Connect with us

News

Here Are Just Three Times MSM Looked Other Way When Dems Incited Violence Against GOP

JUST three…

John Salvatore

Published

on

It’s not exactly a secret to say the mainstream media serves as the communications wing of the Democrat Party.

At this point, that much is obvious. Well, since Barack Obama became president, really.

Dems are losing their minds right now thinking President Trump is endangering Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar’s life by tweeting a video of her 9/11 comments spliced with actual 9/11 footage.

Trending: VIDEO: Antifa Rioter Caught On Camera Hitting Cop In Back of the Head With Baseball Bat

And yet, the MSM looks the other way when Dems incite violence against conservatives and Republicans.

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Funny how that works, huh?

Allow Catholic conservative Matt Walsh to list three pertinent examples, per Daily Wire:

But if the sort of critiques now directed at Ilhan Omar can qualify as “incitement,” then Democrats are certainly guilty of inciting violence against their opponents on countless occasions. Let’s review just three recent examples:

(1) Democrats claimed that President Trump is a secret Russian agent in league with Vladimir Putin.

(2) Democrats accused Brett Kavanaugh of being a serial gang rapist.

(3) Democrats took a truly out-of-context video clip of a bunch of random high school kids from Kentucky and used it to paint them all as privileged bigots.

If this latest Ilhan Omar imbroglio “puts her life at risk,” then Democrats must answer for putting the lives of the president, a Supreme Court justice, and a schoolhouse full of teenagers at risk. By their own standard, they are all essentially terrorists. But by a more reasonable and consistent standard, they are simply guilty of constantly engaging in irresponsible, reckless, libelous, and dishonest rhetoric. The criticism of Omar is none of those things. It is just criticism, and it’s well deserved.

Back in January, President Trump was asked about Democrat Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY).

His response was perfect. He only needed two words.

WATCH:

“WHO CARES?” Classic Trump.

Ocasio-Cortez talks a big game but doesn’t know how to back it up.

For example…

GOP spokeswoman Jessica Proud: “Hypocrisy at its finest. The so-called champion of workers, when given her own responsibility, is not following the law. It’s unbelievable.

WATCH:

Ocasio-Cortez believes President Trump is a racist.

Based on what?

Ocasio-Cortez: “The president certainly didn’t invent racism, but he’s certainly given a voice to it and expanded it and created a platform for those things.”

When you look at the words that he uses, which are historic dog whistles of white supremacy. When you look at how he reacted to the Charlottesville incident, where neo-Nazis murdered a woman, versus how he manufactures crises like immigrants seeking legal refuge on our borders, it’s, it’s night and day.

Ocasio-Cortez wants to be known as a “radical.”

She made that clear in her “60 Minutes” interview.

While speaking with CNN’s Anderson Cooper, AOC called for a 70% tax on America’s highest earners.

Ocasio-Cortez’s “Green New Deal” aims to eliminate carbon emissions within 12 years. Speaking about the ambitious goal, Ocasio-Cortez says, “It’s going to require a lot of rapid change that we don’t even conceive as possible right now. What is the problem with trying to push our technological capacities to the furthest extent possible?”

AOC: “You know, you look at our tax rates back in the ’60s and when you have a progressive tax rate system, your tax rate, you know, let’s say, from zero to $75,000 may be ten percent or 15 percent, et cetera. But once you get to, like, the tippy tops, on your 10 millionth dollar, sometimes you see tax rates as high as 60 or 70 percent. That doesn’t mean all $10 million are taxed at an extremely high rate, but it means that as you climb up this ladder you should be contributing more.

WATCH:

It is going to be a long two years covering Alexandria.

She’s young. She has ideas.

Unfortunately, she’s too young to understand that her ideas are ridiculous.

Save conservative media!

News

Democrats Are Preparing Legislation To Limit SCOTUS Justice Tenure

Published

on

House Democrats are in the process of introducing a piece of legislation next week designed to limit the tenure of U.S. Supreme Court justices, desiring to get rid of lifetime appointments — which is something outlined in the Constitution — to a single term of 18 years. The bill comes hot on the heels of the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg who passed away on September 18, leaving yet another vacancy for President Trump to fill. The left is obviously terrified of having a conservative majority on the bench for decades to come so they are willing to shoot themselves in the foot and try to circumvent the Constitution, all so they can ensure things like abortion continue to be legal in this country. They have to continue their assault against the family unit because it stands in their way of having ultimate power and authority. Thus, it’s critical for them to control the courts. via Daily Wire: Reuters reported on the forthcoming bill, Thursday: The new bill, seen by Reuters, would allow every president to nominate two justices per four-year term and comes amid heightened political tensions as Republican President Donald Trump prepares to announce his third pick for the Supreme Court after the death on Sept. 18 of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, with just 40 days to go until the Nov. 3 election. According to Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna (CA), the bill — the “Supreme Court Term Limits and Regular Appointments Act” — is intended to tamp down partisanship. “It would save the country a lot of agony and help lower the temperature over fights for the court that go to the fault lines of cultural issues and is one of the primary things tearing at our social fabric,” said Khanna. The bill is due to be…

Continue Reading

News

Former Member Of Mueller Team Says Flynn Prosecution Had ‘Get Trump’ Attitude

Published

on

One thing that’s become abundantly clear over this past year is that the Deep State is not a conspiracy theory, but an actual group of individuals inside the government working to undermine President Trump and his agenda for America at every possible turn. FBI official William Barnett, who was assigned to lead the bureau’s original investigation into former national security adviser General Michael Flynn, has come out and stated that Robert Mueller’s team had a “get Trump” attitude and made it clear he had no desire to pursue the whole Russia collusion investigation because he said it was “not there” and a “dead end.” via Fox News: FBI agent William J. Barnett made the comments during an interview on Sept. 17 at the Justice Department, before Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri Jeffrey Jensen, who was tapped by Attorney General Bill Barr to review the case against Flynn. Jensen has joined U.S. Attorney John Durham’s team in his review of the origins of the Trump-Russia probe. Those comments have surfaced in new government documents. Barnett, during his interview, detailed his work at the FBI, and his assignment to the bureau’s original cases against Flynn and former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. Barnett said the Flynn investigation was assigned the code name “Crossfire Razor,” which was part of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation — the bureau’s code name for the original Trump-Russia probe. Barnett told investigators that he thought the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe was “opaque” and “with little detail concerning specific evidence of criminal events.” “Barnett thought the case theory was ‘supposition on supposition,’” the 302 stated, and added that the “predication” of the Flynn investigation was “not great,” and that it “was not clear” what the “persons opening the case wanted to ‘look for or at.’” After six…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend