Connect with us

News

Hillary Clinton Boldly Ignores Her Own Double-Standard While Defending Bill

Published

on

Hillary Clinton is a stunning woman.

She’s often praised for her courage, and she certainly is a courageous woman. She’s also utterly shameless. This is one reason she’s somehow managed to be so successful in politics despite leaving a trail of scandal and corruption in her wake.

She is willing to do whatever it takes to win, and she’s able to craft all the blatant failures of herself and her husband into some kind of self-pitying sob story of their resilience in the face of persecution.

Trending: Flashback: Omar Stunned Speechless When Confronted About Her Brother/Husband (Video)

It’s pretty extraordinary.

take our poll - story continues below

Will You Vote For Donald Trump in 2020?

  • Will You Vote For Donald Trump in 2020?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

So when it comes to the many allegations of sexual misconduct made against her husband, Bill, she has somehow managed to not even flinch as she claims to “believe all women” despite having brutally slandered the women who accused her husband.

In a recent interview with CNN, she declared that, when it comes to Trump’s infamous Access Hollywood tape vs. the various and sundry allegations made against her husband, Bill is clearly a victim because his accusers came forward as part of a “right-wing conspiracy”. Trump hasn’t been subject to this yet so clearly he’s guilty as sin.

Or something along these lines.

Conservative Tribune reports:

“There’s a very significant difference, and that is the intense, long-lasting, partisan investigation that was conducted in the ’90s,” Clinton said.

“If the Republicans, starting with President Trump on down, want a comparison, they should welcome such an investigation themselves,” she said.

She also praised her husband’s resilience.

“Bill had to be incredibly strong,” Hillary said. “First to get elected, then to get re-elected, and to survive.

“And it was not easy, by any means, obviously. But he really believes that Democrats had to be tougher and stand up to the bullying and the intimidation.”

Clinton doesn’t just play the world’s tiniest violin for herself, her husband and their collective legacy; she has a collection of microscopic Stradivariuses perfectly tuned for each possible occasion — and when it arises, she produces that precise instrument and Itzhak Perlmans that bad boy until even I almost feel sorry for her.

to her credit, [interviewer] Amanpour wasn’t bowled over by Clinton’s playing or that she glossed over why he had “to survive” an impeachment attempt and numerous accusations of sexual misconduct. That’s what prompted the question that led to Clinton saying the “intense, long-lasting, partisan investigation” against her husband that Trump apparently hasn’t endured.

Right. Trump has no idea what it’s like to be the target of a long-lasting partisan investigation.

Neither does Kavanaugh, apparently, who is likely to go down in history as a textbook example of the victim of a partisan character assassination after the attack he just endured.

Of course, that’s not the way Hillary sees it:

Clinton said her husband was “standing up to bullying and intimidation” when he fought allegations by Broaddrick, Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey. And she said this just days after she declaimed Kavanaugh “deserved laughter” for even intimating the accusations against him might have been out of vengeance.

The double-standard and shamelessness are insane. I don’t think Clinton is unaware of how preposterous this argument is. I think she’s just aware that if you dig your heels in and refuse to ever admit fault, eventually the other side will blink.

You’ve got to hand it to her. She literally never backs down.

Save conservative media!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Watchdog Group Says Trump Broke The Law By Withholding Aid From Ukraine

Published

on

The U.S. government’s congressional watchdog has determined that President Trump and his administration are guilty of breaking the law by withholding hundreds of millions of dollars of military aid from Ukraine during the summer of 2019. The Government Accountability Office published a nine-page report on Thursday that concluded the Officer of Management and Budget violated the Impoundment Control Act when it refused to release $214 million set aside as aide to Ukraine. Here’s more from The Washington Examiner: “Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law,” the independent legislative branch agency concluded. “The Office of Management and Budget withheld funds for a policy reason, which is not permitted under the Impoundment Control Act. The withholding was not a programmatic delay. Therefore, we conclude that the Office of Management and Budget violated the Impoundment Control Act.” The determination comes the same day that the impeachment trial against President Trump related to allegations of abuse of power in Ukraine is set to kick off in the Senate. “The Constitution grants the President no unilateral authority to withhold funds from obligation,” the Government Accountability Office said. “Instead, Congress has vested the President with strictly circumscribed authority to impound, or withhold, budget authority only in limited circumstances as expressly provided in the Impoundment Control Act.” How much this information will impact the impeachment trial remains to be seen, but it’s definitely not going to make matters any easier for President Trump going forward.

Continue Reading

News

Republican Senator Attacks CNN Reporter; Calls Him A ‘Liberal Hack’

Published

on

Sen. Martha McSally proved in a recent spat with a CNN reporter that she is not the kind of individual you want to mess with. McSally was asked about recent developments that have been unfolding would make her change her mind about impeaching President Trump. To say the answer was a resounding no would be an understatement. McSally ripped into the reporter calling him a “liberal hack.” Someone’s been taking lessons on counterpunching from President Trump. Check out the details from The Washington Examiner: On Wednesday night, Rudy Giuliani’s Ukrainian associate Lev Parnas claimed that “Trump knew” about all of the shady efforts taking place in Ukraine, including the alleged stalking of U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch. Parnas said, “President Trump knew exactly what was going on. He was aware of all my movements. I wouldn’t do anything without the consent of Rudy Giuliani or the president.” On Thursday morning, CNN reporter Manu Raju tried to ask the Arizona Republican about the developments and how it could change her impeachment vote. He asked, “Senator McSally, should the Senate consider new evidence as part of the impeachment trial.” She responded, “Manu, you’re a liberal hack. I’m not talking to you.” Raju followed up, “You’re not going to comment.” McSally brushed him off and echoed her earlier retort of calling him a “liberal hack.” https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1217822020848771074 McSally went on to double down on her claim about Manu being a liberal hack in a video posted to Twitter: https://twitter.com/SenMcSallyAZ/status/1217829609808547841 Well, she’s not wrong. Perhaps Manu is still in the first step of denial about the role he is playing in the modern media? Regardless, he certainly got served by McSally, extra crispy on both sides.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend