Connect with us


How the Electoral College Works (and Why It Matters) — An Opinion Piece




The electoral college is, perhaps, one of the least understood features of our federal constitutional system of government. This becomes a hot topic each election cycle because George W. Bush won the presidency while Al Gore won the popular vote in 2000, and Donald Trump won the presidency while Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in 2016. How could this happen?

The founding fathers created numerous checks and balances in order to prevent tyranny. This is why we separate federal and state government. It is why on each level, we separate the executive from the legislative and judicial. It is why we even subdivide the legislative branch into the House of Representatives and the Senate. The system would be far more efficient if we removed these barriers and just had one streamlined organization, but the founders understood that such a system would surely lead to a dictatorship.

For the same reasons, they complicated the electoral process. We do not live in a pure democracy. We live in a democratic republic where our elected officials are our voices in the lawmaking process. The founding fathers were no friends of direct democracy. In my doctoral dissertation research, I found no positive reference to direct democracy during the constitutional convention. Zero, None. The founders felt a direct democracy was as dangerous as an aristocracy.

Trending: Bill O’Reilly Brilliantly Explains Why 2020 Election Doesn’t Make Much Sense (Video)

The situation when the country formed also played a role in shaping the electoral college. The United States is a nation of independent nations. In fact the word state in the European context actually means nation. What Americans call a state, Europeans call a province. But the meanings are different because in our system, the states created the federal government and assigned to it specific, limited powers.

take our poll - story continues below

Has There Been Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election?

  • Has There Been Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

So, when thirteen nations got together to form one united nation, they were rightly concerned about how they would elect their leader. The smaller nations (e.g., NJ and DE) were particularly concerned that their views would be ignored by larger, more populous nations (e.g., NY and VA).

The founders worked out a compromise that would ensure that the executive would have to listen to the interests of each state while still providing roughly proportional weight to the votes of the states. They created a system where each state voted for the president independently and then each state, as a state, would cast their votes for the president based on the size of their population. Technically they vote for a slate of electors who will then vote for the president on their behalf. In Article II, Section 1, we read:

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector. (US Constitution, Article II, Section 1)

Each state with the exception of two (Nebraska and Maine) cast all of its votes for one candidate rather than provide a percentage of votes to the each and this is a critical component of the system. It changes the game. Forty-eight states and the District of Columbia engage in this winner-take-all process.

Because the President has to accumulate a simple majority (270 of 538 electoral votes), it forces him to appeal more broadly to a wider section of the country. Even then, because of the concentration of the population in certain major metropolitan areas, it is theoretically possible for a president to only campaign in the eleven largest states, ignore the rest of the country, and still win the presidency.

Because the largest states are divided (e.g., CA and NY are reliably Democratic while TX and GA are reliably Republican), such a disaster has been averted. One could hardly imagine a greater recipe for strife and discord.

There are 3,141 counties in the United States. In 2016, Donald Trump won 2,626 counties and Hillary Clinton won only 487 counties because of this concentration of Democrats in major cities.

To put this in perspective, without a system such as the electoral college that requires the president to listen to the rest of the country, it is conceivable that a politician could win an election by focusing on just a few thousand square miles in a country of 3,797,000 square miles. As you can imagine, the perspectives of city dwellers in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, etc. may contrast sharply from those in the suburbs and rural America.

The election comes down to a division between a large number of safe states and a half dozen to a dozen swing states. So doesn’t that mean that the election only really matters in the swing states? Yes and No.

Neither the safe nor the swing states are static. California was reliably Republican until 1988 and now it is reliably democratic. Much of the south has flipped from reliably Democratic to reliably Republican over the last 50 years.

Swing states also change over time. Right now, Wisconsin is in play for the Republicans and Georgia is in play for the Democrats. The electoral college forces the future president to appeal to the interests of people in diverse places in order to accumulate enough electors to win the contest.

If the election is close and we have a repeat of the 2016 election, you can bet that there will be renewed calls to eliminate the electoral college. When one side complains that they lost the election even though they won the popular vote, here are key talking points:

1. Without the electoral college, minority voices would be overlooked as politicians appeal only to the largest massing of people in major cities.

2. The potential for fraud would be massive because fraud anywhere would be fraud everywhere. At least with the electoral college fraudsters have to commit fraud in the correct swing states to have an impact.

3. All candidates understand the system and they are playing to this system. If we are playing football, team with the most points wins, not the team with the most yardage.

If you understand the system, you can help others understand how it works, and how it encourages the man we elect to listen to the entire country.

Dr. Darin Gerdes is a management professor at Charleston Southern University and the host of the Leadersmith Podcast. He wrote his doctoral dissertation on The Leadership Assumptions of American Statesmen During the Constitutional Convention and Ratification Debates, 1787-1789. Follow him on Twitter @DarinGerdes

Save conservative media!


Bill O’Reilly Brilliantly Explains Why 2020 Election Doesn’t Make Much Sense (Video)

You probably won’t find a better summarization.

John Salvatore



Bill O’Reilly may not be a perfect person. But that is to be expected, considering he’s human. That being said, the man is very intelligent and well-informed (and his Killing series is just plain awesome). On Monday, Bill explained why the 2020 presidential election seems so funky to so many millions of Americans. Did you know, as O’Reilly points out, that no president in 150 years has lost a second term when they nabbed more votes than they did the first time around? Trump earned over 10 million more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016, but somehow he’s the one who can’t keep up with the trend – despite the massive rallies, both scheduled and impromptu, all over the nation?? WATCH: There was absolutely fraud during the 2020 election. There’s zero chance Joe Biden outperformed President Trump to the tune of 80 million total votes. Come on, man! The GOP needs to get to the bottom of this or risk going extinct.

Continue Reading


GOP Senator Says Biden’s Pick for OMB, Neera Tanden, Has ‘Zero Chance of Being Confirmed’

Buh bye.

John Salvatore



It is absolutely imperative that Republicans retain control of the Senate. Both upper chamber races in Georgia have the ability to make or break the country. Loeffler and Perdue must win. If they don’t, Democrats will have the House, Senate, and, possibly, the Executive Branch. If that happens, things will change fast – and not in a good way. From The Daily Wire: On Monday, former Vice President Joe Biden announced he had selected Neera Tanden, the president of The Center for American Progress and a close friend of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, as his choice to head the White House Office of Management and Budget, eliciting criticism from both sides of the political aisle. Sen. John Cornyn, (R-TX) said Tanden “stands zero chance of being confirmed.” […] Tandem has also come under fire for her handling of sexual harassment claims at the Center for American Progress. Buzzfeed News reported in 2018 that two days after they had revealed allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation at the Center for American Progress, where Tanden served as president, Tanden “met with staff to restore confidence in the organization’s ability to handle the issue and ensure that employees feel safe. But during the meeting Wednesday afternoon, Tanden named the anonymous victim at the center that story — a revelation that a CAP spokesperson said was unintentional — and what began as a tense meeting became what three staffers in the room described as a textbook example of the organization’s failures to appropriately handle sexual harassment cases.” Check out some of these tweets…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week