Connect with us

Politics

Lindsey Graham Has Slightly Paranoid Concern About the Gift Putin Gave Trump

Published

on

Lindsey Graham is probably just looking out for the nation’s best interest.

Or maybe he’s been watching a few too many James Bond movies.

On Twitter Monday, Graham expressed concern that a symbolic gift Putin presented to Trump at their highly-anticipated Helsinki meeting be scrutinized and “never allowed in the White House.”

Trending: Letter Threatens To Burn Down Homes Of Trump Supporters In New Hampshire: ‘You Have Been Given Fair Warning’

The gift was an official soccer ball from the World Cup, which just wrapped up in Russia, who hosted this year.

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Putin joked to Trump upon presenting him with the ball that “the ball is in your court,” a relatively lighthearted gesture considering their meeting have occurred on the heels of fresh DOJ indictments of Russian nationals for alledged campaign meddling as well as Trump’s comments to NATO nations last week that they were overly reliant on Russia for energy and the US for protection from Russia.

Graham, as he often does, joined slightly hysterical Democrats who expect Trump to whine to Putin about the ongoing drama of alleged Russian campaign meddling, which is really just a very thinly veiled way of telling Trump if he doesn’t wag his finger at Putin enough, it’s practically an admission that he’s Putin’s personal puppet in the US, which is pretty absurd considering the way Trump’s attitudes towards the Kremlin during his presidency thus far.

In a series of tweets lamenting that Trump failed to”hold Putin accountable” for campaign meddling during their meetings (what was he expecting, Trump would start WW3 from the podium?), Graham dropped his security tip:

I’m pretty sure the Secret Service most likely has a protocol for such things, Lindsey, but it’s certainly worth mentioning, I suppose!

One thing can be said about Trump: right or wrong, he definitely doesn’t like to do whatever the Democrats and the mainstream media want him to do, and when it comes to diplomacy, right or wrong, he always goes against the grain.

But if his record so far is any indication, when he met with Putin, he knew what he was doing.

And clearly he wasn’t worried about bugged soccer balls…

Save conservative media!

News

Hunter Biden’s Business Partner Labels Email ‘Genuine,” Says Hunter Sought Advice From Father On Deals

Published

on

One of the individuals who is listed as a recipient of an email that was published as part of a report by the NY Post detailing some kind of business arrangement with a company from China and members of the Biden family, Tony Bobulinski, has come forward and confirmed the email is “genuine” then elaborated on the Bidens’ role in this particular deal. Included in this email message is a note saying that “Hunter has some office expectations he will elaborate.” There’s also mention of some kind of equity split with “H” getting “20” and “10 held by H for the big guy.” There are no further details explaining the meaning of these references. Here’s more from Fox News: “The reference to ‘the Big Guy’ in the much publicized May 13, 2017 email is in fact a reference to Joe Biden,” Bobulinski said in a statement to Fox News. Bobulinski said he is the CEO of Sinohawk Holdings, which he explained “was a partnership between the Chinese operating through CEFC/Chairman Ye and the Biden family.” He said he was brought on as CEO by Hunter Biden and James Gilliar, who was listed as the sender of the email. Bobulinski went on to say he does not believe Joe Biden’s past claim that he and Hunter did not discuss his son Hunter’s business, claiming that Hunter “frequently referenced asking him for his sign-off or advice on various potential deals.” “I’ve seen Vice President Biden saying he never talked to Hunter about his business. I’ve seen firsthand that that’s not true, because it wasn’t just Hunter’s business, they said they were putting the Biden family name and its legacy on the line,” Bobulinski told Fox News. “The Biden family aggressively leveraged the Biden family name to make millions of dollars from foreign…

Continue Reading

News

Senate Judiciary Committee Sets Up Final Vote For Barrett Supreme Court Nomination

Published

on

The Senate Judiciary Committee is no doubt making liberals all across the country squirm today as they’ve voted to advance the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, setting a date of October 26 for the final vote. Liberals have tried their hardest to sabotage ACB, but unfortunately for them, her moral record is impeccable, her policies perfectly aligning with the Constitution, and her intellect far above their own. Democrats did not show up for the vote to advance Barrett’s nomination, boycotting the event because they’re angry about the fact her nomination is taking place so close to the 2020 presidential election. Boo hoo. via Washington Examiner: All Republicans voted in person. Before the vote, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham of South Carolina warned that Democrats “are going to regret it” and said it would further degrade the confirmation process. This is absolutely great news for Americans. Barrett has a well established reputation for being an “originalist,” which means interpreting the Constitution in the context in which it was written, instead of claiming it to be an “evolving document,” like many leftists do, which affords them the opportunity to twist the words of founders to mean anything they want. Here’s to hoping that along with her confirmation to the bench, we get another four years of President Trump to go along with it. Imagine what we could do if we won the White House, the House, and the Senate, with ACB on the bench? Freedom and liberty for all.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week