Connect with us

News

ICYMI: Multiple Aides for Adam Schiff Worked With Ukraine Whistleblower (Details)

Imagine if he was Republican…

John Salvatore

Published

on

If the roles were reversed and Hillary Clinton defeated Donald Trump in 2016 and Republicans were working overtime to kick her out of office, the mainstream media would be apoplectic. At this point, even most workaday liberals have to know that Congressional Democrats are making things up out of thin air in order to try and impeach Trump.

But they don’t care. That’s the issue. The only thing Democrats care about is having complete and utter control over the Republican Party, which is filled with evil Americans who who cling to their guns and Bible.

Progressives like Adam Schiff hope that the United States crumbles. If they didn’t, they wouldn’t work so hard to try and make it a reality. Check out this scoop about the California Democrat and the Ukraine phone call whistleblower…

Trending: AOC Admits It On Live TV — Impeachment Is to ‘Prevent’ Trump From Winning Re-Election (Watch)

From Washington Examiner:

take our poll - story continues below

Would election by popular vote be better than the electoral college?

  • Would election by popular vote be better than the electoral college?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff recruited two former National Security Council aides who worked alongside the CIA whistleblower at the NSC during the Obama and Trump administrations, the Washington Examiner has learned.

Abigail Grace, who worked at the NSC until 2018, was hired in February, while Sean Misko, an NSC aide until 2017, joined Schiff’s committee staff in August, the same month the whistleblower submitted his complaint.

The whistleblower was an NSC official who worked with former Vice President Joe Biden and who has expertise in Ukraine, the Washington Examiner has reported.

Schiff appeared on ABC this past weekend with George Stephanopolous.

Schiff ranted on with his usual liberal shtick – Trump this, Trump that.

SEE IT:

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff says the Trump administration “has decided to say a blanket no, no to any kind of oversight whatsoever” and is “claiming executive privilege over things that it knows there is no basis for”

Enter Republican Senator Rand Paul (KY), who not only took down Schiff – but Barack Obama, too.

“@RepAdamSchiff is a hypocrite. He was all for @BarackObama using executive privilege and now he’s against @realDonaldTrump.” — @RandPaul.

Paul calls this absurd and this was politically motivated from the very beginning tracing back to the Clinton campaign.

Reactions:

Rand Paul says “both sides are doing it” when asked on ABC about Trump saying it would be fine for him to ask the AG to probe Biden. Paul, also asked about Trump stonewalling Congress, instead calls Schiff a “hypocrite” bc he supported Obama’s use of exec privilege

Adam Schiff said today on ABC that the House could fine Trump officials $25,000 per day if they don’t comply with subpoenas. So in addition to throwing the Attorney General in jail, Democrats are also threatening to personally bankrupt pretty much everyone in the Trump orbit

Eric Holder responded to Adam Schiff by saying, ‘Hold my fast and furious scheme’.

Save conservative media!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Katie Hill Criticizes Paul Gosar For Epstein Tweets; Gosar Fires Back And Says ‘You Taught The Country What A ‘Throuple’ Was’

Published

on

Rep. Paul Gosar, Arizona, struck back at his former colleague Katie Hill after she ripped him for tweeting about the “suicide” of Jeffrey Epstein, a current hot topic and popular meme circulating around the Internet. Gosar’s burn was aimed at Hill’s recent controversy involving lewd photographs of her with a staffer who she had an inappropriate relationship with, noting that she taught the country what a “throuple” was. Here’s more from Fox News: Hill reprehended Gosar over a series of tweets that spelled out “Epstein didn’t kill himself,” a line that has been appearing in memes and on social media. Hill blasted him for “tweeting out real conspiracy theories.” “No[,] like this actually happened. Real members of Congress tweeting out real conspiracy theories. In an acrostic no less,” Hill tweeted. Gosar fired back, “You’re surprised by me? You single-handedly taught an entire country a new word. #throuple,” Gosar reacted. “And wth is up with that tattoo? Relax.” “Throuple,” which is a term to describe a three-person relationship, was the arrangement Hill reportedly had with her estranged husband and a female campaign staffer. Hill accused her estranged husband of leaking the nude photos as “revenge porn” amid their messy divorce. Hill’s attorneys also vehemently denied allegations made in a DailyMail story that one of the nude photos shows a “Nazi-era Iron Cross” tattoo. Gosar got a whole lot of attention on his Twitter account Wednesday after he let loose with a series of tweets he made in connection with the ongoing testimony of U.S. diplomat Bill Taylor and State Department official George Kent as the first witnesses in the impeachment hearings against President Trump. The first letter of each of the tweets spells out “Epstein didn’t kill himself.” Rather clever, wouldn’t you agree?

Continue Reading

News

First Day Of Public Impeachment Hearings Turns Up The Pressure On Moderate Democrats

Published

on

Much attention is now being cast toward moderate Democrats in the House, especially in swing districts, with the first day of public hearings in the impeachment inquiry into President Trump now under wraps. The day finished up without any major revelations coming to light, highlighting the weakness of the Democrats’ key witnesses in the case against the president. Many of these witnesses are relying on second-hand information, having not interacted even once with the president. Here’s more from Fox News: At one point in Wednesday’s hearing, Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill., even appeared to embrace hearsay testimony, claiming that “hearsay can be much better evidence than direct” and that “countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created, needed exceptions to hearsay.” It was unclear which of those limited exceptions would apply to Wednesday’s testimony — and whether Quigley’s argument would persuade critical swing-vote Democrats. The House is now comprised of 431 members, meaning Democrats need 217 yeas to impeach Trump. There are currently 233 Democrats, so Democrats can only lose 16 of their own and still impeach the president. 31 House Democrats represent more moderate districts that Trump carried in 2016. Freshman Rep. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich. — who flipped a GOP district in 2018 that Trump won by 7 points in 2016 — told Fox News that she was tentatively weighing all the evidence. “My constituents expect me to make an objective decision,” Slotkin said as the hearings concluded, “not one based on an hour of testimony.” https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1194710194166497281 There’s also a report floating around that is suggesting that if House Democrats impeach the president, Senate Republicans are going to hold a lengthy trial that will “scramble” the 2020 Democratic presidential primary by making it mandatory for several of the contenders to stay put in…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend