Connect with us

News

Hours After Tulsi Gabbard Made Plans for 2020, Past Comments Come Back to Bite Her

Even for a Democrat this is pretty OUT THERE!

John Salvatore

Published

on

Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard left her position at the Democrat National Committee in 2016 so she could back fellow Democrat Socialist Bernie Sanders.

Days ago, she announced she is going to run for president herself.

Her dreams may already be dashed.

Trending: Pro-Lifers Harassed, Kicked & Belittled By Pro-Abortion Radicals, & It’s All Caught On Tape (WATCH)

Why?

take our poll - story continues below

Have smartphones made the world better or worse?

  • Have smartphones made the world better or worse?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Tulsi isn’t that fond of gay people, apparently.

I realized Tulsi Gabbard was anti-gay, but didn’t quite realize how anti-gay she was in the 2000s. This is next level:

https://twitter.com/KFILE/status/1084104026432684032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1084104026432684032&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fuh-oh-tulsi-gabbards-2020-hopes-get-crushed-by-her-own-past-statement%2F

Reactions:

WATCH:

If as many Democrats wind up running for president in 2020 as Republicans did in 2016, it would probably be smart to hold the primetime debates with legitimate contenders and smaller debates with those not polling as well.

One would have to figure Senator Elizabeth Warren (MA) would fall into the latter category.

She’s not polling well now.

She’s not likely to poll better once bigger names enter the race, either.

During her first trip to Iowa as a probable candidate, it didn’t go so well for the woman of 1/1024th Native American heritage.

About 5 minutes into her 30-minute appearance, the lights went noticeably dark and the microphone stopped working.

WATCH:

President Trump was asked if Warren has a shot against him in a hypothetical general election.

He only needed three words.

“…ask her psychiatrist.”

WATCH:

Warren says Trump inspires “domestic right-wing terrorism.”

Yeah, for real.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) spoke at American University Washington College of Law in a speech billed as foreign policy-focused; however, it included criticism of President Donald Trump and his policies and claimed he promotes white nationalism and encourages “domestic right-wing terrorism.”

Warren: “He cozies up to white nationalists. He undermines the free press and incites violence against journalists.

The 2016 election provided a stark reminder that we must remain vigilant and fight for our democracy every single day,” Warren said. “That starts with protecting our elections and democratic processes, and making it clear that there will be severe consequences for those – foreign or domestic – who meddle, hack, or undermine them.

It means ensuring a meaningful opportunity for every American citizen to vote. And it means fighting for equal justice and protection under the law for all.

It also requires us to speak out against hateful rhetoric that fuels domestic terrorism of all kinds, whether in San Bernadino or Charleston, Orlando or Charlottesville, Fort Hood or Pittsburgh. We must speak plainly about all of these incidents.

Just like the hateful terrorism of Al Qaeda and ISIS, domestic right-wing terrorism is completely incompatible with our American values.

Let’s start with a serious problem: Around the world, democracy is under assault. Authoritarian governments are gaining power.

Right-wing demagogues are gaining strength. Movements toward openness and pluralism have stalled and begun to reverse.

Inequality is rapidly growing, transforming rule by-the-people into rule by-wealthy-elites.

As one might expect, there is not a surge in right-wing violence.

From Daily Signal:

According to The Washington Post, which relies on Global Terrorism Database data, there were zero acts of right-wing terrorism in the entire nation in 2002. Since then, we have seen a “surge,” to 36 in a nation of 325-plus million people in 2017. Among those acts, there were 11 fatalities.

In other words, fewer homicides were committed by political terrorists of any stripe in the United States in 2017 than were committed by undocumented immigrants in the state of Texas alone—which, I am assured, is an incredibly low number that shouldn’t worry us very much.

House Democrats plan to go after President Trump’s tax returns once they are in power come January.

From Fox News:

House Democrats’ first order of business in the new Congress will be targeting President Trump’s tax returns, setting the confrontational tone of the lower chamber.

The first bill, called House Resolution 1 (H.R. 1), indicates the Democrats’ inclination to resist Trump not only in House committees, where a number of investigations will be launched in January, but also by introducing legislation that directly involves the president.

Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (CA) is likely to once again become Speaker, despite copious amounts of backlash.

According to Pelosi, all Republicans are “despicable.”

WATCH:

On Christmas Day 2018, Hillary Clinton posted a photo from her days as first lady.

Why this picture?

Of all pictures, Hillary chooses this one of her in the White House? What is she trying to say?

Who could forget Hillary tripping down stairs while overseas?

WATCH:

What about her epic coughing fits out of thin air?

WATCH:

How about when Clinton needed help up the stairs at Aretha Franklin’s funeral?

WATCH:

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

New Women’s March Board Member Gets Kicked To The Curb After Two Days On The Job Over Anti-Semitic Tweets

This lady is deplorable.

Published

on

There seems to be something about the Women’s March that’s a beacon for individuals who just love to hate Jews and Israel. In fact, the group’s latest board member was only on the job two days before being booted after anti-Semitic tweets were discovered on her Twitter profile. Hmmm. Really does make you wonder. Why do these kind of people gravitate toward this group? via TheBlaze: On Monday, The Washington Post reported that inaugural co-chairs Bob Bland, Tamika Mallory and Linda Sarsour had stepped down from their positions at the organization, noting that the trio had “been dogged by accusations of anti-Semitism, infighting and financial mismanagement.” Conservative news outlets were quick to point out that many in the 17-member board replacing the former leaders were no better, and exposed an array of anti-Semitic tweets and messages expressing support for black nationalist Louis Farrakhan. One of the new board members was Zahra Billoo, the executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. The Washington Examiner reported that Billoo’s Twitter feed was “filled with anti-Zionist tweets, which the Anti-Defamation League has deemed ‘anti-Semitic.'” On Wednesday, Billoo revealed that she had been voted off the board of the Women’s March, following “an Islamophobic smear campaign.” She went on to slam the organization for letting her go, saying “it has effectively said, we will work on some women’s rights at the expense of others.” So wait a minute. Is she really going to play the victim card here? It certainly seems that’s what she’s doing. It’s kind of hard to garner any sort of sympathy for a person trying to claim they are the victim of some sort of hate and racism, when they themselves have been engaged in heinous acts of hatred themselves. Billoo wasn’t removed because she’s a Muslim. She was removed…

Continue Reading

News

New Video Shows Beto O’Rourke Moving Toward Openness Of Snatching ALL Semi-Automatic Firearms

Yeah, that’s a no from me, Beto.

Published

on

Not too long ago, failing Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke stated, in no uncertain terms, that he was all about openly confiscating citizens’ AR-15 rifles, despite the fact that owning such a weapon is protected under the Second Amendment. Because why allow a pesky little thing like constitutional rights get in the way of desperately trying to pull ahead in the political polls right? Well, a new video is out on the Internet that seems to suggest that Beto himself is open to grabbing up all semi-automatic firearms. Evan Todd, a survivor of the Columbine shooting, confronted O’Rourke in Aurora, after arriving an hour late to the event. Todd is actually a supporter of the Second Amendment, despite having been shot and wounded at the tragedy in Columbine, and wanted to know just how far O’Rourke was willing to go on gun policies. Here’s more from The Daily Wire: “I understand that you want to implement a mandatory buyback for AR-15s and AK-47s. None of my classmates were murdered with those weapons, 50% of mass murders don’t happen with those weapons.” “Don’t you think it’s time to get rid of all semi-auto firearms?” Todd asked. O’Rourke, who at one point said that if he was elected that he would be removing firearms from people’s “homes,” responded by saying that he wanted input from Todd about what types of weapons he thinks should be banned. Several minutes later, after the event ended and O’Rourke moved inside to answer questions from reporters, a reporter asked O’Rourke if he would be open to adding “additional classes” of firearms to his ban and confiscation plan. “Yeah, I want to listen to him,” O’Rourke responded. “If there’s a way to improve what we have proposed, I want to make sure that we are reflecting that.”…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend