Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

ICYMI: Anti-Trump Fox News Host Throws Hissy Fit After Mueller Report Vindicates Trump (Watch)

For real, dude!?

John Salvatore

Published

on

Fox News host Chris Wallace isn’t exactly 100% pro-Trump.

There are times he’s in 45’s corner, and there are times he’s not. It is what it is.

At the very least, Fox News can definitively say they are “fair and balanced” in that they provide viewers with both sides of the political debate.

Trending: Popularity of Avocados Leads to Staggering Increase in Emergency Room Visits

After Special Counsel Robert Mueller handed over his Russia collusion report to Attorney General William Barr, which indicated no further indictments would be handed down, Wallace was a little perplexed.

In fact, he was a lot perplexed.

From Federalist Papers:

Federalist editor Mollie Hemingway appeared with Wallace, Juan Williams and others after the report was submitted to Attorney general Bill Barr.

Hemingway said, “The fact that there are no more indictments coming and the fact that all of the indictments we’ve seen thus far have been for process crimes are things unrelated to what we’ve been told by so many people in the media with treason, collusion to steal a 2016 election, I think it’s very significant.

Hemingway added, “But if there is nothing there, that matches what we’ve heard from the media for many years, there needs to be a reckoning, and the people who spread this theory both inside and outside the government who were not critical and did not behave appropriately, need to be held accountable.

Enter Wallace:

We don’t want to rush to judgement and I think that since this report has come out, since no one has seen it, to say that somehow this clears the president seems like the height of rushing to judgment.

People talk about the appointment of the special counsel. The fact is the reason the special counsel was appointed is because Trump fired James Comey in the middle of his investigation.

If Comey had been allowed to finish his investigation there probably wouldn’t have been an special counsel.

I’m also a little surprised at this talk about process crimes. Process crimes are not parking tickets. Process crimes are lying to federal prosecutors, they’re lying to the FBI.

WATCH:

Why would Donald Trump’s former personal attorney, Michael Cohen, seemingly come from out of nowhere to blindside the president?

Lynne Patton, who works under Ben Carson at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, knows the answer.

In short, it involved a lengthy prison sentence – but not for Cohen.

Patton wrote in a Facebook post:

What many of you may not be aware of is the fact that I can personally confirm that the ONLY reason Michael Cohen “turned on” the President of the United States is because Mueller threatened to throw his wife in jail for up to 30 years. Period. She is the co-guarantor of a $20M personal loan that Mueller discovered Michael secured back in 2015 by falsely inflating the value of his taxi medallions – effectively making her part & parcel to the federal charge of “Making False Statements to a Financial Institution,” to which Cohen ultimately plead guilty. This is also the reason why Cohen’s longtime taxi medallion partner, Evgeny “Gene” Freidman, was granted immunity.

So, Patton says Cohen flipped after his wife was threatened with three decades in the pokey.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

News

BOMBSHELL: FBI Admits Hillary’s Emails Were Found In Executive Office of Obama White House

WELL, WELL, WELL!

John Salvatore

Published

on

Bill Priestap, assistant director of the FBI Counterintelligence Division, has admitted under oath that the FBI found Hillary Clinton’s emails in the Obama White House, specifically, in the Executive Office of the president. Yup. No joke. From Judicial Watch: Judicial Watch announced today that a senior FBI official admitted, in writing and under oath, that the agency found Clinton email records in the Obama White House, specifically, the Executive Office of the President. The FBI also admitted nearly 49,000 Clinton server emails were reviewed as result of a search warrant for her material on the laptop of Anthony Weiner. […] U.S District Court Judge Royce Lamberth ordered Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers, and Clinton aides, as well as Priestap, to be deposed or answer writer questions under oath. The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.” https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1120718496034324487?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1120718496034324487&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Filovemyfreedom.org%2Fjust-in-49000-of-hillary-clintons-email-discovered-obama-in-hot-water-given-where-they-were-at%2F Where’s the MSM on this one, huh? Too preoccupied with doing everything in their power to keeping the uninformed uninformed? Sounds about right. Why would anybody ask Hillary Clinton to give advice to 2020 Democrat presidential candidates on how to defeat Donald Trump? Where’s the logic? TOO FUNNY! WATCH: WATCH: Hillary Clinton gives her advice to 2020 Democrats challenging President Trump. pic.twitter.com/RWNNn5ViCG— The Hill (@thehill) April 13, 2019 Reactions: "Everything I did….? Just do the opposite….".— MoneyandtheHammer (@MoneyandHammer) April 13, 2019 “Go to Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Michigan”She didn’t say that, so she didn’t give worthy advice. There’s no reason for candidates to listen to her.— CriticOfEverything (@CriticOfEvery1) April 13, 2019 Literally the last person on earth worth asking— KaratePlops (@suicidepets) April 13, 2019 Hillary just can’t win. If it’s not one scandal for the twice-failed presidential candidate, it’s another. If it’s not email-related, it’s Benghazi. If it’s not Whitewater, it’s praising…

Continue Reading

News

HERE WE GO: Supreme Court Signals Support For Trump’s Citizenship Census Question

This is a big one, folks!

John Salvatore

Published

on

It is looking more and more likely that the Supreme Court will allow the citizenship question to be added to the 2020 census. Democrats are likely to erupt, while conservatives will stand and clap. Here’s more information about what’s going down, from Bloomberg: Key U.S. Supreme Court justices seemed inclined to let the Trump administration add a question about citizenship to the 2020 census in a clash that will shape the allocation of congressional seats and federal dollars. In an 80-minute argument Tuesday that was both technical and combative, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh directed almost all their questions to the lawyers challenging the decision to ask about citizenship. Kavanaugh said Congress gave the Commerce secretary “huge discretion” to decide what to ask on the census. Opponents say a citizenship question could result in a census undercount in areas with large non-citizen populations that could shift congressional districts and federal funds away from those communities. Far-left Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted, “There’s no doubt that people will respond less. That’s been proven in study after study.” Stay tuned… As most conservatives are well aware, Obamacare was unconstitutional from the start considering it originated in the Senate. Now, an appeals court has ruled in the Trump administration’s favor on a major issue. What this means is the Supreme Court may wind up ruling on the Redistribution of Wealth Act’s Affordable Care Act’s legality before the 2020 presidential election. In other words, it’s kind of a big deal. https://twitter.com/CNNPolitics/status/1116474275999956992?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1116474275999956992&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fbreaking-trump-just-put-the-lawsuit-against-obamacare-on-speed%2F One woman was rumored to be in the running for the SCOTUS seat that went to Brett Kavanaugh. As it stands, President Trump has nominated two judges to the Supreme Court, both of whom made it through the entire process – Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch. Now, if Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend