Connect with us

News

Justice Department Fighting Against Court Order To Give Mueller Grand Jury Information To Democrats

Published

on

The Department of Justice is pushing back against a federal judge who has ordered that information in the possession of the government concerning secret grand jury material from Special Counsel Robert Mueller must be given over to Democrats.

The DOJ has asked the U.S. District Court in Washington D.C. on Monday to issue a stay in handing over said materials to the Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee as part of it’s ongoing impeachment inquiry hearings, pending the DOJ’s appeal of the court decision.

Here’s more from The Washington Examiner:

Trending: Former CNN Host: If GOP Attempts ‘to Replace RBG We Burn the Entire F— Thing Down’

“Once the information is disclosed, it cannot be recalled, and the confidentiality of the grand jury information will be lost for all time,” the department argued, especially if the committee “decides to publicize the now-secret grand jury materials, which it has asserted the power to do through a simple majority vote.”

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Last Friday, U.S. District Court Chief Judge Beryl Howell ordered the DOJ to give House impeachment investigators access to the redacted portions of Mueller’s 448-page report by Wednesday.

Mueller’s report, which was released in April, concluded that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election through a series of cyberattacks and social media disinformation campaigns, but the special counsel did not establish any criminal collusion between the Kremlin and any member of the Trump campaign.

Democrats have been holding secretive meetings and hearings to gather information for the impeachment inquiry launched by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. Conservatives in Congress have been protesting against this activity, even going so far as to barge in on the meetings and demand more transparency.

Save conservative media!

News

Biden Said He Received Full Scholarship, Graduated Top of His Law School Class — He Lied

And he plagiarized, too…

John Salvatore

Published

on

As a career politician, Joe Biden knows a thing or two about lying. Even though he has been caught telling falsehoods many, many times over, the mainstream media and his supporters still decide to look the other way. For example, here’s a quote from Joe, speaking to a reporter, while running for president in 1988: “I think I probably have a much higher IQ than you do, I suspect. I went to law school on a full academic scholarship, the only one in my — in my class to have a full academic scholarship. In the first year in law school I decided didn’t want to be in law school and ended up in the bottom two-thirds of my class, and then decided I wanted to stay, went back to law school, and in fact ended up in the top half of my class. I won the international moot-court competition. I was the outstanding student in the political science department at the end of my year. I graduated with three degrees from undergraduate school and 165 credits — I only needed 123 credits. And I’d be delighted to sit down and compare my IQ to yours if you’d like Frank.” The problem is that literally nothing in that statement is true. None of it. From The Daily Wire: It turned out that Biden did not receive a full academic scholarship, but a half scholarship based on financial need. He did not end up in the top half of his class, but near the very bottom. There is no record of him winning the moot court competition. He did not receive the outstanding student award at the University of Delaware. And he graduated with only one degree. For the record, this is Biden’s third run for POTUS (1988, 2008, 2020). After…

Continue Reading

News

I Will Nominate A Woman for Supreme Court Next Week, Trump Says At North Carolina Rally

This third pick needs to be a person that will have conservatives cheering.

John Salvatore

Published

on

Donald Trump’s presidency has already been historic for a number of reasons. He will add to his legacy in the coming days, when he nominates a third person to the Supreme Court in just his first term. Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh have sided with the liberal wing of SCOTUS from time to time, so those two choices weren’t exactly home runs. Still, they definitely lean right. This third pick needs to be a person that will have conservatives cheering. LOOK: https://twitter.com/RSBNetwork/status/1307458271377227776?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1307458271377227776%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2020%2F09%2Fcrowd-begins-chanting-fill-seat-trump-rally-north-carolina-president-trump-announces-will-name-nominee-week-woman%2F WATCH: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1307486709521809419?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1307486709521809419%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Ftrump-says-scotus-pick-will-be-a-woman-here-are-12-possibilities https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1307486631373438976?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1307486631373438976%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Ftrump-says-scotus-pick-will-be-a-woman-here-are-12-possibilities From The Daily Wire: ABC News, citing “multiple sources familiar with the thinking of the president and his advisers,” reports that Judge Amy Coney Barrett, 48, of Indiana, is considered a front-runner for the vacant seat. Notably, Barrett was one of the finalists when Trump was considering a replacement for Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose seat was later filled by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. According to USA Today, Judge Barbara Lagoa, 52, a recent addition to the list of potential Supreme Court nominees, is considered a “little-known” front-runner. The news agency reports that Trump briefly mentioned her during remarks to reporters on Saturday, saying that he has “heard at length” about her, and that she is “highly respected.” Let’s hear your thoughts in the comment section…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend