Linkedin Share
Opinion

Mad Max Blows Gasket On MSNBC, Claims 'Trump Deserves To Be Impeached' (Video)

Linkedin Share

Maxine Waters (D-CA) has been one of President Trump’s loudest detractors from day one.

In that respect, she has a reputation to uphold.

While appearing on MSNBC, Waters went off on Trump for his comments about what would happen if he was impeached.

WATCH:

Trending:
Massive Migrant Caravan Marches Toward US with LGBT Flags Flying as Mexican President Snubs Biden at Summit

Here’s to what Maxine was referring, per The Hill:

President Trump said during an interview with Reuters on Tuesday that he’s not concerned about being impeached, adding he thinks “the people would revolt if that happened.”

It’s hard to impeach somebody who hasn’t done anything wrong and who’s created the greatest economy in the history of our country.

I’m not concerned, no. I think that the people would revolt if that happened.

Trump for the win?

Easily.

Why people keep talking impeachment is kind of silly, considering it requires a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate and Republicans hold the upper chamber.

Trump was thinking about the idea of a Trump Tower in Russia in 2015, 2016-ish.

Naturally, some paired this deal (that was never made) to Trump working with the Russians to defeat Hillary Clinton.

Related:
Lake Lanier Trends on Twitter After 'Haunted' Spot Claims Another Victim

Conservative rock star Mark Levin, lawyer and radio host, explains the legal consequences President Trump could be facing.

Hint: sorry liberals.

Listen:

https://soundcloud.com/conservativereview/levin-shouldnt-we-be-cheering-that-the-president-is-guilty-of-nothing

People keep saying, ‘What are the legal implications for Trump?’ There are none. Zero. There’s no legal implication; there’s no legal jeopardy, period. Moreover, in all this so-called reporting and analysis by these phony experts, where did President Trump collude, coordinate, or conspire with the Russians during the election, to fix the result of the election? Where is this evidence? And since there’s not a scintilla of evidence, this should underscore the point that this entire investigation is bogus.

Shouldn’t [the media] be cheering over the fact that so far, all the leaks show that Trump did nothing? Shouldn’t they be celebrating that, that in our republic, the president that we chose is guilty of nothing? That he didn’t collaborate, he didn’t coordinate, he didn’t conspire with the Russians? But they’re not. They keep bringing in these phony experts, who are utterly predictable. ‘You know, uh, if I were Don Jr., I’d be worried about now’ — the country should be worried about now, about what’s taking place. The country should be worried.”

[…]

How many more damn times do I have to explain that it is the position of the United States Department of Justice that you cannot indict a sitting president? He’s not in any kind of legal jeopardy.

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, whom President Trump refers to as “Pocahontas,” will probably run for president in 2020.

Until she makes it official, she has to do everything possible to remain in the public eye.

This time, though, Warren may have gone too far.

She says Trump inspires “domestic right-wing terrorism.”

Yeah, for real.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) spoke at American University Washington College of Law in a speech billed as foreign policy-focused; however, it included criticism of President Donald Trump and his policies and claimed he promotes white nationalism and encourages “domestic right-wing terrorism.”

Warren: “He cozies up to white nationalists. He undermines the free press and incites violence against journalists.

The 2016 election provided a stark reminder that we must remain vigilant and fight for our democracy every single day,” Warren said. “That starts with protecting our elections and democratic processes, and making it clear that there will be severe consequences for those – foreign or domestic – who meddle, hack, or undermine them.

It means ensuring a meaningful opportunity for every American citizen to vote. And it means fighting for equal justice and protection under the law for all.

It also requires us to speak out against hateful rhetoric that fuels domestic terrorism of all kinds, whether in San Bernadino or Charleston, Orlando or Charlottesville, Fort Hood or Pittsburgh. We must speak plainly about all of these incidents.

Just like the hateful terrorism of Al Qaeda and ISIS, domestic right-wing terrorism is completely incompatible with our American values.

Let’s start with a serious problem: Around the world, democracy is under assault. Authoritarian governments are gaining power.

Right-wing demagogues are gaining strength. Movements toward openness and pluralism have stalled and begun to reverse.

Inequality is rapidly growing, transforming rule by-the-people into rule by-wealthy-elites.

As one might expect, there is not a surge in right-wing violence.

From Daily Signal:

According to The Washington Post, which relies on Global Terrorism Database data, there were zero acts of right-wing terrorism in the entire nation in 2002. Since then, we have seen a “surge,” to 36 in a nation of 325-plus million people in 2017. Among those acts, there were 11 fatalities.

In other words, fewer homicides were committed by political terrorists of any stripe in the United States in 2017 than were committed by undocumented immigrants in the state of Texas alone—which, I am assured, is an incredibly low number that shouldn’t worry us very much.

House Democrats plan to go after President Trump’s tax returns once they are in power come January.

From Fox News:

House Democrats’ first order of business in the new Congress will be targeting President Trump’s tax returns, setting the confrontational tone of the lower chamber.

The first bill, called House Resolution 1 (H.R. 1), indicates the Democrats’ inclination to resist Trump not only in House committees, where a number of investigations will be launched in January, but also by introducing legislation that directly involves the president.

Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (CA) is likely to once again become Speaker, despite copious amounts of backlash.

According to Pelosi, all Republicans are “despicable.”

WATCH:

Submit a Correction →



Tags:
, , , , , ,
Linkedin Share
About the Author:
John Salvatore has been a Writer and Editor of multiple political blogs since early 2015. He earned his Master’s degree in Public Administration upon completion of a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science. A diehard Los Angeles Dodgers fan, John can be reached at [email protected]




Conversation