Hillary Slapped with Deadline to Answer New Email Questions
One of the lingering questions in the minds of many Americans in the fallout from the 2016 election had to do with the lack of justice being served to Hillary Clinton.
The former First Lady and Secretary of State was found to have endangered the lives of a great many Americans while working the the latter of those positions. Clinton accomplished this dastardly feat by installing an illegal and immoral private email server in her State Department office for the sole purpose of hiding sensitive information from the government servers and NSA.
This secret installation was not protected by government cyber security experts or firewalls, and evidence of possible hacking attempts have been revealed over the course of months of investigation.
Obviously, Clinton has never been charged with this crime, despite the ample evidence in the case. But that hasn’t stopped Americans from attempting to serve justice in the case. Now, after years of successfully avoiding litigation on the subject, Hillary Clinton is now under a serious deadline to comply in an investigation into the matter.
Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her controversial email system.
In 2016, Clinton was required to submit under oath written answers to Judicial Watch’s questions. Clinton objected to and refused to answer questions about the creation of her email system; her decision to use the system despite warnings from State Department cybersecurity officials; and the basis for her claim that the State Department had “90-95%” of her emails.
What exactly will the questions be about?
After a lengthy hearing yesterday Judge Sullivan ruled that Clinton must address two questions that she refused to answer under-oath.
- Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.
-
During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.
Amid these damaging orders, there are persistent rumors that Clinton may be considering a 2020 run for the presidency, despite her massive rift with the democratic party after 2016’s result.
