Linkedin Share
Opinion

Kavanaugh & Roberts Side With Liberal Justices, & Clarence Thomas Is Pissed Off

Linkedin Share

Justice Brett Kavanaugh doesn’t want to make any waves.

On one hand it is understandable, on the other it’s kind of ridiculous.

No matter how much one tries to please the left it never works. Ever.

Chief Justice John Roberts hasn’t been a solid conservative during his time on the high court, but Clarence Thomas has.

Roberts and Kavanaugh sided with the four liberal justices over a Planned Parenthood case, while Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Samuel Alito dissented.

Trending:
Massive Migrant Caravan Marches Toward US with LGBT Flags Flying as Mexican President Snubs Biden at Summit

Thomas wasn’t happy, pointing out that his colleagues are fearful.

From Politico:

Chief Justice John Roberts and the newest justice, Brett Kavanaugh, joined the court’s four liberal jurists in turning away a pair of petitions from Kansas and Louisiana seeking the ban on abortion providers

[…]

Thomas, suggesting most of his colleagues were fearful of taking up a challenge involving Planned Parenthood, asserted the cases weren’t about abortion rights but whether individuals have a right to challenge a state’s decision to cut a particular provider from its Medicaid program.

“Some tenuous connection to a politically fraught issue does not justify abdicating our judicial duty,” Thomas wrote. “If anything, neutrally applying the law is all the more important when political issues are in the background.”

Thomas wrote: “Because of this Court’s inaction, patients in different States — even patients with the same providers — have different rights to challenge their State’s provider decisions.

Students at a Georgia college want Justice Thomas’ name removed from a building.

But there’s a problem.

Related:
Lake Lanier Trends on Twitter After 'Haunted' Spot Claims Another Victim

They have no flippin’ clue why!

WATCH:

She deserves to be…loved. She deserved to be…wanted. She deserves to be…a choice.

That’s how Planned Parenthood describes a little girl in a new ad.

The implication, of course, is that the child is “better off dead.”

WATCH:

https://twitter.com/iheartmindy/status/1061156798642630657?%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1061156798642630657&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fshameless-new-planned-parenthood-ad-is-creeping-everyone-out%2F

Pretty sick.

What does this say about stage mothers – that someone would allow their child to be involved with this?

Reactions:

https://twitter.com/theamericanturk/status/1061268722696896512

https://twitter.com/LVNNHVN/status/1061263825582743553

https://twitter.com/TheRedHand1/status/1061175506911936512

From American Thinker:

What happens if the baby is not happy, not well-fed, and not white? What happens if the baby is not pretty? The white baby may deserve to be “loved” and “wanted,” as Planned Parenthood argues, probably trying to appeal to white suburban women, but what about the kid off camera, the black baby?

A judge recently blocked the federal government from releasing PP’s bid for funding.

A federal judge is restraining the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, for now, from publicly disclosing Planned Parenthood bidding information for Title X funding, which the non-profit said could gut its competitive edge if ever seeing the light of day.

The government prohibits Title X funding being used for abortions. The Title X funding at issue in the case relates to family planning services for things like contraception, infertility services, HIV testing and pregnancy testing.

Check out this video of a man who seems to convince a woman to change her mind about getting an abortion:

Submit a Correction →



Tags:
, , , , , ,
Linkedin Share
About the Author:
John Salvatore has been a Writer and Editor of multiple political blogs since early 2015. He earned his Master’s degree in Public Administration upon completion of a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science. A diehard Los Angeles Dodgers fan, John can be reached at [email protected].




Conversation