Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

Liberal Left Jumps The Shark, Calls for LITERAL SEGREGATION on Campus

Is a rose by any other name not a rose?  Is segregation by any other name not simply segregation?

Published

on

segregation

There’s an inherent issue with the liberal idea of progressivism that needs to be made public more often, and it’s intrinsic to the ethos, impenetrable within the halls of liberalism.

The issue is very simple:  Progressivism demands that we continue to progress even after a solution, or equilibrium is reached.  The left is banking on there always being a problem with any subject you dredge up, forcing you to hear their plans for change.

So, what happens when we hit the sweet spot, and things are ostensibly right?  Well the left tends to find a way to further progress, despite having reached an appropriately Zen state of affairs.  Such is the case with diversity in America.

Trending: CONFIRMED: Reporters From Big Name Liberal Outlets Found to Have Working Ties With Antifa

Americans, and America herself, was born under the idea that everyone is equal.  It’s right there in our founding documents.  Yes, we have had some mighty missteps and outright atrocities attributed to our nation, (slavery, Japanese internment camps, and the treatment of Native Americans come to mind), but those were not acts sanctioned by the Constitution.  Not at all.  In fact, they fly directly in the face of the line “all men are created equal”.

take our poll - story continues below

Who are the happiest people?

  • Who are the happiest people?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

So when the liberal left purports that the Constitution’s language on diversity is not enough, they are bound to run themselves in circles, chasing a tail that was lopped off 240-some years ago.  Eventually, and due to the consistently turbulent nature of progressivism itself, the left will turn on themselves and start suggesting solutions that we all know are completely unfathomable.

Like bringing back segregation.

American University students and administrators are pushing for “spaces” on campus designated for “students of color,” claiming that it will promote diversity and inclusion at the university.

Students and staff at American University (AU) are calling for “the creation of more spaces for students of color,” so that minority students can have an area on campus where they can go to be separated from the rest of the campus body, in the name of “diversity and inclusion,” according to the university’s student newspaper.

AU students are criticizing the university’s Hub for Organizing Multiculturalism and Equity (HOME) for being “marketed to students of all backgrounds rather than to students of color.”

Is a rose by any other name not a rose?  Is segregation by any other name not simply segregation?

If history tells us anything, this cycle of change for the sake of change will continue until the nation turns on one another in earnest…a possibility that even the most sober journalists have been contemplating as of late.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

BOMBSHELL: Shocking New Report Shows Trump Is Making America LESS Racist (Details)

And BOOOOOOOMMM goes the dynamite!

John Salvatore

Published

on

Do you like apples? A new report shows that since President Trump has been in office, America is a less racist country than most liberals want the politically uninformed to believe. How do you like them apples? From Spectator: […] Americans, claim Hopkins and Washington, have actually become less inclined to express racist opinions since Donald Trump was elected. Anti-black prejudice, they found, declined by a statistically-insignificant degree between 2012 and 2016, when Trump was elected. But then after 2016 it took a sharp dive that was statistically significant. Moreover, contrary to their expectations, the fall was as evident among Republican voters as it was among Democrats. There was also a general fall in anti-Hispanic prejudice, too, although this was more evident among Democrat voters. It is a similar story to that in Britain, where the attempt to link Brexit with rising xenophobia has been somewhat debunked. A murder of a Polish man in the town of Harlow in August 2016 was widely attributed to Brexit – but eventually declared by police not to have been a hate crime at all. Similarly, a smashed window in a Spanish restaurant in South London on the night of the Brexit vote was initially widely reported to be an expression of euphoria on the part of xenophobes – but was later revealed to be an attempted burglary. According to freshman Democrat Rep. Rashida Tlaib, all Congressional Democrats are racist. No joke. She actually said that, revealing what conservatives have known to be true for decades. Did Tlaib mean to say it, though? IT SURE LOOKS THAT WAY. Here’s how it all started… A woman sent a tweet arguing that Democrats are not doing enough to protect embattled Dem Rep. Ilhan Omar (MN)… The attacks on @IlhanMN and subsequent lack of support from Democratic…

Continue Reading

News

BUSTED! Joe Biden Vowed to Ban Sanctuary Cities During Second Run for POTUS In 2007

Hey, Joe – DO YOU REMEMBER THIS!?

John Salvatore

Published

on

1988. 2008. And now, 2020. Former Vice President Joe Biden is attempting to become president of the United States for the third time. Back in 2007 at a New Hampshire primary debate, handsy Joe was asked about “sanctuary cities.” He said he wouldn’t allow them. Biden’s exchange with New England Cable News’s Alison King went as follows: KING: I’d like to hear from Senator Biden, would you allow these cities to ignore the federal law? [Emphasis added] BIDEN: The reason that cities ignore the federal law is the fact that there is no funding at the federal level to provide for the kind of enforcement at the federal level you need … Part of the problem is you have to have a federal government that can enforce laws. This administration’s been fundamentally derelict in not funding any of the requirements that are needed even to enforce the existing law… [Emphasis added] … KING: So Senator Biden, yes or no, would you allow those cities to ignore the federal law? [Emphasis added] BIDEN: No. [Emphasis added] With everything Joe has said over the years, how in the world is this man the Democrat frontrunner? It’s almost baffling. Almost. The former VP can’t seem to escape his gaffe-prone ways, yet continues to remain in the public eye. When it comes down to it and Joe goes head-to-head with President Trump in the 2020 general election, Biden stands an excellent chance of being a thrice failed candidate for POTUS. Check out this recently unearthed clip of Biden sounding eerily similar to Trump when it comes to Mexico – and it’s not from that long ago. LOOK: A review of rhetoric from Joe Biden’s record on immigration. It included boasting about needing a 700 mile fence to stop “tons…tons…tons” of drugs from “corrupt Mexico”…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend