Connect with us

News

Liberal Ninth Circuit Says Some Aliens Have Constitutional Right to Appeal Deportation

Here we go…

John Salvatore

Published

on

You don’t necessarily have to be American to be granted constitutional rights.

Enter the far-left Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is driving that point home…

From Daily Wire:

Trending: VIDEO: Antifa Rioter Caught On Camera Hitting Cop In Back of the Head With Baseball Bat

On Thursday, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border who fail their initial threshold of showing a “credible fear” of persecution in their home countries are entitled to a judicial appeal before they can be deported. The decision could severely undermine the Trump Administration’s efforts at securing the border and expeditiously deporting frivolous would-be aslyees in California and Arizona, which are both border states under the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit.

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

More from Law360:

The Ninth Circuit looked back at cases dating to the 1700s, determining that under review procedures set by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 2008 case known as Boumediene and by legal precedent set in several immigration cases dating back to the 1950s, Thuraissigiam should be covered by the suspension clause [of tbe U.S. Constitution] because he was arrested in the United States, according to the opinion.

The court went on to hold that a procedure that would not allow the California court to review the immigration judge’s determination in Thuraissigiam’s case would be unconstitutional, according to Thursday’s opinion.

Back in December 2018, the Ninth Circuit decided to go against President Trump.

This issue involved Trump’s ban on aliens seeking asylum.

A divided U.S. appeals court late Friday refused to immediately allow the Trump administration to enforce a ban on asylum for any immigrants who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border.

The ban is inconsistent with an existing U.S. law and an attempted end-run around Congress, a panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said in a 2-1 decision.

“Just as we may not, as we are often reminded, ‘legislate from the bench,’ neither may the Executive legislate from the Oval Office,” 9th Circuit Judge Jay Bybee, a nominee of Republican President George W. Bush, wrote for the majority.

Chief Border Patrol Agent Rodney Scott appeared on CNN.

He dropped some truth bombs about the illegal migrant caravan that is attempting to make its way into America.

For example, did the left know that grown men were pushing women and children to the front and then throwing rocks at patrol agents?

How about that the migrants tore down a section of the border wall?

“What we saw over and over yesterday is that the group, the caravan as we call them, would push women and children to the front and then begin basically rocking our agents.”

Scott added, “That is correct. 42 crossed the border and were arrested. There were numerous people that actually made it across the border. We are in the process of building a new border wall. There were sections that were dilapidated sections made out of scrap metal that the military had gave us. The group breached a section of this. The group breached a couple sections of this. They actually tore down one section. They rushed across and that’s another time that they actually started assaulting our agents.”

https://twitter.com/Anna_Giaritelli/status/1067047098321985536?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1067047098321985536&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2018%2F11%2Fborder-patrol-chief-illegal-migrants-tore-down-section-of-old-border-wall-stormed-us-border%2F

WATCH:

Watch the videos below and you’ll see riot cops using tear gas to push back against the horde of migrants attempting to scurrying into the states…

https://twitter.com/WendyFry_/status/1066789492714102790?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1066789492714102790&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fit-begins-migrants-march-on-border-riot-cops-throw-tear-gas-point-of-entry-closes-protests-on-both-sides%2F

https://twitter.com/WendyFry_/status/1066773189370552320?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1066773189370552320&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fit-begins-migrants-march-on-border-riot-cops-throw-tear-gas-point-of-entry-closes-protests-on-both-sides%2F

Save conservative media!

News

Democrats Are Preparing Legislation To Limit SCOTUS Justice Tenure

Published

on

House Democrats are in the process of introducing a piece of legislation next week designed to limit the tenure of U.S. Supreme Court justices, desiring to get rid of lifetime appointments — which is something outlined in the Constitution — to a single term of 18 years. The bill comes hot on the heels of the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg who passed away on September 18, leaving yet another vacancy for President Trump to fill. The left is obviously terrified of having a conservative majority on the bench for decades to come so they are willing to shoot themselves in the foot and try to circumvent the Constitution, all so they can ensure things like abortion continue to be legal in this country. They have to continue their assault against the family unit because it stands in their way of having ultimate power and authority. Thus, it’s critical for them to control the courts. via Daily Wire: Reuters reported on the forthcoming bill, Thursday: The new bill, seen by Reuters, would allow every president to nominate two justices per four-year term and comes amid heightened political tensions as Republican President Donald Trump prepares to announce his third pick for the Supreme Court after the death on Sept. 18 of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, with just 40 days to go until the Nov. 3 election. According to Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna (CA), the bill — the “Supreme Court Term Limits and Regular Appointments Act” — is intended to tamp down partisanship. “It would save the country a lot of agony and help lower the temperature over fights for the court that go to the fault lines of cultural issues and is one of the primary things tearing at our social fabric,” said Khanna. The bill is due to be…

Continue Reading

News

Former Member Of Mueller Team Says Flynn Prosecution Had ‘Get Trump’ Attitude

Published

on

One thing that’s become abundantly clear over this past year is that the Deep State is not a conspiracy theory, but an actual group of individuals inside the government working to undermine President Trump and his agenda for America at every possible turn. FBI official William Barnett, who was assigned to lead the bureau’s original investigation into former national security adviser General Michael Flynn, has come out and stated that Robert Mueller’s team had a “get Trump” attitude and made it clear he had no desire to pursue the whole Russia collusion investigation because he said it was “not there” and a “dead end.” via Fox News: FBI agent William J. Barnett made the comments during an interview on Sept. 17 at the Justice Department, before Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri Jeffrey Jensen, who was tapped by Attorney General Bill Barr to review the case against Flynn. Jensen has joined U.S. Attorney John Durham’s team in his review of the origins of the Trump-Russia probe. Those comments have surfaced in new government documents. Barnett, during his interview, detailed his work at the FBI, and his assignment to the bureau’s original cases against Flynn and former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. Barnett said the Flynn investigation was assigned the code name “Crossfire Razor,” which was part of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation — the bureau’s code name for the original Trump-Russia probe. Barnett told investigators that he thought the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe was “opaque” and “with little detail concerning specific evidence of criminal events.” “Barnett thought the case theory was ‘supposition on supposition,’” the 302 stated, and added that the “predication” of the Flynn investigation was “not great,” and that it “was not clear” what the “persons opening the case wanted to ‘look for or at.’” After six…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend