Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

Media Ignores Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s Total Loss of Control of the House

Pelosi is losing her grip on the democrats just as the antisemitic and socialist tendencies of the freshman democratic Congresspersons bubble to the surface.

Published

on

Nancy Pelosi

The media has proclaimed that 78-year-old Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is part of the Democrat Party’s “future.” But the media is utterly silent on the fact that she seems to have completely lost control of her own caucus as radical, left-wing new members of Congress control the narrative and agenda.

First of all, it is a bit amusing that Rolling Stone somehow decided that a woman who has been in Congress since before we had gas-powered cars is “the future” of the Democrat Party, but… well, you know.

It is also amusing that Pelosi’s actual middle name is Patricia which sounds suspiciously like Patrician.

Trending: HERE WE GO: First Republican Rep. Comes Out & Calls For Trump’s Impeachment (Details)

Anyway, what is even more amazing is that the media is letting this aged patrician off the hook despite that she has clearly completely lost control of her party. Radical, anti-semitic, and barely literate whackjobs like Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are running the House (into the ground) and Pelosi seems powerless to get control of the message.

take our poll - story continues below

Who are the happiest people?

  • Who are the happiest people?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Recently, Newt Gingrich wondered this same thing. And he should know. He was once the Speaker of the House himself.

Gingrich noted that the “old guard Democrats” are in a “very difficult position” as these loud, new members of this new Democrat/socialist/anti-Jew caucus take control.

In his March 9 op-ed, Gingrich notes, “The radical young voters that Democrats have been courting for years have finally elected like-minded radical young representatives – and Pelosi, D-Calif., and her leadership team have no control over them.”

Gingrich said that playing out on the national scene is the evidence of the huge gap between the Democrat power structure and its young, radicalized voters.

“The median year of birth for the 59 Democrats who assumed office this year is 1973. Sixteen of these members were born on or after 1980,” Gingrich calculated. “The average age of Democratic leaders is 71,” he added.

“To the new Democrats, the leaders are like the grandparents. And I don’t mean this in a positive way that could foster an opportunity for maternal or paternal mentorships,” Gingrich said pointedly.

Gingrich went on to say that the new radical Democrat Party is about to trounce every moderate and could send every purple district stampeding to the Republican Party.

There also doesn’t seem to be much opportunity for the moderates/old guard and the new radicals to find a meeting place.

“This is not at aberration. The new class of Democrats despise Pelosi and the grandparents. The old guard has failed to create the radically progressive, socialist America that the new guard wants,” Gingrich noted.

Gingrich points out that Pelosi is like a cork on the ocean, buffeted by every news headline and responding in crisis fashion. Instead of setting an agenda for the party and carrying it out she is running around everyday putting out fires and desperately trying to look like she is in charge.

But, she isn’t.

Gingrich concludes:

These divides in the Democratic Party are only going to become more pronounced as Pelosi’s grip slips further. The new Democrats’ private party will become increasingly raucous until it has lost all touch with normal Americans.

Moderate Democrats will have to continue answering for their colleague’s radicalism. Pelosi and the grandparents will not be invited along, but they will still be left cleaning up the mess.

Gingrich should know, after all.

But have you noticed that the media is playing cover for Pelosi? As far as the media is concerned, everything is still coming up Nancy!

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Politics

Beto Turns Conspiracy Theorist When Asked About Validity of 2016 Election

Get out your tinfoil hats!

Published

on

conspiracy tinfoil

When you look around the internet today, there is one group of online rabble rousers who are being stamped out at an alarming rate:  Conspiracy theorists. While many of these self-proclaimed “researchers” and “journalists” are truly incorrigible, (such as nutcase Alex Jones), the underlying fact remains that taking away their right to speak their minds in the internet’s public square is wholly un-American. Remember always:  Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and forcing these dangerous ideas back underground is a surefire way to be blindsided by them when they rise again in a new, never-before-seen form. The evils of censorship aside, there is another alarming trend within this trend, however.  It seems as though only certain conspiracy theories are now considered taboo…namely those emanating from the right side of the aisle. For instance, when Beto O’Rourke tells an audience that he’s not sure how legitimate the 2016 election was, that’s just fine. While appearing on MSNBC’s AM Joy, O’Rourke dropped a bombshell opinion of his. After referencing the Russian breach of the voting systems in two counties in Florida, host Joy Reid asked, “Do you have confidence that the 2016 election was not impacted in terms of, not just the use of propaganda on American voters, but literally that the electoral systems weren’t breached and that Donald Trump was elected fairly?” O’Rourke answered, “I don’t have complete confidence. In part because of what you just shared about Florida, in part because we know from other secretaries of state in other states in the union that their systems were breached. We don’t know if vote tallies were changed, but that alone should be cause for concern.” Of course, several lengthy and in-depth investigations into this very possibility have been conducted, including the 22-month long, $30 million probe helmed by Robert Mueller. None of these…

Continue Reading

News

TOLERANT LEFT: Author Asks if Saudi Arabia Could Give Trump the Khashoggi Treatment

More violent dog whistles from the radical left are emerging as Washington’s dysfunction approaches critical mass.

Published

on

Fran Lebowitz

For as tolerant as the liberal left claims to be, they sure do want a lot of harm to come to the President and the republican party. This “resistance” attitude is something straight out of Hollywood, which makes sense since much of this violent and anti-American rhetoric is being spurned on by wealthy celebrities who have not a care in the world. Just two weeks after Kathy Griffin posted an incredibly gory image of herself having figuratively beheaded a facsimile of the President, a former Bernie Sanders campaign staffer attempted to assassinate the entire GOP charity baseball team. We must always remember that there are consequences for these sorts of political outbursts, particularly at a time in which our nation is so divided. So why on earth would author Fran Lebowtiz suggest that the President be killed on a public forum such as HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher? Lebowtiz began her rant by saying that “impeachment would be just the beginning of what [President Trump] deserves”. She added, “Whenever I think about this and what he really deserves, I think, we should turn him over to the Saudis, his buddies. The same Saudis who got rid of that reporter. Maybe they could do the same for him.” It took until the main program had ended for Lebowitz to backtrack, likely fearing an ugly visit from the Secret Service. Later, during the “Overtime” segment, Lebowitz said, “I didn’t realize that I said it. … I regret saying it.” She added, “I did not mean that, and I regret saying it. I regret that everyone misinterpreted it…they misinterpret everything. Why should they stop with me?” Sorry Fran – there’s nothing to misinterpret here. Also, as an author, the idea that Lebowitz somehow wasn’t calculating the words that she was using is absurd…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend