Connect with us


James Woods Completely Obliterates Starbucks, Here’s How The Internet Responded




Earlier this week, coffee giant Starbucks shut down 8,000 stores and forced their employees to attend racial sensitivity training focused on helping baristas and managers learn all the different ways their “unconscious bias” causes microaggressions and why they need to be “color brave” not “color blind.”

While lots of folks have weighed in on this nonsense, perhaps the most brutal burn came from actor and outspoken conservative James Woods who spared no expense and lambasting the company on Twitter.

In response to its string of PR disasters, beginning with the arrest of two African-American men for loitering, Starbucks not only made sure to tell the world repeatedly about its big “unconscious bias” training session, it also announced a brand new policy: anyone is allowed to loiter in the store without purchasing anything, so long as they’re not being disruptive, or something.

Trending: IT HAPPENED: The Next James Bond Is Confirmed to Be A Black Female [Details]

On Wednesday, Woods posted an account of a Starbucks exec telling a story of what is apparently supposed to be a model response from a Starbucks employee to an unruly customer:

As is usually the case when Woods goes on a tear, others from around the web decided to join in the fun:

Boom goes the dynamite!

It’s quite obvious that at the core of Starbucks’ strategy lies the desire to appease it’s primary demographic, namely whiny left-wing hipsters who think racism is lying in wait to destroy lives under every rock and in every corner.

These are the folks who pay their bills, so of course they want to look like they are actually accomplishing something so those folks will still come in and spend major bucks on their corporate coffee.

It’s hilarious to think all these left-wingers support this company, yet ironically claim to hate major corporations.

Regardless, they’ve now done the minimum required to make folks on the left relax a little, so all is well for them.

Source: The Daily Wire


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.


Beto O’Rourke Drops Bombshell About Connection To Slavery

Where’s the liberal outrage?



In a move that should, if the left were consistent, spell the end of his political aspirations, Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke revealed that both he and his wife are descendants of slave owners. Yes, a consistent application of the beliefs of the modern-day progressive should see Beto dropping from the race and spending the rest of his life attempting to atone for the sins of his ancestors. Probably not going to actually happen though. You know, because hypocrisy or something. via The Daily Wire: The failed Texas Senate candidate, who is losing ground in the presidential race, made the revelation in a Medium post, saying that he was recently given documents that revealed his family’s past. “A paternal great-great-great grandfather of mine, Andrew Cowan Jasper, owned these two women in the 1850s,” O’Rourke wrote. “There are also records showing that a maternal great-great-great grandfather, Frederick Williams, most likely owned slaves in the 1860s (“most likely,” because we are not certain that the Frederick Williams who is my ancestor and the Frederick Williams who owned slaves are the same person, but there’s enough circumstantial data to lead me to conclude that it’s likely).” “Records also showed that Amy had an ancestor who owned slaves and another who was a member of the Confederate Army,” O’Rourke added. O’Rourke’s claim comes after the media last week tried to tie Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s opposition to reparations to the fact that his great-great-grandfathers owned slaves. When the media tried to push that narrative they were met with the fact that former President Barack Obama’s ancestors were slave owners. Sen. Kamala Harris’ ancestors also owned slaves. So where is all of the classic liberal outrage over these folks having this sort of bloodline? Surely they would have no problem striking at these kind…

Continue Reading


Trump Administration Set To Carry Out Major Crackdown On Asylum Abuse

This is going to make liberals absolutely furious.



The Trump administration has announced some major changes in the country’s current asylum policies that will inevitably lead to a sizable reduction in the number of individuals that are eligible for asylum who are trying to enter the country at the southern border. If you listen closely, you can hear the left already throwing a total fit over this, ready to compare the president to a whole plethora of deplorable fascist world leaders throughout history. via Daily Wire: “The new rule, published in the Federal Register, would require most migrants entering through America’s southern border to first seek asylum in one of the countries they traversed – whether in Mexico, in Central America, or elsewhere on their journey,” Fox News reported. In a statement, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) highlighted three limited exceptions: (1) an alien who demonstrates that he or she applied for protection from persecution or torture in at least one of the countries through which the alien transited en route to the United States, and the alien received a final judgment denying the alien protection in such country; (2) an alien who demonstrates that he or she satisfies the definition of “victim of a severe form of trafficking in persons” provided in 8 C.F.R. § 214.11; or, (3) an alien who has transited en route to the United States through only a country or countries that were not parties to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the 1967 Protocol, or the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. The statement went on to detail that a very small minority of these individuals actually receive asylum, however, a large number of requests burdens the system and undermines its humanitarian purposes. The statement also notes the large number of requests…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend