Recent FEC hearing were used to push for a censored internet.
Democrats have reached the point of asserting that a censored internet is necessary to preserve Democracy. One way to bring that about, while pretending to respect the First Amendment, is to set up complicated and expensive rules about how you can use the internet to publicize a message. That way, only large corporations will have the legal resources to use the internet effectively.
Dan Backer writes at The Hill, “Free speech means a free internet — even if Democrats don’t like it.”
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) recently held two days of hearings on proposed internet regulations. While the hysterical mediahas ginned up a new “red scare,” the FEC’s proposals will do nothing to stop bad actors, but will undermine our First Amendment rights to online political speech.
The FEC used the hearings, at which I testified, to consider different approaches — some more restrictive than others — to “improve” disclaimers for online political advertising. Yet FEC regulations already require political action committees (PACs) and other online spenders to use disclaimers where they can, or to click through to fully disclaimed pages if they can’t. PACs are also required to disclose all of their expenditures monthly or quarterly, and file special reports whenever spending more than modestly to support or oppose candidates.
Existing regulations are clear and comprehensive. The law isn’t the so-called problem being addressed here, though; it’s all that persnickety speech outside the political establishment.
The FEC’s Democrats, most notably Vice Chairwoman Ellen Weintraub, condemn advertising “paid for by Russia or other foreign countries,” urging Congress to “regulate political spending on the internet.” But that’s silly: The law already forbade those bad actors […].
Bad actors won’t comply with the law — because they’re bad actors. For the political elites, who can afford to hire campaign finance lawyers and well-paid vendors, the FEC’s proposals will at most be a nuisance as they continue delivering their messages online.
This is why the media loves the “Russia hacked the election” story. Hysteria over “information warfare” gives them a chance to “protect” the internet, not from Russians, but from Deplorables.
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey (Sort Of) Reassures Public There’s No Bias at Twitter
In a brilliant marriage of biased social media giants and fake news propaganda, CNN’s Brian Stelter gave a soft-hitting interview...
Important Questions No One Is Asking About Feinstein’s Chinese Spy
A Democratic Senator who has access to some of the most sensitive information in the United States ......... We are...
Family Stunned at Identity of 12-Year-Old’s Selfless Kidney Donor
This week, 12-year-old Kaden Koebcke is recovering from a kidney transplant, which his parents have said was successful. He looks forward...
WATCH: 100-Year-Old WWII Veteran Receives Incredible Birthday Card…Grab the Tissues
The day we stop honoring our veterans is the day we lose sight of the cost of liberty. And as...
The train-wreck of Omarosa is still plowing up ground with its ongoing derailment
It has taken yet another terrible turn after she was caught in a major lie that is so bad even...