fight against tyranny (again, if we must) is the biggest roadblock faced by the Socialists living among us. Our founding fathers wrote the Constitution and Bill of Rights with their own blood, but some of the people we put in charge to defend those documents, have been taught to believe they are irrelevant.

If those who support the Utopian experimental laboratories known as Gun-Free Zones, were to admit that they are a dreadful failure, they would also have to admit that their idea of a government-controlled Utopian America is a fantasy. So, rather than acknowledge the blood on their hands, they push for more Gun-Free Zones and watch people get slaughtered while continuing to tell themselves that they are much smarter than everyone else.

Why do we expect people, who can’t conceptualize freedom, to defend freedom?

Dan Wos
Author – Good Gun Bad Guy
www.goodgunbadguy.net

Save conservative media!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Katie Hill Criticizes Paul Gosar For Epstein Tweets; Gosar Fires Back And Says ‘You Taught The Country What A ‘Throuple’ Was’

Published

on

Rep. Paul Gosar, Arizona, struck back at his former colleague Katie Hill after she ripped him for tweeting about the “suicide” of Jeffrey Epstein, a current hot topic and popular meme circulating around the Internet. Gosar’s burn was aimed at Hill’s recent controversy involving lewd photographs of her with a staffer who she had an inappropriate relationship with, noting that she taught the country what a “throuple” was. Here’s more from Fox News: Hill reprehended Gosar over a series of tweets that spelled out “Epstein didn’t kill himself,” a line that has been appearing in memes and on social media. Hill blasted him for “tweeting out real conspiracy theories.” “No[,] like this actually happened. Real members of Congress tweeting out real conspiracy theories. In an acrostic no less,” Hill tweeted. Gosar fired back, “You’re surprised by me? You single-handedly taught an entire country a new word. #throuple,” Gosar reacted. “And wth is up with that tattoo? Relax.” “Throuple,” which is a term to describe a three-person relationship, was the arrangement Hill reportedly had with her estranged husband and a female campaign staffer. Hill accused her estranged husband of leaking the nude photos as “revenge porn” amid their messy divorce. Hill’s attorneys also vehemently denied allegations made in a DailyMail story that one of the nude photos shows a “Nazi-era Iron Cross” tattoo. Gosar got a whole lot of attention on his Twitter account Wednesday after he let loose with a series of tweets he made in connection with the ongoing testimony of U.S. diplomat Bill Taylor and State Department official George Kent as the first witnesses in the impeachment hearings against President Trump. The first letter of each of the tweets spells out “Epstein didn’t kill himself.” Rather clever, wouldn’t you agree?

Continue Reading

News

First Day Of Public Impeachment Hearings Turns Up The Pressure On Moderate Democrats

Published

on

Much attention is now being cast toward moderate Democrats in the House, especially in swing districts, with the first day of public hearings in the impeachment inquiry into President Trump now under wraps. The day finished up without any major revelations coming to light, highlighting the weakness of the Democrats’ key witnesses in the case against the president. Many of these witnesses are relying on second-hand information, having not interacted even once with the president. Here’s more from Fox News: At one point in Wednesday’s hearing, Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill., even appeared to embrace hearsay testimony, claiming that “hearsay can be much better evidence than direct” and that “countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created, needed exceptions to hearsay.” It was unclear which of those limited exceptions would apply to Wednesday’s testimony — and whether Quigley’s argument would persuade critical swing-vote Democrats. The House is now comprised of 431 members, meaning Democrats need 217 yeas to impeach Trump. There are currently 233 Democrats, so Democrats can only lose 16 of their own and still impeach the president. 31 House Democrats represent more moderate districts that Trump carried in 2016. Freshman Rep. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich. — who flipped a GOP district in 2018 that Trump won by 7 points in 2016 — told Fox News that she was tentatively weighing all the evidence. “My constituents expect me to make an objective decision,” Slotkin said as the hearings concluded, “not one based on an hour of testimony.” https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1194710194166497281 There’s also a report floating around that is suggesting that if House Democrats impeach the president, Senate Republicans are going to hold a lengthy trial that will “scramble” the 2020 Democratic presidential primary by making it mandatory for several of the contenders to stay put in…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend